Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neurol Clin Pract ; 12(1): 52-59, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36157621

RESUMO

Background and Objectives: To identify the prevalence of EEG abnormalities in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with neurologic changes, their associated neuroimaging abnormalities, and rates of mortality. Methods: A retrospective case series of 192 adult COVID-19-positive inpatients with EEG performed between March and June 2020 at 4 hospitals: 161 undergoing continuous, 24 routine, and 7 reduced montage EEG. Study indication, epilepsy history, intubation status, administration of sedatives or antiseizure medications (ASMs), metabolic abnormalities, neuroimaging pathology associated with epileptiform abnormalities, and in-hospital mortality were analyzed. Results: EEG indications included encephalopathy (54.7%), seizure (18.2%), coma (17.2%), focal deficit (5.2%), and abnormal movements (4.6%). Epileptiform abnormalities occurred in 39.6% of patients: focal intermittent epileptiform discharges in 25.0%, lateralized periodic discharges in 6.3%, and generalized periodic discharges in 19.3%. Seizures were recorded in 8 patients, 3 with status epilepticus. ASM administration, epilepsy history, and older age were associated with epileptiform abnormalities. Only 26.3% of patients presented with any epileptiform abnormality, 37.5% with electrographic seizures, and 25.7% patients with clinical seizures had known epilepsy. Background findings included generalized slowing (88.5%), focal slowing (15.6%), burst suppression (3.6%), attenuation (3.1%), and normal EEG (3.1%). Neuroimaging pathology was identified in 67.1% of patients with epileptiform abnormalities, over two-thirds acute. In-hospital mortality was 39.5% for patients with epileptiform abnormalities and 36.2% for those without. Risk factors for mortality were coma and ventilator support at time of EEG. Discussion: This article highlights the range of EEG abnormalities frequently associated with acute neuroimaging abnormalities in COVID-19. Mortality rates were high, particularly for patients in coma requiring mechanical ventilation. These findings may guide the prognosis and management of patients with COVID-19 and neurologic changes.

2.
Cancer Med ; 10(15): 5051-5061, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34245128

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Long-term breast cancer survivors are at risk for cardiotoxicity after treatment, but there is insufficient evidence to provide long-term (~10 years) cardiovascular disease (CVD) screening recommendations. We sought to evaluate a tri-modality CVD screening approach. METHODS: This single-arm, feasibility study enrolled 201 breast cancer patients treated ≥6 years prior without CVD at diagnosis. Patients were sub-grouped: cardiotoxic (left-sided) radiation (RT), cardiotoxic (anthracycline-based) chemotherapy, both cardiotoxic chemotherapy and RT, and neither cardiotoxic treatment. Patients underwent electrocardiogram (EKG), transthoracic echocardiogram with strain (TTE with GLS), and coronary artery calcium computed tomography (CAC CT). The primary endpoint was preclinical or clinical CVD. RESULTS: Median age was 50 (29-65) at diagnosis and 63 (37-77) at imaging; median interval was 11.5 years (6.7-14.5). Among sub-groups, 44% had no cardiotoxic treatment, 31.5% had cardiotoxic RT, 16% had cardiotoxic chemotherapy, and 8.5% had both. Overall, 77.6% showed preclinical and/or clinical CVD and 51.5% showed clinical CVD. Per modality, rates of any CVD and clinical CVD were, respectively: 27.1%/10.0% on EKG, 50.0%/25.3% on TTE with GLS, and 50.8%/45.8% on CAC CT. No statistical difference was seen among the treatment subgroups (NS, χ2 test, p = 0.58/p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: This study identified a high incidence of CVD in heterogenous long-term breast cancer survivors, most >10 years post-treatment. Over half had clinical CVD findings warranting follow-up and/or intervention. Each imaging test independently contributed to the detection rate. This provides early evidence that long-term cardiac screening may be of value to a wider group of breast cancer survivors than previously recognized.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Cardiotoxicidade/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Unilaterais da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Unilaterais da Mama/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Antraciclinas/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Cardiotoxicidade/epidemiologia , Cardiotoxicidade/etiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doença das Coronárias/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença das Coronárias/epidemiologia , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Eletrocardiografia/métodos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Coração/efeitos dos fármacos , Coração/efeitos da radiação , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Calcificação Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcificação Vascular/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...