Obstructive jaundice resulted from hydatid cyst of pancreatic head.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Compression of the common bile duct by a hydatid cyst located at the head of the pancreas is one of the quite rare causes of obstructive jaundice in childhood. CASE REPORT: We report a 9-year-old child with obstructive jaundice caused by compression of the intrapancreatic portion of the bile duct by a hydatid cyst located at the pancreatic head. Furthermore, we considered that this is a reportable case in aspect of childhood development. The patient was treated successfully by surgical procedure and albendazole chemoprophylaxis. The postoperative course was uneventful. CONCLUSION: In endemic areas, hydatid cysts should be considered among the differential diagnosis in cystic lesions of any organ including the pancreas.

Effect of stent placement, balloon or cutting balloon dilatation on stricture formation after caustic esophageal burn in rats.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of stent placement prior to stricture development following caustic esophageal burn (CEB) in an animal model. The outcomes after stent placement were also compared with those after balloon dilatation and cutting balloon dilatation performed after stricture development. Groups were compared with regard to stricture development and weight loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 40 rats were divided into 5 groups. CEB was created as described by Gehanno et al. In Group A (control) no CEB was performed and the esophagus was only rinsed with saline. Group B rats underwent CEB with no subsequent treatment. Group C rats underwent CEB followed by balloon dilatation in the 3 (rd) and 4 (th) week. Group D rats underwent CEB followed by cutting balloon dilatation in the 3 (rd) week. Group E rats underwent CEB with subsequent placement of a silicon stent in the same session. The animals were sacrificed in the 6 (th) week, and the stenosis index (SI), collagen deposition, and hydroxyproline (HP) levels were determined in the esophageal segments and statistically compared. RESULTS: Although weight loss occurred in Group C and Group B rats (238.87±15.95 g vs. 233.83±19.01 g), weight loss in Group C rats was less marked compared to Group B. Similarly, the SI in Group C was lower compared to that of Group B and the difference was statistically significant. Although there was no difference in weight between the rats in Group C and Group B before the procedure (p=0.318), there was statistically significant difference thereafter (p=0.002). The SI of Group D was also lower compared with that of Group B, and the difference was statistically significant. Weight gain in Group E rats was similar to that noted in Group A rats and was higher compared to Group B; this difference was statistically significant. The SI for Group E was lower compared to that of Group B. CONCLUSION: Stenting performed at the time of corrosive injury and cutting balloon dilatation performed after stricture formation had a positive effect with regard to SI and weight gain in an animal model.

Omental incarceration may cause hydrocele and this hydrocele confused simple or scrotal hydrocele.

BACKGROUND: The recommended approach to hydrocele repair in children is inguinal. Recently, a transscrotal approach has been recommended for hydroceles in children. This report describes our experience with hydrocele with omentum incarceration. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed the records of ten children who underwent inguinal hydrocele repair with omentum incarceration in our clinic. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 4.5 years (range 1.5-16). Hydroceles were located on the right side in all patients. Scrotal erythema, inguinal pain, signs of intestinal obstruction and hernia sac were not determined. Hydrocele repairs were made by inguinal approach in all patients. The procesus vaginalis was rougher than normal and noted as the hernia sac. Thus, the hernia sacs were opened and omental incarceration was defined in all cases. Omentum protruded into the abdomen in all cases. A high ligation was performed and the distal parts of the sacs were fenestrated. CONCLUSIONS: In the light of our experience, a scrotal approach to hydrocele repair in children would be difficult in cases of incarceration with hernia. Omental incarceration may cause hydrocele, and this hydrocele can be confused with normal hydrocele. Therefore, we would continue to recommend an inguinal approach for childhood hydroceles.

Where should the normal position of the umbilicus be in the neonate?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the normal position of the umbilicus so as to offer a guide to improve cosmetic results after the repair of congenital abdominal wall defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The position of the umbilical center was determined in 187 neonates with respect to the xiphoid process, the center of the umbilicus and the pubis. The distance between the xiphoid process and the center of the umbilicus (XU), between the pubis and the center of the umbilicus (PU) and from the xiphoid process to the pubis (XP) were measured while the babies lay in a supine position. The PU:XU ratio was calculated based on these measurements. RESULTS: Mean XP was 11.93±1.40 cm, mean XU was 7.41±1.08 cm and mean PU was 4.52±0.70 (mean±SD). The PU:XU ratio was calculated as 0.61±0.12 (ratio±SD). CONCLUSION: We suggest that the PU:XU ratio should be 0.61 offering an ideal localization in umbilical reconstruction.