Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Single- and Multiple-Ascending Doses of Sunobinop in Healthy Participants.

Sunobinop is an investigational, potent, selective partial agonist at the nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptor in vitro. Three phase 1 studies were conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of escalating single- and multiple-dose administration of sunobinop in healthy participants. Study 1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose study. Study 2 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-ascending dose study. Study 3 was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 4-way crossover study of oral and sublingual sunobinop comparing morning (AM) and bedtime (PM) administration. Seventy participants were included. Systemic exposure (peak plasma concentration [Cmax], area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of last quantifiable concentration [AUC0-t], and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity [AUCinf]) of sunobinop was characterized by dose proportionality from 0.6 to 2 mg and increased less than proportionally from 3 to 30 mg. The PKs of sunobinop were similar, regardless of AM or PM administration, for both the oral and sublingual formulations. The majority of absorbed sunobinop was excreted unchanged in the urine within 8 hours of dosing, thereby showing rapid elimination with no appreciable accumulation following 14 consecutive days of once-daily dosing and suggesting exclusive renal elimination. Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild in severity; 1 severe TEAE occurred and all TEAEs resolved by the end of the studies. Sunobinop was generally well-tolerated and safe across the range of doses evaluated and presents a clinical profile suitable for continued development.

The nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor partial agonist sunobinop promotes non-REM sleep in rodents and patients with insomnia.

The potent and partial agonist sunobinop activates the nociceptin/orphanin-FQ peptide receptor and promotes non-REM sleep in rodents and patients with insomnia.

Hyperthermia induced by transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1) antagonists in human clinical trials: Insights from mathematical modeling and meta-analysis.

Antagonists of the transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1) channel alter body temperature (Tb) in laboratory animals and humans: most cause hyperthermia; some produce hypothermia; and yet others have no effect. TRPV1 can be activated by capsaicin (CAP), protons (low pH), and heat. First-generation (polymodal) TRPV1 antagonists potently block all three TRPV1 activation modes. Second-generation (mode-selective) TRPV1 antagonists potently block channel activation by CAP, but exert different effects (e.g., potentiation, no effect, or low-potency inhibition) in the proton mode, heat mode, or both. Based on our earlier studies in rats, only one mode of TRPV1 activation - by protons - is involved in thermoregulatory responses to TRPV1 antagonists. In rats, compounds that potently block, potentiate, or have no effect on proton activation cause hyperthermia, hypothermia, or no effect on Tb, respectively. A Tb response occurs when a TRPV1 antagonist blocks (in case of hyperthermia) or potentiates (hypothermia) the tonic TRPV1 activation by protons somewhere in the trunk, perhaps in muscles, and - via the acido-antithermogenic and acido-antivasoconstrictor reflexes - modulates thermogenesis and skin vasoconstriction. In this work, we used a mathematical model to analyze Tb data from human clinical trials of TRPV1 antagonists. The analysis suggests that, in humans, the hyperthermic effect depends on the antagonist's potency to block TRPV1 activation not only by protons, but also by heat, while the CAP activation mode is uninvolved. Whereas in rats TRPV1 drives thermoeffectors by mediating pH signals from the trunk, but not Tb signals, our analysis suggests that TRPV1 mediates both pH and thermal signals driving thermoregulation in humans. Hence, in humans (but not in rats), TRPV1 is likely to serve as a thermosensor of the thermoregulation system. We also conducted a meta-analysis of Tb data from human trials and found that polymodal TRPV1 antagonists (ABT-102, AZD1386, and V116517) increase Tb, whereas the mode-selective blocker NEO6860 does not. Several strategies of harnessing the thermoregulatory effects of TRPV1 antagonists in humans are discussed.

Oral Abuse Potential, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of Once-Daily, Single-Entity, Extended-Release Hydrocodone (HYD) in Recreational Opioid Users.

OBJECTIVES: A once-daily, extended-release hydrocodone bitartrate tablet with abuse-deterrent properties (Hysingla ER [HYD]) is available for the treatment of chronic pain in appropriate patients. This study evaluated the oral abuse potential and pharmacokinetics (PK) of HYD intact, chewed, or milled to fine particles in comparison with hydrocodone solution or placebo. DESIGN: Single-center, double-blind, randomized, five-period, five-treatment crossover study. SUBJECTS: Healthy adult, nondependent, recreational opioid users. METHODS: Forty subjects received orally administered treatments of hydrocodone 60 mg solution, HYD 60 mg intact, HYD 60 mg chewed, HYD 60 mg milled to fine particles, or placebo, separated by a five- to seven-day washout. Assessments over 36 hours postdose included subjective measures of drug liking and willingness to take drug again (assessed using visual analog scales [VAS]), pupillometry, PK, and safety measures. RESULTS: Following oral administration, HYD intact, HYD chewed, and HYD fine particles led to significantly lower "at this moment" drug liking compared with hydrocodone solution. HYD intact and chewed were significantly different from hydrocodone solution on overall drug liking, take drug again, and good effects. Pupil constriction, as measured by pupillometry, occurred later with HYD intact and HYD chewed than with hydrocodone solution. Across treatments (hydrocodone solution, HYD fine particles, HYD chewed, and HYD intact, respectively), mean C max and rate of absorption (C max /T max ) values decreased, respectively, and median T max values increased, respectively. Safety was consistent with the known effects of opioid agonists. CONCLUSION: HYD demonstrated reduced oral abuse potential compared with hydrocodone solution in healthy adult, nondependent, recreational opioid users.

A randomized, double-blind, positive-controlled, 3-way cross-over human experimental pain study of a TRPV1 antagonist (V116517) in healthy volunteers and comparison with preclinical profile.

This experimental, translational, experimental pain, single-center, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, 3-treatment, 3-period cross-over proof-of-concept volunteer trial studied the efficacy of a novel TRPV1 antagonist (V116517) on capsaicin- and UV-B-induced hyperalgesia. Heat and pressure pain thresholds, von Frey stimulus-response functions, and neurogenic inflammation were assessed together with safety. Each treatment period was 4 days. The 3 single oral treatments were 300 mg V116517, 400 mg celecoxib (a COX-2 inhibitor), and placebo. The heat pain detection and tolerance thresholds were increased significantly (P < 0.0001) by V116517. Heat pain detection and tolerance thresholds showed significantly less capsaicin hyperalgesia after V116517 (P = 0.004 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Celecoxib reduced UV-B-provoked pressure pain sensitization (P = 0.01). Laser Doppler flowmetry and erythema index after UV-B were significantly (P < 0.0001) reduced by celecoxib. Stimulus-response function in capsaicin-treated areas showed significant differences between both celecoxib and placebo and between V116517 and placebo. The body temperature showed no change, and no side effects were reported for any of the treatments. The TRPV1 antagonists and the COX-2 inhibitor showed different antihyperalgesic profiles indicating different clinical targets. In addition, the preclinical profile of V116517 in rat models of UV-B and capsaicin-induced hypersensitivity was compared with the human experimental data and overall demonstrated an alignment between 2 of the 3 end points tested. The TRPV1 antagonist showed a potent antihyperalgesic action without changing the body temperature but heat analgesia may be a potential safety issue.

Intranasal Abuse Potential, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of Once-Daily, Single-Entity, Extended-Release Hydrocodone (HYD) in Recreational Opioid Users.

OBJECTIVES: A once-daily, extended-release hydrocodone bitartrate tablet with abuse-deterrent properties (Hysingla ER® [HYD]) is available for the treatment of chronic pain in appropriate patients. This study evaluated the intranasal abuse potential and pharmacokinetics of HYD coarse and fine particles vs hydrocodone powder or placebo. DESIGN: Single-center, double-blind, positive- and placebo-controlled, randomized, four-treatment crossover study. SUBJECTS: Healthy adult, nondependent, recreational opioid users with a history of intranasal abuse. METHODS: During four treatment periods, subjects (N = 31) received hydrocodone powder 60 mg, HYD coarse particles 60 mg, HYD fine particles 60 mg, or placebo, with five-to-seven-day washouts between treatments. Measures over 36 hours postdose included drug-liking and willingness to take drug again, assessed using visual analog scales (VASs), pupillometry, intranasal irritation, and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Insufflation of both HYD coarse and fine particles led to lower "At this Moment" Drug Liking VAS peak values compared with hydrocodone powder, but higher values compared with placebo (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Similar results were observed for Overall Drug Liking VAS, Take Drug Again VAS, and Subjective Drug Value. Compared with hydrocodone, insufflation of HYD particles led to reduced miosis and increased nasal irritation. Mean hydrocodone Cmax following insufflation of HYD coarse particles, HYD fine particles, and hydrocodone powder was 27.5, 36.5, and 105.8 ng/mL, respectively; median Tmax was ≥2-fold longer with either HYD particle size than hydrocodone powder; and (Cmax/Tmax) was 9.5, 13.4, and 82.0 ng/mL/h, respectively. Safety was consistent with that of opioid agonists. CONCLUSIONS: HYD demonstrated reduced intranasal abuse potential compared with hydrocodone powder.

Pharmacokinetic Profile and Sustained 24-hour Analgesia of a Once-daily Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-release Tablet with Abuse-deterrent Properties.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and 24-hour analgesic effectiveness of once-daily, single-entity, extended-release hydrocodone (HYD) with abuse-deterrent properties. METHODS: Four studies were included. Three open-label PK studies had the following designs: single-dose, 5-treatment, 4-period, crossover, dose-proportionality study; HYD 120 mg for 5 days (steady-state study 1); 2-treatment, 2-period, multiple-dose crossover study assessing the relative bioavailability of HYD 30 mg and hydrocodone 7.5 mg/ibuprofen 200 mg administered every 6 hours (steady-state study 2). A long-term, open-label study assessed the safety and effectiveness of HYD 20 to 120 mg in patients during a 52-week maintenance period. FINDINGS: Thirty-one, 25, and 22 healthy subjects completed the dose-proportionality study, steady-state study 1, and steady-state study 2, respectively, while 410 patients with moderate to severe chronic nonmalignant and non-neuropathic pain completed the long-term effectiveness study. Mean systemic exposure and peak plasma concentration were dose proportional after administration of single doses of HYD 20 to 120 mg. Pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable at day 1 and day 5 after administration of HYD 120 mg once daily. Once-daily HYD 30 mg was associated with lower-fluctuating plasma hydrocodone concentrations compared with immediate-release hydrocodone 7.5 mg/ibuprofen 200 mg administered every 6 hours. In the long-term study, pain control was consistent over the 24-hour dosing interval. IMPLICATIONS: Once-daily HYD exhibits linear, dose-proportional PK properties and is associated with a lower variability in plasma hydrocodone concentrations when compared with an immediate-release hydrocodone combination product. Notably, analgesia provided by HYD is sustained during the 24-hour dosing interval. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01400139 (Study 4).

Effects of paroxetine, a CYP2D6 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetic properties of hydrocodone after coadministration with a single-entity, once-daily, extended-release hydrocodone tablet.

PURPOSE: A single-entity, once-daily, extended-release formulation of hydrocodone bitartrate (HYD) has been developed for the management of moderate to severe chronic pain. Hydrocodone undergoes cytochrome P-450 (CYP)-mediated metabolism involving the CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 isozymes. CYP3A4 yields norhydrocodone, a major inactive metabolite, whereas CYP2D6 yields hydromorphone, a minor active metabolite. This study examined the influence of the coadministration of paroxetine, a strong selective CYP2D6 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetic properties of hydrocodone (and hydromorphone) in healthy adults. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, 2-period, 2-treatment crossover study, 24 healthy subjects received paroxetine 20 mg or placebo once daily for 12 days and an HYD 20-mg tablet on day 10 of each period. FINDINGS: Hydrocodone mean Cmax and t½ and median Tmax values were similar with paroxetine or placebo coadministration (16.8 vs 15.9 ng/mL, 8.5 vs 8.4 hours, and 18.0 vs 18.0 hours, respectively), as were mean AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ values (342.9 vs 325.3 ng · h/mL and 346.3 vs 328.5 ng · h/mL). The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of the hydrocodone AUC and Cmax values were fully within the predetermined range of 80% to 125%, suggesting that there was no effect of multiple doses of paroxetine on systemic exposure to hydrocodone. Mean hydromorphone AUC0-t and Cmax values were decreased with paroxetine versus placebo (0.64 vs 3.8 ng · h/mL and 0.06 vs 0.19 ng/mL), whereas Tmax values remained similar (18.0 vs 16.1 hours, respectively). The mean hydromorphone AUC0-∞ value could not be calculated. Both regimens were well tolerated; after HYD administration, the numbers of adverse events were similar between the 2 treatment regimens, and all adverse events were mild. IMPLICATIONS: In this study, the coadministration of single-dose HYD with paroxetine at steady state did not alter systemic exposure to hydrocodone, suggesting that HYD can be coadministered with CYP2D6 inhibitors at therapeutic doses, without dosage modification.

Pharmacokinetics of zolpidem from sublingual zolpidem tartrate tablets in healthy elderly versus non-elderly subjects.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic parameters of sedative-hypnotic medications can be influenced by age and gender. OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed pharmacokinetic parameters of zolpidem, formulated as a sublingual zolpidem tartrate tablet (ZST; Intermezzo®), in healthy elderly males and females (mean age 72 years) and in non-elderly males and females (34 years). METHODS: This was a randomized, single-dose, open-label, two-way crossover study evaluating pharmacokinetic parameters of 1.75 and 3.5 mg dosages of ZST in elderly subjects (n = 22), and 3.5 mg dosages of ZST in non-elderly subjects (n = 24). Main outcome measures were pharmacokinetic parameters, including area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum observed concentration (C(max)), time to reach C(max) (T(max)), elimination half-life (T(½)), and apparent oral clearance (CL/F). RESULTS: Dose proportionality in zolpidem exposure was maintained between 1.75 and 3.5 mg doses for both elderly females and males. With administration of the 3.5 mg dose of ZST to elderly and non-elderly subjects, significantly higher systemic exposure was seen in elderly females (C(max) +44.6 %, P < 0.01; AUC +40.4 %) compared with non-elderly females. However, systemic exposure was only modestly higher in elderly males compared with non-elderly males. Greater exposure was seen in elderly females compared to males (C(max) +46.8 %, P < 0.01; AUC +31.4 %). In this study, exposure between non-elderly females and males was equivalent. Changes in T(½) and T(max) values were not observed, with no significant age effect on oral clearance. There were no apparent differences in tolerability among age and gender groups. CONCLUSION: Elderly individuals were found to have higher C(max) and AUC values compared with non-elderly subjects. C(max) and AUC were greater in elderly women compared with elderly men.

Gender differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem following sublingual administration.

The effect of dose and gender on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of zolpidem after administration of a buffered zolpidem sublingual tablet (ZST; Intermezzo®, Purdue Pharma L.P., Stamford, CT, USA) was evaluated in healthy non-elderly male and female volunteers. Subjects received a single morning dose of ZST (1.0, 1.75, and 3.5 mg) or placebo in a four-way crossover study. In male and female subjects zolpidem PK were linear, with area under the curve (AUC) proportional to dose, and apparent oral clearance and elimination half-life independent of dose. However, AUC averaged 40% to 50% higher in females than in males receiving the same dose. The gender effect was incompletely explained by body weight. In females, ZST produced PD changes consistent with benzodiazepine agonist effects, particularly at the 3.5-mg dose. For several PD variables, PD effects were significantly related to plasma zolpidem concentrations when data were aggregated across subjects. However, there was variability in response among individuals. In males, PD effects of zolpidem seldom differed from placebo regardless of plasma concentration. The findings confirm that zolpidem clearance is lower in females than in males. PD effects of zolpidem from ZST are greater in female subjects, due to a combination of higher plasma concentrations and greater intrinsic sensitivity.

Influence of food on pharmacokinetics of zolpidem from fast dissolving sublingual zolpidem tartrate tablets.

Ingesting food can impact the pharmacokinetics of sedative-hypnotic drugs. A buffered zolpidem sublingual tablet (ZST) recently became available for the treatment of middle-of-the-night awakening. In this randomized, open-label, single-site study, the pharmacokinetic profile of ZST was evaluated when administered while fasting and following a standard high-fat meal (fed state). Healthy adults aged 18-64 years received a single morning dose of 3.5 mg ZST in the fed or fasting state. From 20 min to 3 h post-dose, zolpidem plasma levels were lower in the fed state compared to the fasting state. After 4 h post-dose (corresponding to "morning wake time"), higher zolpidem plasma levels were evident in the fed state. Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values for the 0-8 h interval were 160 ng/mL h in the fed state and 203 ng/mL h in the fasting state (P < .001). In the fed versus fasting states, Cmax was 32.0 ng/mL versus 57.3 ng/mL (P < .001), respectively, and Tmax was 3.0 h versus 0.92 h (P < .001), respectively. Together these data suggest that administration of ZST in the fed state is not optimal for maximizing the likelihood of therapeutic benefit and minimizing the probability of residual sedation.

Comparison of pharmacokinetic profiles of zolpidem buffered sublingual tablet and zolpidem oral immediate-release tablet: results from a single-center, single-dose, randomized, open-label crossover study in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: A zolpidem sublingual tablet (ZST) formulation was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat middle-of-the-night (MOTN) awakening with difficulty returning to sleep. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the zolpidem pharmacokinetic profiles of 3.5-mg ZST and 10-mg immediate-release (IR) oral zolpidem in healthy female and male adults. METHODS: This randomized, open-label crossover study compared the pharmacokinetic profile of ZST with that of IR oral zolpidem in healthy adults. RESULTS: The study enrolled 19 males and 14 females. After 3.5-mg ZST and 10-mg IR, respectively, mean zolpidem plasma concentrations at 15 minutes (22 vs 17 ng/mL, respectively, in females and 18 vs 10 ng/mL in males) and AUCs from zero to 15 minutes (2.3 vs 0.8 ng · h/mL in females and 1.6 vs 0.5 ng · h/mL in males) were substantially greater for ZST, despite the larger absolute IR dose. After 3.5-mg ZST and 10-mg IR, respectively, clearance was lower in females, even after correcting for body weight (2.63 vs 2.88 mL/min/kg in females and 3.63 vs 3.91 mL/min/kg in males). The lag time prior to the start of first-order absorption was notably shorter for ZST than IR in both males (8 vs 21 minutes) and females (5 vs 22 minutes). Both zolpidem formulations were generally well tolerated by both genders. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic exposure of zolpidem was higher in females for both formulations. Plasma levels and AUC were higher, and clearance was lower, in females with both zolpidem formulations. The initial rate of absorption was faster, and initial systemic exposure was greater, with ZST compared with oral IR.

Once-weekly transdermal buprenorphine application results in sustained and consistent steady-state plasma levels.

CONTEXT: Transdermal formulations of buprenorphine offer controlled delivery of buprenorphine for sustained analgesic efficacy with reduced adverse events (AEs) compared with the other modes of administration. A buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) delivering 5, 10, or 20 mcg/hour for seven days is now marketed in the U.S. as Butrans(®) (Lohmann Therapie-System AG, Andernach Germany), a Schedule III single-entity opioid analgesic indicated for the management of moderate and chronic pain in patients requiring continuous around-the-clock analgesia for an extended period. OBJECTIVES: This was a randomized open-label study in healthy subjects to characterize the steady-state buprenorphine pharmacokinetics after the delivery of three consecutive seven-day BTDS applications. METHODS: Thirty-seven subjects were randomized to receive three consecutive BTDS 10 mcg/hour (BTDS 10) patches applied to the deltoid or upper back for seven days each. Blood samples for buprenorphine concentration measurements were taken. Safety was assessed using recorded AEs, clinical laboratory test results, vital signs, pulse oximetry, physical examinations, and electrocardiograms. Patch adhesion assessments were taken. RESULTS: Analysis of Cmin demonstrated that steady state was reached during the first BTDS 10 application. No significant difference in Cmin was observed across the three applications. Total and peak plasma buprenorphine exposures were similar after each of the seven-day administrations of BTDS. CONCLUSION: Three consecutive once-weekly applications of BTDS 10 provided consistent and sustained delivery of buprenorphine. Steady-state plasma concentrations were reached within 48 hours of the first application of BTDS 10. Patch adhesion analysis confirmed the appropriateness of the seven-day application period. Overall, BTDS 10 was safe and well tolerated.

Effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetic profile of buprenorphine following administration of a once-weekly buprenorphine transdermal system.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Buprenorphine is extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. This study evaluated the effect of ketoconazole, a CYP3A4 inhibitor, on the metabolism of buprenorphine following the administration of a buprenorphine transdermal system 10 µg/hour (BTDS 10). METHODS: This single-centre study enrolled 20 healthy subjects who had demonstrated ketoconazole-mediated CYP3A4 inhibition via an erythromycin breath test. Subjects were randomized into a placebo-controlled, two-treatment, two-period crossover study. Subjects participated in a 7- to 14-day screening period, two baseline evaluations (day 0 [period 1] and day 16 [period 2]), two 12-day treatment periods (periods 1 and 2) separated by a 4-day washout period, and a study completion visit. Subjects received one BTDS 10 for 7 days per treatment period, administered concomitantly with either ketoconazole 200 mg twice daily or matching placebo. The main outcome measures were the ratios of geometric means for area under the plasma drug concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero to time of last measurable concentration (AUC(last)), AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC(∞)), and maximum plasma drug concentration (C(max)). RESULTS: The ratio of geometric means (BTDS 10 with ketoconazole/BTDS 10 with placebo) was 99.4 (90% confidence interval [CI] 87.2, 113.3) for AUC(last) and 97.8 (90% CI 87.7, 109.1) for C(max). The ratio of geometric means for AUC(∞) was 86.7 (90% CI 70.7, 106.2). The plasma concentrations of the metabolites norbuprenorphine and norbuprenorphine-3ß-glucuronide were slightly elevated following ketoconazole administration. BTDS 10 with ketoconazole was well tolerated and no apparent safety concerns were noted. CONCLUSION: The lack of a clinically significant CYP3A4 interaction with ketoconazole following transdermal delivery of buprenorphine is consistent with the parenteral administration of a high clearance drug bypassing exposure to gut wall and hepatic CYP3A4 first-pass effects. Metabolism of buprenorphine during therapy with BTDS is also not expected to be affected by co-administration of other CYP3A4 inhibitors.

Pharmacokinetic profile of dexloxiglumide.

Dexloxiglumide is a potent and selective cholecystokinin type 1 (CCK1) receptor antagonist currently under development in a variety of diseases affecting the gastrointestinal tract such as gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), functional dyspepsia, constipation and gastric emptying disorders. In female patients with constipation-predominant IBS, clinical efficacy has been demonstrated following administration of dexloxiglumide 200 mg three times daily. Dexloxiglumide is rapidly and extensively absorbed after single oral administration in humans with an absolute bioavailability of 48%. The incomplete bioavailability is due to both incomplete absorption and hepatic first-pass effect. Following multiple-dose administration of 200 mg three times daily, the accumulation is predictable, indicating time-independent pharmacokinetics. In addition, dexloxiglumide pharmacokinetics are dose-independent after both single and repeated oral three-times-daily doses in the dose range 100-400 mg. Dexloxiglumide absorption window extends from the jejunum to the colon and the drug is a substrate and a weak inhibitor of P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance protein 1. Plasma protein binding of dexloxiglumide is 94-98% and the drug has a moderate to low volume of distribution in humans. Systemic clearance of dexloxiglumide is moderate and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/5 and CYP2C9 have been implicated in the metabolism of dexloxiglumide to produce O-demethyl dexloxi-glumide. This metabolite is further oxidised to dexloxiglumide carboxylic acid. These two major metabolites (accounting for up to 50% of dexloxiglumide elimination) have been identified. However, in human plasma the unchanged drug represents the major (up to 91%) component of the metabolic profile. The parent drug is believed to be the major contributor to the efficacy of the compound, since its major metabolites are pharmacologically inactive. In addition, the drug is a single isomer chiral drug (eutomer) that does not undergo chiral inversion into its pharmacologically inactive enantiomer (distomer). After oral administration of (14)C-dexloxiglumide, radioactivity is mainly excreted in bile and in faeces (74% of dose) with much lower excretion in urine (20% of dose). Renal excretion of unchanged dexloxiglumide is low (7% of dose in urine and faeces, 1% of dose in urine) and is dose-independent in the dose range 100-400 mg. As the kidney is a minor contributor to the elimination of dexloxiglumide and/or its metabolites in humans, the pharmacokinetics of the drug should not be affected in patients with renal insufficiency. The pharmacokinetics of dexloxiglumide are also not affected by age, sex and administration with a high-fat breakfast. Mild and moderate liver impairment do not affect the pharmacokinetics of dexloxiglumide but severe liver impairment causes increases in systemic exposure to dexloxiglumide and O-demethyl dexloxiglumide. Thus, the drug should be prescribed with caution in patients with severe hepatic impairment even though no dose adjustment is warranted. The results of different drug interaction studies have indicated that no clinically relevant metabolic and concomitant drug-drug interactions are expected during the clinical use of dexloxiglumide.

Effect of azole antifungals ketoconazole and fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of dexloxiglumide.

AIMS: Dexloxiglumide is a new CCK(1) receptor antagonist under investigation for treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders and is metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP2C9. The objectives of these two separate randomized, two-period, two-treatment crossover studies were to investigate the effects of steady-state ketoconazole, a model CYP3A4 inhibitor (Study 1), and steady-state fluconazole, a model CYP2C9 inhibitor (Study 2), on the pharmacokinetics of dexloxiglumide in healthy subjects. METHODS: Plasma samples were analysed for dexloxiglumide and its primary metabolites: O-demethyl dexloxiglumide (ODM; Study 1 and 2) and dexloxiglumide carboxylic acid (DCA; Study 2). RESULTS: Following ketoconazole coadministration, dexloxiglumide C(max) increased by 32% (90% confidence intervals (CI) 112-154), with unchanged ODM C(max); AUC of dexloxiglumide and ODM increased by 36% (90% CI 124-140 and 128-142, respectively). No changes were observed in dexloxiglumide or ODM t((1/2)). Fluconazole coadministration caused a 77% increase (90% CI 154-204) in dexloxiglumide C(max), no change in ODM C(max) and a 32% decrease (90% CI 62-75) in DCA C(max). Fluconazole coadministration resulted in a 2.5-fold increase (90% CI 235-267) in dexloxiglumide AUC, 40% increase (90% CI 136-156) in ODM AUC and an 18% decrease (90% CI 82-94) in DCA AUC. The t((1/2)) of all three analytes increased by approximately 2-fold with fluconazole coadministration (P-value < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ketoconazole caused a minimal increase while fluconazole caused a moderate increase in dexloxiglumide systemic exposure with no change in the adverse event profile of dexloxiglumide.

Effect of multiple-dose dexloxiglumide on the pharmacokinetics of oral contraceptives in healthy women.

This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of dexloxiglumide, a selective cholecystokinin receptor antagonist, on the pharmacokinetics of a combination oral contraceptive (OC). A single-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-period crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy young female subjects who received Ortho Tri-Cyclen containing ethinyl estradiol (EE, 0.035 mg) and norgestimate (NE, 0.180 mg/0.215 mg/0.250 mg per 7-day phase, respectively) for 5 days (days 17-21) concurrently with either 200 mg dexloxiglumide (3 times a day on days 17-20, followed by a single dose on day 21) or matching placebo during 2 consecutive 28-day OC dosing cycles. Plasma was sampled up to 24 hours for the determination of EE, NE, and 17-deactyl norgestimate (17-DNE, a rapidly formed pharmacologically active metabolite of NE). The geometric mean ratios (GMRs, dexloxiglumide/placebo) of the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 hours with corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for EE and 17-DNE were 1.21 (1.17-1.26) and 0.92 (0.89-0.95), respectively. The GMRs (90% CI) of C(max) for EE and 17-DNE were 1.15 (1.09-1.20) and 0.93 (0.90-0.96), respectively. Coadministration of OC and dexloxiglumide was well tolerated and safe. Comparable systemic exposure of EE and 17-DNE in the presence and absence of dexloxiglumide suggests that dexloxiglumide treatment is unlikely to interfere with the safety and efficacy of oral contraceptives based on the analysis of the resulting pharmacokinetic profile.

Interaction of dexloxiglumide, a cholecystokinin type-1 receptor antagonist, with human cytochromes P450.

Dexloxiglumide (DEX) is a cholecystokinin type-1 receptor antagonist under development for the treatment of constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Studies of the potential interaction of DEX with human cytochromes P450 (CYPs) were conducted in vitro. DEX (300 micro M), both with and without a 15-min pre-incubation, was incubated with pooled human liver microsomes and substrates selective for each of eight CYPs. This resulted in >30% inhibition of tolbutamide 4-methyl-hydroxylase (CYP2C9/10) and lauric acid 11-hydroxylase (CYP2E1) activities. Mean K(i) (SD) for CYP2C9/10 and CYP2E1 were 69.0 (24.3) and 426 (60) microM, respectively. Incubations of [(14)C]DEX with pooled human liver microsomes produced one major phase I metabolic fraction, with V(max)=131 pmol/min/mg protein and K(m)=23.7 microM. Further incubations with (i) liver microsomes from 16 individual donors (correlation analysis), (ii) Supersomes trade mark and (iii) selective chemical inhibitors, implicated CYP3A4/5, CYP2B6 and CYP2C9 in the formation of this component. Thus, DEX interacts with CYP2C9 both as inhibitor (K(i)=69.0 microM) and as substrate in vitro. However, based on the maximum concentration (27 microM) after repeated oral doses of 200 mg t.i.d. and the unbound fraction (0.03) of DEX in human plasma, no clinically relevant metabolic interactions with other CYP substrates are predicted.