Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Nanodropper Device for Pupillary Dilation and Cycloplegia in Children.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the noninferiority of 10.4 µl of eye drops eluted with a commercially available eye drop adapter, the Nanodropper (Nanodropper, Inc), on pupillary dilation and cycloplegia in children compared with the standard of care (SOC), 50 µl of eye drops. DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric patients scheduled for routine pupillary dilation at the University of California, San Francisco, at the Pediatric Ophthalmology Clinic were enrolled. Each participant provided 1 eye for the intervention group (Nanodropper) and 1 eye for the control group (SOC). METHODS: Participants were randomized to receive small-volume dilating drops in 1 eye (Nanodropper) and SOC dilating drops in the other eye. Dilation was performed using 1 drop each of 1% cyclopentolate, 1% tropicamide, and 2.5% phenylephrine. Refraction and pupillometry were obtained before and 30 minutes after dilation. A noninferiority analysis was performed to assess change from before to after dilation in spherical equivalent and in pupil constriction percentage and maximum pupil diameter after dilation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Spherical equivalent, maximum pupil diameter, and pupil constriction percentage. RESULTS: One hundred eyes of 50 patients were included, with a mean ± standard deviation age of 9 ± 3 years. After controlling for baseline measurements, the spherical equivalent after dilation was 0.05 diopter (D) more (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.28 to 0.37 D) in the Nanodropper arm, which did not achieve noninferiority. Maximum pupil diameter after dilation was lower in the Nanodropper group (mean, -0.01 mm; 95% CI, -0.20 to -0.03), which did achieve noninferiority. Constriction percentage after dilation was 0.57 percentage points more (95% CI, -1.38 to 2.51 percentage points) in the Nanodropper group, which did not achieve noninferiority. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of eye drops using a small-volume adapter demonstrated similar efficacy to SOC in a pediatric population. Strict noninferiority was met only for pupillary dilation and not for cycloplegia or constriction percentage; however, the small differences in the effect of the Nanodropper versus SOC on all primary outcomes were not clinically significant. We conclude that small-volume eye drops have the potential to decrease unnecessary medical waste and medication toxicity while maintaining therapeutic effect. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Surgical Outcomes of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation with Postoperative Use of Prednisolone Acetate versus Difluprednate.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of postoperative topical prednisolone acetate and difluprednate on surgical outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: The study population consisted of 102 eyes of 90 patients, including 52 eyes that received 1% prednisolone acetate (Pred Forte [PF]; Allergan Inc) and 50 eyes that received 0.05% difluprednate (Durezol [DZ]; Novartis Inc). METHODS: The medical records of consecutive patients who underwent AGV implantation at the University of California, San Francisco, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients in the PF group received 1% prednisolone acetate 6 to 8 times per day tapered over 5 to 6 months postoperatively, and patients in the DZ group received 0.05% difluprednate 4 times daily tapered over 4 months postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications, visual acuity (VA), postoperative complications, and the rate of treatment success. RESULTS: At 1 year, the IOPs (mean ± standard deviation) were 12.4 ± 3.7 mmHg in the DZ group and 13.0 ± 4.0 mmHg in the PF group (P = 0.49). The numbers of glaucoma medications were 0.72 ± 0.71 in the DZ group and 1.09 ± 0.91 in the PF group (P = 0.04), with reductions from baseline of 2.5 ± 1.0 glaucoma medications in the DZ group and 1.8 ± 1.6 glaucoma medications in the PF group (P = 0.01). The logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VAs (mean ± standard deviation) were 0.55 ± 0.80 in the DZ group and 0.59 ± 0.65 in the PF group after 1 year of follow-up (P = 0.81). The cumulative probabilities of success were 95.8% in the DZ group and 93.5% in the PF group at 1 year (P = 0.61). Postoperative complications occurred in 4 eyes (7.7%) in the DZ group and 6 eyes (12%) in the PF group (P = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: After 1 year, postoperative treatment with 0.05% difluprednate after AGV implantation resulted in a similar IOP, with the use of fewer glaucoma medications, compared with postoperative treatment with 1% prednisolone acetate. The rates of treatment success and surgical complications were comparable between the 2 groups during the first year of follow-up.

Biocompatibility and feasibility of VisiPlate, a novel ultrathin, multichannel glaucoma drainage device.

BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is the leading cause of blindness worldwide. Glaucoma drainage devices and minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) often present with tradeoffs in safety and durability of efficacy. Using a rabbit model, we examined the biocompatibility and feasibility of VisiPlate, a novel, ultrathin, tubeless subconjunctival shunt comprised of a network of microchannels. METHODS: Six naive female New Zealand White rabbits received implants (three only in the right eye with contralateral eye untreated and three in both eyes) composed of a 400-nm-thick aluminum oxide core coated with 2 µm of parylene-C, manufactured with microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) techniques. Tonometry, slit lamp exam, clinical exam, fluorescein patency testing, and histopathology were performed. RESULTS: VisiPlate demonstrated IOP-lowering of 20-40% compared to baseline at each time point over the course of 3 months in the nine implanted eyes. All eyes developed blebs over the implant, and fluorescein testing demonstrated fluid patency at 22 days post-implantation. Slit lamp and clinical observations showed that VisiPlate was well tolerated, with low levels of conjunctival congestion, conjunctival swelling, aqueous flare, hyphema, and iris involvement from surgery that resolved over time. At sacrifice time points of 93 days and 180 days, the only notable observations were mild levels of conjunctival congestion in implanted eyes. Histopathology showed minimal tissue response and no obvious inflammation, fibrosis, or necrosis around the implant. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this in vivo study demonstrate the biocompatibility and IOP-lowering effect of a multichannel, ultrathin subconjunctival shunt in a rabbit model. The data suggest that VisiPlate may safely enhance aqueous outflow and significantly reduce intraocular pressure.