Phase 3 RCT comparing docetaxel-platinum with docetaxel-platinum-5FU as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in borderline resectable oral cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5FU) is one of the treatment options in very locally advanced oral cancer with a survival advantage over PF (cisplatin and 5FU). TP (docetaxel and cisplatin) has shown promising results with a lower rate of adverse events but has never been compared to TPF. METHODS: In this phase 3 randomized superiority study, adult patients with borderline resectable locally advanced oral cancers were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either TP or TPF. After the administration of 2 cycles, patients were evaluated in a multidisciplinary clinic and further treatment was planned. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events. RESULTS: 495 patients were randomized in this study, 248 patients in TP arm and 247 in TPF arm. The 5-year OS was 18.5% (95% CI 13.8-23.7) and 23.9% (95% CI 18.1-30.1) in TP and TPF arms, respectively (Hazard ratio 0.778; 95% CI 0.637-0.952; P = 0.015). Following NACT, 43.8% were deemed resectable, but 34.5% underwent surgery. The 5-year OS was 50.7% (95% CI 41.5-59.1) and 5% (95%CI 2.9-8.1), respectively, in the surgically resected versus unresected cohort post NACT (P < 0.0001). Grade 3 or above adverse events were seen in 97 (39.1%) and 179 (72.5%) patients in the TP and TPF arms, respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: NACT with TPF has a survival benefit over TP in borderline resectable oral cancers, with an increase in toxicity which is manageable. Patients who undergo surgery achieve a relatively good, sustained survival.

An Audit of Systemic Therapy in Medullary Carcinoma Thyroid.

There is a paucity of evidence of the impact of sorafenib on MCT and it is the preferred therapy used in India. We decided to do an audit of all patients of MCT who were referred to us for systemic therapy. The objective of this exercise was to identify the treatment pattern, outcomes, and adverse events with therapy in MCT. Baseline demographics (age, gender, ECOG PS, comorbidities, habits), tumor details (site of metastasis), previous treatment details, clinical features at metastasis (symptomatic or asymptomatic), the pattern of treatment, adverse events (CTCAE version 4.02), date of progression, date of death and status, and follow-up were extracted from the rare tumor database and electronic medical records. Out of 75 patients referred for therapy for MCT, 47 (62.7%) patients were considered for immediate tyrosine kinase inhibitors as they had symptomatic status and 28 (37.3%) patients were kept on observation due to the asymptomatic nature of the disease. Out of the 28 patients, 15 (53.6%, n = 28) patients were subsequently started on TKI while in 13 (46.4%, n = 28) patients observation was continued. In the overall cohort, the median PFS was 18.9 months (95% CI 11.9-29.9) and OS was 26.6 months (95% CI 14.4-39.0). Among variables tested, only female gender had an impact on PFS (hazard ratio = 0.364 95% CI 0.148-0.895; P = 0.028) and the absence of lung metastasis had a positive impact on OS (hazard ratio = 0.443 95% CI 0.207-0.95; P = 0.037). Most commonly used TKI was sorafenib (n = 61) and sunitinib in 1 patient. The most common adverse events with TKI were palmo-plantar dysesthesia (50, 80.6%) and oral mucositis (25, 40.2%). The strategy of treating symptomatic MCT and observing in asymptomatic MCT is associated with reasonable PFS and OS. Sorafenib is the most commonly used TKI in our setup and provides similar outcomes as globally.

Anaplastic Cancer: Our Experience.

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is a rare thyroid malignancy with a dire prognosis, nearly 100% disease specific mortality and a median overall survival less than 6 months. In view of the limited data from India on anaplastic thyroid cancer, we conducted this audit to analyze the treatment pattern, outcomes and factors influencing it. This is a retrospective analysis of outcomes of patients treated in a single institution between January 2008 and December 2020. Baseline characteristics, treatment received, and outcomes among adult patients with ATC were collected. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. SPSS version 20 and RStudio version 3.1.1 were used for analysis. In this cohort of 134 patients, the median age at diagnosis was 59 years, with 63.4% of them being females. At presentation, 70.9% of them had good performance status (PS 0-1). Only 38.8% received treatment with curative intent (either surgery fb adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy fb surgery and adjuvant or definitive chemoradiotherapy) while 61.2% patients received palliative treatment (either palliation alone or palliative chemotherapy or palliative surgery or palliative RT). Predominant pattern of progression was local progression (79.8%). Median PFS and OS of the overall cohort were 58 days and 80 days respectively. PFS and OS were significantly better in patients treated with curative intent vs palliative intent (116 and 134 days vs 45 and 50 days; p = 0.00 and 0.00 respectively). Among patients treated with curative intent, OS was significantly better in patients undergoing surgery vs CTRT (155 vs 76 days; p = 0.03). Among patients treated with upfront surgery, both PFS and OS were better with the addition of adjuvant CTRT/RT vs no adjuvant (332 and 540 days vs 55 and 91 days; p = 0.00 and 0.003 respectively). ATC is a rare cancer with dismal prognosis. Local therapy with surgery followed adjuvant seems to be associated with the better outcomes. Systemic therapy seems to be a better option for palliation. Our data reflects the real world data of this rare cancer.