Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Malays Orthop J ; 9(3): 35-39, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28611907

RESUMO

Corticotomy is an essential procedure for deformity correction and there are many techniques described. However there is no proper classification of the fracture pattern resulting from corticotomies to enable any studies to be conducted. We performed a retrospective study of corticotomy fracture patterns in 44 patients (34 tibias and 10 femurs) performed for various indications. We identified four distinct fracture patterns, Type I through IV classification based on the fracture propagation following percutaneous corticotomy. Type I transverse fracture, Type II transverse fracture with a winglet, Type III presence of butterfly fragment and Type IV fracture propagation to a fixation point. No significant correlation was noted between the fracture pattern and the underlying pathology or region of corticotomy.

2.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol ; 37(5): 396-401, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22019989

RESUMO

The use of bicortical screws to fix metacarpal fractures has been suggested to provide no added biomechanical advantage over unicortical screw fixation. However, this was only demonstrated in static loading regimes, which may not be representative of biological conditions. The present study was done to determine whether similar outcomes are obtained when cyclic loading is applied. Transverse midshaft osteotomies were created in 20 metacarpals harvested from three cadavers. Fractures were stabilised using 2.0 mm mini fragment plates fixed with either bicortical or unicortical screw fixation. These fixations were tested to failure with a three-point bending cyclic loading protocol using an electromechanical microtester and a 1 kN load cell. The mean load to failure was 370 N (SD 116) for unicortical fixation and 450 N (SD 135) for bicortical fixation. Significant differences between these two constructs were observed. A biomechanical advantage was found when using bicortical screws in metacarpal fracture plating.


Assuntos
Parafusos Ósseos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Metacarpo/lesões , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Densidade Óssea , Placas Ósseas , Desenho de Equipamento , Análise de Falha de Equipamento , Fraturas Ósseas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Teste de Materiais , Osteotomia
3.
Injury ; 42(8): 782-9, 2011 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21329922

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The use of bone grafts in treating non- or delayed unions as the result of large bone loss is well established. However, despite good outcomes, the time to achieve complete union is still considerably long. To overcome this problem, the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been advocated albeit with varying success. To determine the true effectiveness of PRP in treating non-/delayed unions, a study was conducted using (n=12) rabbit models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Critical-sized defects measuring 2cm created in the midshaft of the right rabbit tibias were stabilised using 2.7-mm small fragment plates. A spacer placed in the defects to create a delay in bone union was replaced at 3 weeks with artificial bone grafts (Coragraft®), with or without PRP. The operated limbs were radiographed following the defect creation and at 3, 7 and 11 weeks (at sacrifice). Bone healing and histological changes were later assessed and scored using the appropriate grading systems. Four groups were compared for quality of healing: (group-A) control group, that is, no PRP or Coragraft; (group-B) PRP; (group-C) Coragraft; and (group-D) PRP and Coragraft. RESULTS: Group-D demonstrated the best bone healing based on radiological, histological and gross findings (Kruskall-Wallis: p<0.05). Group-C had significantly higher scores than group-B, whilst group-A had significantly lower scores than all other groups (Mann-Whitney U: p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of PRP with bone graft significantly improves the quality of bone healing. However, the use of PRP without bone substitute does not provide adequate repair tissue and, therefore, provides little benefit when used independently.


Assuntos
Regeneração Óssea/fisiologia , Transplante Ósseo/fisiologia , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas não Consolidadas/terapia , Plasma Rico em Plaquetas/fisiologia , Fraturas da Tíbia/terapia , Animais , Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Fraturas não Consolidadas/fisiopatologia , Coelhos , Fraturas da Tíbia/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA