RESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare objectively the rotational stability of two differently designed toric soft contact lenses over a range of natural viewing conditions using a novel infrared, video-based technique. METHODS: Two contact lenses using different methods of stabilization were assessed: Accelerated Stabilization Design (ACUVUE ADVANCE for ASTIGMATISM) and Lo-Torque Design (B&L SofLens Toric). Four tasks involving saccades were performed: settling time with free viewing, reading, visual search, and execution of large versional tasks. Lens position (degrees of rotation) was continuously recorded with a head mounted, infrared, video-based system and a digital photo slit-lamp in 20 adult subjects. All measurements were obtained from the left eye under binocular viewing conditions with contact lenses on both eyes. RESULTS: The ACUVUE lens was significantly more stable during the settling time and large saccadic versional tasks than the SofLens. For the two other tasks (reading, visual search), performance was similar. CONCLUSION: The ACUVUE design was superior in stability for two of the four conditions tested. This resulted in a more stable lens immediately after insertion as well as during some visual tasks involving either naturally occurring or programmed large versional eye movements. Both lens designs provided acceptable performance in terms of induced astigmatism produced by off-axis rotation.
