Preoperative Hindfoot Alignment and Outcomes After High Tibial Osteotomy for Varus Knee Osteoarthritis: We Walk on Our Heel, Not Our Ankle.

UPDATE: This article was updated on May 15, 2024 because of previous errors, which were discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. On page 898, in the section entitled "Materials and Methods," the sentence that had read "The WBL ratio of the knee joint was defined as the point where the GA or MA passed through the width of the tibia and intersected a line from the center of the femoral head to the center of the calcaneus (for the GA) or talus (for the MA), with the medial edge defined as 0% and the lateral edge as 100%." now reads "The WBL ratio of the knee joint was defined as the point where the GA or MA passed through the width of the tibia and intersected a line from the center of the femoral head to the lowest point of the calcaneus (for the GA) or the center of the talus (for the MA), with the medial edge defined as 0% and the lateral edge as 100%." Likewise, in the legend for Figure 3 on page 899, the sentence that had read "Depiction of the ground mechanical axis (GA), defined as the line (represented by the solid red line) from the center of the femoral head to the ground reaction point at the center of the calcaneus, passing lateral to the traditional mechanical axis (MA; represented by the dashed red line)." now reads "Depiction of the ground mechanical axis (GA), defined as the line (represented by the solid red line) from the center of the femoral head to the ground reaction point at the lowest point of the calcaneus, passing lateral to the traditional mechanical axis (MA; represented by the dashed red line)." Finally, on page 903, "HKA" was changed to "HKA angle" in Table III. BACKGROUND: The hip-to-calcaneus axis, previously known as the ground mechanical axis (GA), ideally passes through the center of the knee joint in the native knee. The aim of this study was to elucidate, with use of hip-to-calcaneus radiographs, changes in knee and hindfoot alignment and changes in outcomes following high tibial osteotomy (HTO). METHODS: We reviewed the records for 128 patients who underwent HTO between 2018 and 2020. Patients were stratified into 2 groups, a hindfoot valgus group (n = 94) and a hindfoot varus group (n = 34), on the basis of their preoperative hindfoot alignment. The hindfoot alignment was evaluated with use of the hindfoot alignment angle (HAA). To evaluate lower-limb alignment, full-length standing posteroanterior hip-to-calcaneus radiographs were utilized to measure 4 radiographic parameters preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively: the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, hip-knee-calcaneus (HKC) angle, and the weight-bearing line (WBL) ratios of the mechanical axis (MA) and GA. RESULTS: The mean HAA improved significantly from 5.1° valgus preoperatively to 1.9° valgus postoperatively in the hindfoot valgus group (p < 0.001). In contrast, in the hindfoot varus group, the HAA showed no meaningful improvement in the coronal alignment of the hindfoot following HTO (p = 0.236). The postoperative mean HKC angle in the hindfoot varus group was 2° more varus than that in the hindfoot valgus group (1.0° versus 3.0°; p = 0.001), and the GA in the hindfoot varus group passed across the knee 8.0% more medially than that in the hindfoot valgus group (55% versus 63% from the most medial to the most lateral part of the tibial plateau). The hindfoot varus group had worse postoperative clinical outcomes than the hindfoot valgus group in terms of the mean Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for pain and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score. CONCLUSIONS: Although our findings did not provide sufficient evidence to establish clinically relevant differences between the groups, they indicated that the group with a preoperative fixed hindfoot varus deformity had a higher rate of undercorrection and worse clinical outcomes, especially pain, following HTO. Therefore, modification of the procedure to shift the GA more laterally may be required for these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Allogenic umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stromal cell implantation was superior to bone marrow aspirate concentrate augmentation for cartilage regeneration despite similar clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare clinical and second-look arthroscopic outcomes between bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) augmentation and human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stromal cell (hUCB-MSC) implantation in high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis and identify the relationship between articular cartilage regeneration and HTO outcomes. METHODS: A total of 176 patients who underwent HTO combined with a BMAC or hUCB-MSC procedure for medial compartment osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3) between June 2014 and September 2018 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were reviewed. After HTO, multiple holes were drilled at cartilage defect sites of the medial femoral condyle (MFC), and then prepared BMAC or hUCB-MSCs in combination with scaffolds were implanted in the MFC lesions. After propensity score matching based on sex, age, body mass index, and lesion size, 55 patients in each of the BMAC and hUCB-MSC groups were successfully matched. Second-look arthroscopic findings were assessed according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Cartilage Repair Assessment (CRA) grading system and Koshino staging system. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Short-Form 36 (SF-36), and Tegner activity scores. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 33 months, clinical outcomes including IKDC, KOOS, SF-36, and Tegner activity scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001); however, there were no differences between the two groups. Second-look arthroscopy showed better healing of regenerated cartilage in the hUCB-MSC group (Grade I [4 cases, 9.1%]; Grade II [30 cases, 68.2%]; Grade III [11 cases, 22.7%]) than in the BMAC group (Grade I [1 case, 2.7%]; Grade II [20 cases, 54.1%]; Grade III [11 cases, 29.7%]; Grade IV [5 cases, 13.5%]) according to the ICRS CRA grading system (p = 0.040). There was no significant intergroup difference in terms of defect coverage based on the Koshino staging system (p = 0.057). Moreover, ICRS CRA grades at second-look arthroscopy were significantly correlated with clinical outcomes (r = - 0.337; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes between the two groups. Both treatments provided similar, reliable outcomes in terms of pain relief, functional scores, and quality of life at a mean follow-up of 33 months. However, hUCB-MSC implantation was more effective than BMAC augmentation for articular cartilage regeneration.

Extent of Preoperative Medial Meniscal Extrusion Influences Intermediate-Term Outcomes After Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to determine the relationship between preoperative medial meniscal extrusion, as classified according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy outcomes at intermediate-term follow-up. METHODS: We reviewed the records for 212 patients who had undergone medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy for the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis between January 2009 and September 2014, with a minimum duration of follow-up of 5 years. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of pathologic medial meniscal extrusion (>3 mm). Moreover, patients were divided into 4 groups according to MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) criteria and relative medial meniscal extrusion values. Associations between the extent of preoperative medial meniscal extrusion and clinical outcomes over a mean duration of follow-up of 8.1 years were evaluated with use of Spearman rank correlation analysis. Regression analyses were performed to determine preoperative characteristics relevant to medial meniscal extrusion. Clinical outcomes were assessed with use of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Tegner activity scale score. RESULTS: Postoperative KOOS pain scores were significantly different in the pathologic and non-pathologic medial meniscal extrusion groups (69.9 ± 18.0 versus 79.2 ± 11.4, respectively; p < 0.001). Additionally, the degree of preoperative medial meniscal extrusion based on both classification methods and the postoperative KOOS pain score were significantly correlated (r = -0.404 and -0.364; p < 0.001). Despite the inferior clinical outcomes associated with greater preoperative medial meniscal extrusion, medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy was associated with significant improvement in all outcome measures between the preoperative and latest follow-up assessments (p < 0.001). Preoperative meniscal patterns, including horizontal flap, complex, and root tears (p = 0.001), and increased Kellgren-Lawrence grade (p < 0.001) were related to the severity of medial meniscal extrusion. The survival rate was 94.8% at a mean of 8.1 years, and survival was not associated with the grade of medial meniscal extrusion as assessed with either classification scheme. CONCLUSIONS: At intermediate-term follow-up, greater preoperative medial meniscal extrusion was related to inferior postoperative clinical outcomes, specifically pain, after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Despite the inferior results associated with preoperative medial meniscal extrusion, medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy was associated with a satisfactory survival rate after a mean of 8.1 years, regardless of the extent of medial meniscal extrusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Minimum 15-year results of metasul 28-mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years of age.

BACKGROUND: Some propitious mid- and long-term studies had been reported for MoM bearings; however, most studies have addressed specific patient groups rather than younger, active patients, who probably represent the most suitable population for investigations on wear and osteolysis. The purpose of this study to evaluate the long-term results of second-generation metal-on-metal cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients aged <50 years. METHODS: From December 1997 to January 2004, primary THA using a metal-on-metal bearing cementless implant was performed in 63 patients (72 hips) aged <50 years. The mean follow-up duration was 18.6 (range, 15.9-22.1) years, and the mean age at initial operation was 39 (range, 22-49) years. Clinical results, complications, survivorship, osteolysis, and aseptic loosening were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean Harris hip score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index scores were improved from 57.8 (range, 28-69) points and 73.4 (range, 63-94) points preoperatively to 91.7 (range, 80-100) points and 25.5 points (range, 17-38) points, respectively, at the last follow-up. Osteolysis lesions were found in 12 hips (acetabulum, 6 and femur, 6). The notching occurred on the femoral stem neck occurred in 12 hips. The mean serum cobalt and chromium concentrations were 2.3 (range, 0.2-10.6) µg/L and 1.7 (range, 0.4-8.1) µg/L, respectively, at a mean follow-up of 12.7 years in 32 patients (50.1%). The Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve analysis with revision for any reason as the endpoint revealed that 93.1% survived at 18.6 years' follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Second-generation metal-on-metal cementless THA was found to produce satisfactory clinical and radiographic results with a low revision rate for osteolysis and aseptic loosening in patients aged less than 50 years.

Allogenic Human Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Are More Effective Than Bone Marrow Aspiration Concentrate for Cartilage Regeneration After High Tibial Osteotomy in Medial Unicompartmental Osteoarthritis of Knee.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of cartilage regeneration between bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) augmentation and allogeneic human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell (hUCB-MSCs) transplantation in high tibial osteotomy (HTO) with microfracture (MFX) for medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee in the young and active patient. METHODS: Between January 2015 and December 2019, the patients who underwent HTO and arthroscopy with MFX combined with BMAC or allogeneic hUCB-MSCs procedure for medial unicompartmental OA with kissing lesion, which was shown full-thickness cartilage defect (≥ International Cartilage Repair Society [ICRS] grade 3B) in medial femoral cartilage and medial tibial cartilage, were include in this study. Retrospectively we compared clinical outcomes, including Hospital for Special Surgery score, Knee Society Score (KSS) pain and function, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score between BMAC and hUCB-MSCs group at minimum of 1-year follow-up. Also, second-look arthroscopy was performed simultaneously with removal of the plate after complete bone union. Cartilage regeneration was graded by the ICRS grading system at second-look arthroscopy. Radiological measurement including hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, posterior tibial slope angle, and correction angle were assessed. RESULTS: Of 150 cases that underwent HTO with MFX combined with BMAC or allogeneic hUCB-MSCs procedure for medial unicompartmental OA, 123 cases underwent plate removal and second-look arthroscopy after a minimum of 1 year after the HTO surgery. Seventy-four cases were kissing lesion in medial femoral cartilage and medial tibial cartilage during initial HTO surgery. Finally, the BMAC group composed of 42 cases and hUCB-MSCs group composed of 32 cases were retrospectively identified in patients who had kissing lesions and second-look arthroscopies with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. At the final follow-up of mean 18.7 months (standard deviation = 4.6 months), clinical outcomes in both groups had improved. However, there were no significant differences between the IKDC, WOMAC, or KSS pain and function scores in the 2 groups (P > .05). At second-look arthroscopy, the ICRS grade was significantly better in the hUCB-MSC group than in the BMAC group in both medial femoral and medial tibial cartilage (P = .001 for both). The average ICRS grade of the BMAC group improved from 3.9 before surgery to 2.8 after surgery. The average ICRS grade of the hUBC-MSC group improved from 3.9 before surgery to 2.0 after surgery. Radiological findings comparing postoperative HKA angle, posterior tibial slope angle, and correction angle showed no significant differences between the groups (P > .05). Therefore it was found that the postoperative correction amount did not affect the postoperative cartilage regeneration results. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the hUCB-MSC procedure was more effective than the BMAC procedure for cartilage regeneration in medial unicompartmental knee OA even though the clinical outcomes improved regardless of which treatment was administered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Increased joint obliquity after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy induces pain in the lateral compartment: a comparative analysis of the minimum 4-year follow-up outcomes using propensity score matching.

PURPOSE: To analyze the effects of increased medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) on the clinical outcomes and cartilage deterioration in the lateral compartment after a mean follow-up period of 4 years following open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. METHODS: Among 376 knees treated with OWHTO for medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis with varus deformity, 36 knees with MPTA increase of > 95° and 108 knees with MPTA increase of < 95° at the final follow-up were included. The baseline prognostic factors [age, sex, preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, body mass index, and preoperative knee range of motion] were equalized between the 2 groups using PSM; consequently, 31 pairs of patients were compared. The radiographic and clinical outcomes, including lateral compartment pain, were assessed. For 18 patients in each group, second-look arthroscopy and cartilage status assessment were performed. RESULTS: The preoperative demographics were similar between the groups. At the final follow-up, the HKA angle and joint line obliquity were significantly higher in the increased MPTA group. No significant differences were observed in the clinical outcomes between the groups. On second-look arthroscopy, significant cartilage deterioration of the lateral compartment was not observed in either group. Pain in the lateral compartment was experienced significantly more frequently in the increased MPTA group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Although excessively increased MPTA after HTO had no significant effects on the clinical outcomes and cartilage deterioration in the lateral compartment at the minimum 4-year follow-up, lateral compartment pain was experienced significantly more frequently in the increased MPTA group.