Prospective assessment of the quality of life and nipple sensation after gender-affirming chest surgery.

BACKGROUND: In the existing literature, assessing transgender patients' quality of life after surgery, especially using standardized surveys, is rare. The nipple sensation regarding the operating technique has neither been studied in a prospective nor standardized way. METHODS: For one year, we prospectively assessed transgender patients operated on for a gender-affirming chest surgery in our unit. Each patient answered the BREAST-Q© survey and the BODY-Q© chest module survey before and six months after the surgery. In addition, a measure of nipple sensation was performed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments pre-and post-operatively to compare surgical techniques. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (102 breasts) were included in our study. The average age was 23.1 years and the average BMI was 24.8 kg/m2. Twenty-one patients (45%) had double incision and free nipple graft mastectomy, 14 (27%) patients had double incision and inferior pedicle mastectomy, while the 14 (27%) other patients had a semi-circular technique. Our study shows an improvement in all the scores of the surveys after surgery (p < 0.0001). Patients with double incision and inferior pedicle mastectomies rated a significantly higher satisfaction with nipples (p = 0.013) and significantly better sexual well-being (p = 0.007) than other techniques. In addition, preservation of nipple sensation was shown in patients operated by semi-circular technique (p < 0.001) and inferior pedicle technique (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our prospective study confirms the significant improvement in the quality of life of transgender patients after chest gender-affirming surgery. Double incision with inferior pedicle seems to provide better satisfaction with nipples, higher sexual well-being, and preservation of nipple sensation.

How to measure vessel caliber in microsurgery and super-microsurgery? Metrological study of three methods applicable in clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: The microsurgical literature reports the vascular calibers of the vessels studied even though the method of measurement of these vessels is very rarely reported. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We performed a metrological study evaluating three methods to measure the external calibers of catheters corresponding to microsurgical and super-microsurgical vessels (1.2 mm, 0.8 mm, and 0.6 mm). Six evaluators measured 15 catheters of three different hidden diameters by each of the three methods applicable in clinical practice: standard graduated ruler, Shinwa® micrometric ruler, and ImageJ® software from a photograph. Accuracy and reliability of the measurements were assessed by studying the inter- and intra-rater and inter-method coefficients (variants of the intra-class coefficient (ICC)) and analysis of the IC95% of the ICCs. RESULTS: Intra class correlation ICC "intra-rater" coefficient finds for the standard rule 0.81 [0.65-0.93], Shinwa® rule 0.86 [0.67-0.96], and for the ImageJ® software 0.97 [0.94-0.99]. The "Inter-rater" ICC shows respectively the coefficient 0.51 [0.23 and max 0.93], 0.87 [0.75-0.95], and 0.95 [0.89-0.98]. It appears that the graduated decimeter is the least reliable method of measurement, the Shinwa® ruler presents acceptable reliability but requires the purchase of equipment. The reliability of ImageJ® software is the best and appears to be the most reliable method. CONCLUSION: Our original study, with no equivalent in the scientific literature, demonstrates objectively the great accuracy and reliability of a method of measurement of vascular calibers in micro and super microsurgery using intraoperative photography and the use of free computer software.