Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Appl Physiol ; 123(1): 65-79, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36169737

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Foot sole cooling increases vestibular-evoked balance responses, but less is known about foot dorsum temperature alterations. The purpose was to determine whether decreasing cutaneous receptor sensitivity via foot dorsum cooling modulates the vestibular control of balance. METHODS: Eighteen participants (9 males; 9 females) stood quietly on a force plate with feet together, eyes closed, and head rotated leftward during 4, 90-s trials (2 control; 2 cooled) of continuous electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS). Icepacks placed on the dorsum of both feet for 15 min induced cooling and remained throughout the EVS trials. Monofilament testing was performed at multiple locations before and after cooling to determine tactile detection thresholds. T-type thermocouples monitored skin temperature over the tibialis anterior, soleus, foot dorsum and arch of the right leg. Vestibular-evoked balance responses were characterized using time (cumulant density) and frequency (coherence and gain) domain analyses to determine the relationship between the EVS input and motor output (anteroposterior force-AP force; right medial gastrocnemius electromyography-MG EMG). RESULTS: Skin temperature of the foot dorsum and arch decreased ~ 70 and 15%, respectively during cooling (p < 0.05), but was unaltered at other locations (p ≥ 0.10). Detection thresholds for the foot dorsum increased following cooling (p < 0.05). Surprisingly, cooling reduced EVS-AP force and EVS-MG EMG coherence and gain at multiple frequencies, and peak-to-peak amplitude compared to control (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that vestibular-driven balance responses are reduced following foot dorsum cooling, likely owing to alterations in cutaneous mechanoreceptor sensitivity and subsequent alterations in the transformation of vestibular cues for balance control.


Assuntos
Músculo Esquelético , Equilíbrio Postural , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Equilíbrio Postural/fisiologia , Músculo Esquelético/fisiologia , Eletromiografia , Pé/fisiologia , Extremidade Inferior
2.
Eur J Sport Sci ; 23(9): 1922-1931, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35989687

RESUMO

Sleep deprivation (SD) is prevalent and impairs motor function; however, little is known about its effect on perceived and performance fatigability, especially in females. To examine the effects of 24 h of SD on these attributes of fatigue, nine females completed a 20-min isometric, sustained elbow flexion contraction, followed by 10 min of recovery. The superimposed twitch (SIT) elicited via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessed supraspinal drive. Biceps brachii electromyographic data indicated neural excitability in response to stimulation over the motor cortex (motor evoked potential; MEP), corticospinal tract (cervicomedullary motor evoked potential; CMEP), and brachial plexus (maximal M-wave; Mmax). MEPs and CMEPs were recorded during a TMS-induced silent period. At baseline, ratings of perceived effort (RPE; 2.9 vs. 1.6) and fatigue (RPF; 6.9 vs. 2.9), were higher for SD than control. Across the 20-min contraction, RPE increased from 2.2 to 7.6, SIT and MEP/CMEP increased by 284 and 474%, respectively, whereas maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVC) torque and CMEP/Mmax decreased by 26 and 57%, respectively. No differences were found across conditions for MVC, SIT, Mmax, CMEP/Mmax, or MEP/CMEP prior to, during, and after the fatiguing task. During recovery, RPE (4.9 vs. 3.4), RPF (7.6 vs. 2.8), and perception of task difficulty (5.5 vs. 4.5) were greater for SD than control. Acute SD does not appear to alter performance fatigability development and subsequent recovery; however, it increases perceptions of fatigue, effort, and task difficulty. Thus, the disconnect between perceived and actual neuromuscular capacity following a sustained, submaximal isometric task is exacerbated by SD.HighlightsSleep deprivation did not alter supraspinal drive or neural excitability during and after a 20-min submaximal elbow flexion contractionSleep deprivation increased perceived fatigue and perception of task difficultyThe disconnect between perceived and performance fatigability is exacerbated in a sleep-deprived state.


Assuntos
Músculo Esquelético , Privação do Sono , Humanos , Feminino , Eletromiografia , Estimulação Elétrica , Músculo Esquelético/fisiologia , Cotovelo/fisiologia , Contração Isométrica/fisiologia , Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana , Fadiga Muscular/fisiologia , Contração Muscular/fisiologia
3.
Behav Brain Res ; 426: 113845, 2022 05 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35304184

RESUMO

Sleep deprivation is commonplace and impairs memory, inhibition, cognitive flexibility and attention. However, little is known about the neurophysiological impact of sleep deprivation in the context of go/no-go (GNG) task performance and emotion processing. To address this knowledge gap, 12 females performed two computerized GNG tasks (shapes; emotional facial expressions) and an object hit and avoid (OHA) task after a night of typical sleep and 24 h without sleep. Electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings were taken during a 3-minute eyes-open resting period as well as during GNG task performance. Resting EEG power in the theta band was 33% higher for the sleep-deprived than control condition (p < 0.05), whereas alpha activity was unchanged. When sleep deprived, participants had ~6% slower response times (go trials) and made ~7% more total errors during GNG tasks (p < 0.05). Reaction time and overall accuracy were ~25% and ~9% worse for the emotional compared to shape GNG task (p < 0.05), respectively, which suggests interference of emotion processing on task performance. Smaller differences in amplitude between go and no-go trials for the N2 and both the N2 and P3 event-related potential components were found during sleep deprivation for the emotional and shape GNG tasks, respectively (p < 0.05). No changes to the N170 component were found. Lastly, participants hit more distractors during the OHA task when sleep deprived (p < 0.05). Altogether, these results indicate sleep deprivation slows neural processing and impairs inhibitory task performance, possibly due to a more bottom-up, stimulus-driven approach to inhibiting motor responses.


Assuntos
Emoções , Privação do Sono , Eletroencefalografia/métodos , Emoções/fisiologia , Potenciais Evocados/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Inibição Psicológica , Tempo de Reação/fisiologia , Privação do Sono/psicologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...