Association Between Cytometric Biomarkers, Clinical Phenotype, and Complications of Common Variable Immunodeficiency.

BACKGROUND: Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is a heterogeneous group of immune disorders. The patients are classified according to the clinical manifestation with the infection-only phenotype (CVIDinf) and CVID with immune dysregulation (CVIDid). METHODS: We performed a retrospective clinical analysis of 64 CVID patients (34 males, 53.13%; mean age: 41.4 years; SD: ±21.4 years). We divided the patients into subgroups according to the clinical manifestation (CVIDinf and CVIDid) and according to B cell phenotypic profiling after performing flow cytometry with the use of the EUROclass classification. We compared clinical manifestations, selected laboratory parameters, and therapy in these groups. All CVIDid patients were tested after the manifestation of complications associated with immune dysregulation and in eight patients during the immunosuppressive treatment (systemic corticosteroids and hydroxychloroquine). RESULTS: Two-thirds of patients in our cohort had symptoms resulting from immune dysregulation. Almost half of the patients had autoimmune complications. A higher proportion of marginal zone B cells was associated with autoimmune complications. A lower percentage of naïve B cells was connected to autoimmunity, whereas a lower proportion of transitional B cells was associated with rheumatic diseases and splenomegaly. Patients with lymphadenopathy had a higher percentage of double-negative T cells and a lower percentage of switched memory B cells. We performed molecular-genetic testing in 28% (n = 17) of patients and found a causal pathogenic variant in 23.5% (n = 4) of this group. CONCLUSION: Based on our results, there is an association between specific cytometric parameters, clinical phenotype, and complications of CVID. The use of the subpopulations of B cells can be helpful in the diagnosis of these specific clinical complications in CVID patients and could help to personalise the therapeutic approach.

The use of ketotifen as long-term anti-inflammatory prophylaxis in children with PFAPA syndrome.

Introduction: Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and adenitis syndrome (PFAPA) is the most frequent periodic fever syndrome in children. Its pathogenesis is still unknown, but some disease-modifying factors were observed. Several medications were tested for the long-term prophylaxis of inflammatory flares; however, none are standardly used. Methods: This prospective clinical trial enrolled 142 children (71 girls, 50%) meeting diagnostic criteria for PFAPA syndrome. We analysed selected clinical characteristics and compared laboratory parameters during the flare and attack-free period (at least two weeks after the attack). Moreover, we assessed the possible therapeutic effect of ketotifen on the duration of attack free-periods and clinical picture. Results: The mean age of patients was 6.81 ± 3.03 years and the mean age of onset of symptoms was 2.31 ± 2.02 years. No significant differences were observed between genders.We recorded a positive family history for PFAPA in 31.69% of patients. Attacks lasted for 2.8 ± 1.2 days, with intervals between attacks of 4 ± 1 weeks. We administered ketotifen in 111 (77.8%) patients, and a positive effect was observed in 86 (77.5%) of patients. We observed prolonged attack-free intervals in patients treated with ketotifen (14.7 ± 8.9 days in comparison with 4.4 ± 1.9 days before the treatment; p<0.001). The used dose of ketotifen was 0.08 ± 0.01 mg/kg/day. Mild side effects were observed in four patients (restlessness, irritability, agitation and constipation). Discussion: Our data supports the use of ketotifen for long-term prophylaxis in children with PFAPA syndrome with positive effects on the attenuation of disease activity and the prolongation of attack-free periods. Further well-designed studies should confirm the preliminary data.

Immune Profile in Patients With COVID-19: Lymphocytes Exhaustion Markers in Relationship to Clinical Outcome.

The velocity of the COVID-19 pandemic spread and the variable severity of the disease course has forced scientists to search for potential predictors of the disease outcome. We examined various immune parameters including the markers of immune cells exhaustion and activation in 21 patients with COVID-19 disease hospitalised in our hospital during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Slovakia. The results showed significant progressive lymphopenia and depletion of lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ and CD19+) in correlation to the disease severity. Clinical recovery was associated with significant increase in CD3+ and CD3+CD4+ T-cells. Most of our patients had eosinopenia on admission, although no significant differences were seen among groups with different disease severity. Non-survivors, when compared to survivors, had significantly increased expression of PD-1 on CD4+ and CD8+ cells, but no significant difference in Tim-3 expression was observed, what suggests possible reversibility of immune paralysis in the most severe group of patients. During recovery, the expression of Tim-3 on both CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ cells significantly decreased. Moreover, patients with fatal outcome had significantly higher proportion of CD38+CD8+ cells and lower proportion of CD38+HLA-DR+CD8+ cells on admission. Clinical recovery was associated with significant decrease of proportion of CD38+CD8+ cells. The highest AUC values within univariate and multivariate logistic regression were achieved for expression of CD38 on CD8+ cells and expression of PD1 on CD4+ cells alone or combined, what suggests, that these parameters could be used as potential biomarkers of poor outcome. The assessment of immune markers could help in predicting outcome and disease severity in COVID-19 patients. Our observations suggest, that apart from the degree of depletion of total lymphocytes and lymphocytes subsets, increased expression of CD38 on CD3+CD8+ cells alone or combined with increased expression of PD-1 on CD3+CD4+ cells, should be regarded as a risk factor of an unfavourable outcome in COVID-19 patients. Increased expression of PD-1 in the absence of an increased expression of Tim-3 on CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ cells suggests potential reversibility of ongoing immune paralysis in patients with the most severe course of COVID-19.