Impact of general practice/family medicine training on Japanese junior residents:reflective writing analysis using text mining.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported the impact of general practice/family medicine training on postgraduate training in Japan using evaluation criteria standardized nationwide. However, there is a possibility that new insights may be gained by analyzing the reflective reports written by these residents. METHODS: Junior residents who participated in one-month general practice/family medicine training at one of five medical institutions with full-time family medicine specialists between 2019 and 2022 were enrolled in this study. They were assigned to submit a reflective report on their experiences and thoughts every day during the training. We analyzed these reflective writings using text mining and created a co-occurrence network map to see the relationship between the most frequently used words. RESULTS: Ninety junior residents participated in the study. The words that appeared most frequently in the sentences referring to clinical ability included "symptoms," "medical examination," "consultation," "treatment," and "examination." The words of "family" and "(patient) oneself" showed strong association in the co-occurrence network map. CONCLUSION: It was suggested that general practice/family medicine training greatly contributes to the acquisition of clinical abilities and deepens the learning of junior residents not only about patient care but also about family-oriented care.

Fukushima study for Engaging people with type 2 Diabetes in Behaviour Associated Change (FEEDBACK): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The growing burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and the rising cost of healthcare worldwide make it imperative to identify interventions that can promote sustained self-management behaviour in T2DM populations while minimising costs for healthcare systems. The present FEEDBACK study (Fukushima study for Engaging people with type 2 Diabetes in Behaviour Associated Change) aims to evaluate the effects of a novel behaviour change intervention designed to be easily implemented and scaled across a wide range of primary care settings. METHODS: A cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a 6-month follow-up will be conducted to evaluate the effects of the FEEDBACK intervention. FEEDBACK is a personalised, multi-component intervention intended to be delivered by general practitioners during a routine diabetes consultation. It consists of five steps aimed at enhancing doctor-patient partnership to motivate self-management behaviour: (1) communication of cardiovascular risks using a 'heart age' tool, (2) goal setting, (3) action planning, (4) behavioural contracting, and (5) feedback on behaviour. We aim to recruit 264 adults with T2DM and suboptimal glycaemic control from 20 primary care practices in Japan (cluster units) that will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group. The primary outcome measure will be the change in HbA1c levels at 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcome measures include the change in cardiovascular risk score, the probability to achieve the recommended glycaemic target (HbA1c <7.0% [53mmol/mol]) at 6-month follow-up, and a range of behavioural and psychosocial variables. The planned primary analyses will be carried out at the individual level, according to the intention-to-treat principle. Between-group comparisons for the primary outcome will be analysed using mixed-effects models. This study protocol received ethical approval from the research ethics committee of Kashima Hospital, Fukushima, Japan (reference number: 2022002). DISCUSSION: This article describes the design of a cluster RCT that will evaluate the effects of FEEDBACK, a personalised, multicomponent intervention aimed at enhancing doctor-patient partnership to engage adults with T2DM more effectively in self-management behaviour. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was prospectively registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR ID UMIN000049643 assigned on 29/11/2022). On submission of this manuscript, recruitment of participants is ongoing.

Impact of general practice / family medicine training on Japanese junior residents:a descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: Despite international recognition of the impact of general practice / family medicine training on postgraduate training outcomes, there have been few reports from Japan. METHODS: Junior residents who participated in community medicine training for one month between 2019 and 2022 were enrolled in the study. The settings were five medical institutions (one hospital and four clinics) that had full-time family doctors. The junior residents were assigned to one of these institutions. The training content mainly consisted of general ambulatory care, home medical care, community-based care, and reflection. The junior residents evaluated themselves at the beginning and end of their training, and the family doctors evaluated the junior residents at the end. The evaluation items were 36 items in 10 areas, based on the objectives outlined in the Guidelines for Residency Training - 2020 Edition, and were rated on a 10-point Likert scale. In the statistical analysis, Wilcoxon signed rank test of two related groups was performed to analyze changes between pre and post self-evaluation, and the effect size r was calculated. RESULTS: Ninety-one junior residents completed the study. Their self-evaluations showed statistically significant increases in all 36 items. The effect size was large in 33 items. The family doctors' evaluation was 8-9 points for all 36 items. CONCLUSION: General practice / family medicine training may greatly contribute to the acquisition of various required clinical abilities in postgraduate training even in Japan.

Primary health care practitioners' perception of patient loneliness in Japanese older adults: A cross-sectional study.

Loneliness is a serious social issue in Japan. We aimed to examine the frequency and patient characteristics of Japanese family physicians and nurses overlooking or misjudging patient loneliness. This cross-sectional study involved 470 patients aged 50 years or older who visited two family medicine clinics in Fukushima Prefecture in August 2020. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-squared test and logistic regression models. Patient loneliness was self-assessed using the University of California's Los Angeles Loneliness Scale. Family physicians and nurses assessed patient loneliness prior to the consultation by independently reviewing medical records for the previous 6 months. For family physicians, the proportion of misjudging loneliness, in which patients self-assessed as not lonely but were perceived to be lonely, was 20.2%. The proportion overlooking loneliness, in which patients self-assessed as lonely but were perceived not to be lonely, was 20.9%. Similarly for nurses, the proportions of misjudging and overlooking loneliness were 9.6% and 29.8%, respectively. The odds of a family physician overlooking loneliness was significantly higher for unmarried, divorced, or bereaved patients than for married (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-3.50), and for patients not participating in community activities compared with those participating (aOR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.24-3.54). The odds of a nurse misjudging a patient as lonely was significantly higher for unmarried, divorced, or bereaved patients than for married (aOR: 3.02; 95% CI: 1.24-7.36) and for patients living alone compared with those cohabiting with someone (aOR: 3.61; 95% CI: 1.17-11.17). The odds of a nurse overlooking loneliness was significantly higher for patients who did not participate in community activities (aOR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.26-3.06). These findings indicate that perceiving patient loneliness based on marital status, living arrangements, and involvement in community activities is difficult for family physicians and nurses in Japan.

Impact of general practice / family medicine clerkships on Japanese medical students: Using text mining to analyze reflective writing.

BACKGROUND: In order for general practice / family medicine clerkships to be improved in undergraduate medical education, it is necessary to clarify the impacts of general practice / family medicine clerkships. Using text mining to analyze the reflective writing of medical students may be useful for further understanding the impacts of clinical clerkships on medical students. METHODS: The study involved 125 fifth-year Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine students in the academic year 2018-2019. The settings were three clinics and the study period was 5 days. The clerkships included outpatient and home visits. Students' reflective writing on their clerkship experience was collected on the final day. Text mining was used to extract the most frequent words (nouns) from the reflective writing. A co-occurrence network map was created to illustrate the relationships between the most frequent words. RESULTS: 124 students participated in the study. The total number of sentences extracted was 321 and the total number of words was 10,627. The top five frequently-occurring words were patient, home-visit, medical practice, medical care, and family. From the co-occurrence network map, a co-occurrence relationship was recognized between home-visit and family. CONCLUSION: Data suggest that medical students may learn the necessity of care for the family as well as the patient in a home-care setting.

All-Cause Mortality After the Great East Japan Earthquake in Fukushima Prefecture: Trends From 2009 to 2016 and Variation by Displacement.

OBJECTIVES: On March 11, 2011, a magnitude 9 earthquake (the Great East Japan Earthquake) occurred off the east coast of Japan. After the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accidents, as of 2016, people were not allowed to live in the 6 districts (Tomioka, Okuma, Futaba, Namie, Katsurao, Iidate) in Fukushima Prefecture. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of displacement on all-cause mortality in Fukushima Prefecture. METHODS: Data regarding population and deaths from 2009 to 2016 in Fukushima Prefecture were obtained from the governmental statistics. The age-adjusted all-cause mortality were compared among the 4 areas in Fukushima Prefecture; the Eastern, Middle, Western, and Displacement areas. RESULTS: The age-adjusted all-cause mortality rates in the Eastern and Displacement areas were higher than in the other 2 areas from 2009 to 2011. During the period from 2012 to 2016, all-cause mortality in the Displacement area decreased to the lowest, while the morality in the Eastern area remained the highest. CONCLUSIONS: Against all expectations, after the earthquake, all-cause mortality in the Displacement area was continuously lower than in the rest of the Fukushima Prefecture. Following disasters, long-term monitoring should be organized to meet local health-care needs.

Interventions for body weight reduction in obese patients during short consultations: an open-label randomized controlled trial in the Japanese primary care setting.

BACKGROUND: Family physicians should maintain regular contact with obese patients to ensure they effectively reduce their body weight. However, family physicians in Japan have on average only 6 (min) per consultation, and conventional interventions for body weight reduction require a longer consultation or additional manpower. A brief intervention within the limited consultation time available is therefore needed. Here we investigated the effectiveness of a brief weight reduction intervention for obese patients and the related factors for reducing body weight during routine consultations in the primary care setting. METHOD: We conducted an open-label randomized controlled trial at a family medicine clinic in Fukushima, Japan from January 2010 to June 2011. Patients aged 30 to 69 years with body mass index ≥25 who were diagnosed with hypertension, dyslipidemia, and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. At every consultation, body weight in the intervention group was measured by a family physician who provided weight reduction advice in addition to usual care. The primary outcome was body weight change at 1-year follow up. Analysis was done by intention to treat. RESULT: We randomly assigned 29 participants to the intervention group and 21 to the control group. Forty participants (80 %) remained in the trial until the 1-year follow up. At follow up, the median body weight change from baseline was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.68), at -0.8 (interquartile range [IQR] -2.5 to 1.0) kg in the intervention group and 0.2 (IQR -2.4 to 0.8) kg in the control group. CONCLUSION: We devised an intervention method for physicians to measure body weight and advise on weight reduction during routine consultations. In our setting, this method did not extend the consultation time, but also had no significant additional effects on body weight reduction in moderately obese patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000002967).