RESUMO
The most common soilborne diseases affecting the strawberry industry in California include Verticillium wilt due to Verticillium dahliae, charcoal root rot due to Macrophomina phaseolina, and Fusarium wilt due to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fragariae. Detection of these pathogens in soil is an important facet of disease management and fumigation recommendations. Whereas the soil populations of both M. phaseolina and V. dahliae can be readily quantified with quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays using DNA extractions with 500 mg of soil, the single-cell nature of the F. oxysporum chlamydospore does not provide enough pathogen DNA from 500-mg extractions to be reliably quantified. Here, we describe an improved DNA extraction protocol from 10 to 15 g of soil that allows for the quantification of F. oxysporum f. sp. fragariae populations below 10 CFU/g. The relationship between results from the TaqMan qPCR assay and pathogen population density in soil was determined by using this extraction method in pathogen-free soils artificially infested with a hygromycin-resistant strain of F. oxysporum f. sp. fragariae to facilitate accurate colony counts when plated on a selective medium. Although the protocol was developed for F. oxysporum f. sp. fragariae, it is applicable for detection and quantification of other soilborne pathogens.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Detailed descriptions of the early development of parasitic nematodes are seldom available. The embryonic development of the plant-parasitic nematode Meloidogyne incognita was studied, focusing on the early events. RESULTS: A fixed pattern of repeated cell cleavages was observed, resulting in the appearance of the six founder cells 3 days after the first cell division. Gastrulation, characterized by the translocation of cells from the ventral side to the center of the embryo, was seen 1 day later. Approximately 10 days after the first cell division a rapidly elongating two-fold stage was reached. The fully developed second stage juvenile hatched approximately 21 days after the first cell division. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to the development of the free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, the development of M. incognita occurs approximately 35 times more slowly. Furthermore, M. incognita differs from C. elegans in the order of cell divisions, and the early cleavage patterns of the germ line cells. However, cytoplasmic ruffling and nuclear migration prior to the first cell division as well as the localization of microtubules are similar between C. elegans and M. incognita.
