12-month interim results of a prospective study of patients with mild to moderate open-angle glaucoma undergoing combined viscodilation of Schlemm's canal and collector channels and 360° trabeculotomy as a standalone procedure or combined with cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To characterize clinical outcomes of combined viscodilation of Schlemm's canal and collector channels and 360° trabeculotomy as a standalone procedure or combined with cataract surgery in eyes with mild to moderate open-angle glaucoma (OAG). METHODS: In this prospective case series, the OMNI glaucoma surgical platform (Sight Sciences, Menlo Park, CA) was utilized to perform the procedure either combined with phacoemulsification or as a standalone procedure. Changes from baseline in intraocular pressure (IOP) and IOP-lowering medications were evaluated through the first 12 months of a planned 24-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Among 17 eyes of 15 subjects, mean IOP was reduced from 20.4 mmHg to 12.7-13.7 mmHg through 12 months of follow-up (p < 0.001 at every time point) and mean medications reduced from 2.5 to 0.1-0.6 (p < 0.001 at every time point). IOP reductions in eyes undergoing standalone surgery were approximately 2-4 mmHg greater at each time point compared to eyes undergoing surgery combined with phacoemulsification; this may be related to a higher baseline IOP in the former eyes (22.1 vs 18.5 mmHg). Six eyes developed hyphema, of which three required washout for elevated IOP on the first postoperative day; six additional eyes had IOP elevations that resolved with medical management. CONCLUSION: Viscodilation of Schlemm's canal and collector channels paired with ab interno trabeculotomy performed with a single integrated instrument (OMNI), whether as standalone or combined with phacoemulsification, effectively lowers both IOP and the need for IOP-lowering medications through 12 months of follow-up.

Factors influencing the use of different methods of consent in a randomized acute stroke trial: The Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3).

BACKGROUND: Obtaining informed consent in people with acute stroke is complex since many, as a direct result of their stroke, lose capacity to make important decisions. Furthermore, reperfusion interventions are time dependent necessitating rapid consent. We developed four different consent approaches to facilitate recruitment of a broad range of patients in the Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3). AIMS: To describe the clinical characteristics of patients recruited by different consent methods and the association between these methods and time from stroke onset to randomization. METHODS: IST-3 was a randomized controlled trial of thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Clinicians could use one of four consent procedures: written consent, witnessed consent, assent, or a waiver of consent. We analyzed the relationship between consent procedure and baseline variables. The effect of consent procedure on delay time from onset to randomization was determined using analysis of variance to adjust for confounding effects. RESULTS: Of the 3035 patients recruited, the method of consent was known for 3034 (99.9%), and it was written in 985 subjects (32.5%), witnessed verbal consent in 280 (9.2%), assent by relative in 1727 (56.9%), and waiver of consent in 42 subjects (1.4%). Assent was required in 63.4% for those presenting 0-3 h from stroke onset (written consent in 25.3%). Patients with more severe neurological deficits (or with a non-lacunar hemispheric stroke syndrome) were less likely to give written consent. Mean delay between onset and randomization varied significantly between consent types (one-way analysis of variance: F = 15.7 on 3 df, p < 0.0001) (longest at 4.06 h for signed consent and 3.46 h for waiver of consent). CONCLUSIONS: Acute stroke trials requiring written informed consent would result in substantial selection bias. Flexible consent methods will ensure a broad range of patients are recruited, enabling trial results to be widely generalizable.Registration: This study's registered number is ISRCTN25765518.

Reasons for non-recruitment of eligible patients to a randomised controlled trial of secondary prevention after intracerebral haemorrhage: observational study.

BACKGROUND: Recruitment to randomised prevention trials is challenging, not least for intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) associated with antithrombotic drug use. We investigated reasons for not recruiting apparently eligible patients at hospital sites that keep screening logs in the ongoing REstart or STop Antithrombotics Randomised Trial (RESTART), which seeks to determine whether to start antiplatelet drugs after ICH. METHOD: By the end of May 2015, 158 participants had been recruited at 108 active sites in RESTART. The trial coordinating centre invited all sites that kept screening logs to submit screening log data, followed by one reminder. We checked the integrity of data, focused on the completeness of data about potentially eligible patients and categorised the reasons they were not randomised. RESULTS: Of 108 active sites, 39 (36%) provided usable screening log data over a median of ten (interquartile range = 5-13) months of recruitment per site. During this time, sites screened 633 potentially eligible patients and randomised 53 (8%) of them. The main reasons why 580 patients were not randomised were: 43 (7%) patients started anticoagulation, 51 (9%) patients declined, 148 (26%) patients' stroke physicians were not uncertain about using antiplatelet drugs, 162 (28%) patients were too unwell and 176 (30%) patients were not randomised due to other reasons. CONCLUSION: RESTART recruited ~8% of eligible patients. If more physicians were uncertain about the therapeutic dilemma that RESTART is addressing, RESTART could have recruited up to four times as many participants. The trial coordinating centre continues to engage with physicians about their uncertainty. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU Clinical Trials, EudraCT 2012-003190-26 . Registered on 3 July 2012.

Ischaemic stroke in a 21-year-old with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia.

A 21-year-old man presented with an acute ischaemic stroke. He had a history of epistaxis and a family history of hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia. We gave thrombolysis after some deliberation, and he made a good neurological recovery. This case highlights the link between hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia and ischaemic stroke, the potential risks of thrombolysis in such patients and the need to consider pulmonary arteriovenous malformations in patients with stroke.

Decreased consciousness: bilateral thalamic infarction and its relation to the artery of Percheron.

This case series highlights two patients seen in the same stroke centre presenting with unusual symptoms. They were later diagnosed with bilateral thalamic infarcts, probably related to an unusual anatomical variant. The difficulties in establishing the diagnoses due to their relative rarity and complexity could have impacted on patient outcomes.

Update on the third international stroke trial (IST-3) of thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke and baseline features of the 3035 patients recruited.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) is approved in Europe for use in patients with acute ischaemic stroke who meet strictly defined criteria. IST-3 sought to improve the external validity and precision of the estimates of the overall treatment effects (efficacy and safety) of rtPA in acute ischaemic stroke, and to determine whether a wider range of patients might benefit. DESIGN: International, multi-centre, prospective, randomized, open, blinded endpoint (PROBE) trial of intravenous rtPA in acute ischaemic stroke. Suitable patients had to be assessed and able to start treatment within 6 hours of developing symptoms, and brain imaging must have excluded intracranial haemorrhage and stroke mimics. RESULTS: The initial pilot phase was double blind and then, on 01/08/2003, changed to an open design. Recruitment began on 05/05/2000 and closed on 31/07/2011, by which time 3035 patients had been included, only 61 (2%) of whom met the criteria for the 2003 European approval for thrombolysis. 1617 patients were aged over 80 years at trial entry. The analysis plan will be finalised, without reference to the unblinded data, and published before the trial data are unblinded in early 2012. The main trial results will be presented at the European Stroke Conference in Lisbon in May 2012 with the aim to publish simultaneously in a peer-reviewed journal. The trial result will be presented in the context of an updated Cochrane systematic review. We also intend to include the trial data in an individual patient data meta-analysis of all the relevant randomised trials. CONCLUSION: The data from the trial will: improve the external validity and precision of the estimates of the overall treatment effects (efficacy and safety) of iv rtPA in acute ischaemic stroke; provide: new evidence on the balance of risk and benefit of intravenous rtPA among types of patients who do not clearly meet the terms of the current EU approval; and, provide the first large-scale randomised evidence on effects in patients over 80, an age group which had largely been excluded from previous acute stroke trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN25765518.

Comparison of 10 different magnetic resonance perfusion imaging processing methods in acute ischemic stroke: effect on lesion size, proportion of patients with diffusion/perfusion mismatch, clinical scores, and radiologic outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Several methods are available to assess the magnetic resonance perfusion lesion in acute ischemic stroke. We tested 10 of these to compare perfusion lesion sizes and to assess the relation to clinical scores and final infarct extent. METHODS: We recruited patients with acute ischemic stroke, performed diffusion- and perfusion-weighted imaging, and recorded stroke severity at baseline, final infarct size on T2-weighted imaging at >or=1 month, and Rankin Scale score at 3 months. We calculated 10 perfusion parameters (6 of mean transit time, MTT; 3 of cerebral blood flow; 1 of cerebral blood volume; 7 relative and 3 quantitative), measured the perfusion-weighted imaging lesion and diffusion/perfusion mismatch volumes, and compared each with clinical and radiologic outcomes. RESULTS: Among 32 patients, the median perfusion lesion volume varied from 0 to 14,882 voxels (P<0.0001); the proportion of patients with mismatch varied from 9% to 72% (P<0.05), depending on the perfusion parameter. Five measures of relative MTT were associated with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score; 1 (arrival time fitted) was also associated with clinical outcome. Final infarct size was most strongly associated with MTT measures, including arrival time fitted. There was no advantage of quantitative perfusion measures and no relation between mismatch presence/absence and infarct expansion with any of the 10 perfusion measures. CONCLUSIONS: Perfusion lesion size differs markedly depending on the parameter calculated. Relative perfusion parameters performed as well as quantitative ones. Some parameters (mainly representing MTT measures) were correlated with clinical scores; others were correlated with final infarct size; and arrival time fitted was correlated with both. These findings should be validated in other datasets. A consensus is required on which perfusion measurement and processing methods should be used.

Impact of stroke syndrome and stroke severity on the process of consent in the Third International Stroke Trial.

BACKGROUND: Obtaining informed consent for a patient's participation in a randomized trial of treatment for use in a medical emergency may be achieved in a variety of ways. We sought to assess the process of consent and to evaluate the influence of the patient's neurological deficit on the method used to obtain consent in the first 300 patients recruited into the Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3). METHODS: IST-3 is the first large-scale randomized controlled trial of intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke. The clinician could use one of four procedures to recruit the patient: written consent, witnessed consent, assent, or a waiver of consent. The patient's neurological deficits were recorded at baseline. We analysed the relationship between the neurological deficits at baseline and the consent procedure. RESULTS: The method of consent used was written consent in 71 subjects (24%), witnessed verbal consent in 30 subjects (10%), assent by a relative in 197 subjects (66%), and waiver of consent in 2 subjects (1%). Patients with severe neurological deficits (as measured either by their stroke syndrome or their lower predicted probability of being alive and independent at 6 months) were more likely to be recruited by assent. Patients able to give written consent had less severe strokes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with non-lacunar hemispheric stroke syndromes or with a more severe neurological deficit were less likely to give written consent. Excluding such patients from acute stroke treatment trials would eliminate many otherwise eligible subjects, who have a poor predicted outcome without treatment and yet might benefit from acute treatments such as thrombolysis. Flexible consent procedures developed for IST-3 have made it feasible to recruit the target population.