Family Resilience in Primary Caregivers of Children Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate family resilience-defined as the capacity of a family to harness its collective strengths and resources to recover from and adapt to significant adversities or crises effectively-in primary caregivers of children who are deaf and hard of hearing (cDHH) and its association with quality of life, life satisfaction, perceived social support, and loneliness. METHOD: The study involved 108 primary caregivers of cDHH and 139 primary caregivers of children with normal hearing. Participants underwent psychometric evaluations including the Family Resilience Scale, World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment-Brief Form, Satisfaction with Life Scale, UCLA Loneliness Scale, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in almost every scale and its subdimension between the two groups (p < .05). Correlation analysis revealed significant correlations between all scale total scores for both groups (p < .05, .153 < | r | < .737). Quality of life was found to be a significant predictor of family resilience, F(1, 139) = 41.824, R2 = .279, B = 0.495, t = 6.467, p < .001. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the significant impact of having cDHH on caregivers' family resilience, quality of life, life satisfaction, feelings of loneliness, and perceived social support. The results underscore the importance of enhancing caregivers' quality of life as a potential strategy to improve their family resilience. Further research is needed to understand the complex interplay of factors influencing these outcomes.

Reduced Tolerance for Risky Play in Primary Caregivers of Children With Hearing Loss.

PURPOSE: It is known that taking appropriate risks during play is crucial for the development of a child's creativity, problem-solving abilities, resilience, self-confidence, and skills in evaluating risky situations. However, communication problems resulting from hearing loss (HL) can affect a child's ability to hear danger and warning signals during play, potentially leading to injury. This study investigates the attitudes of parents or caregivers with children with HL toward risky play. METHOD: The study included 170 caregivers of children with normal hearing (NH; n = 103) and cochlear implant and/or hearing aids users (n = 67) aged 3-13 years. The primary caregiver completed the Tolerance for Risk in Play Scale (TRIPS), and the caregivers of children with HL also completed the Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life (ABEL) questionnaire. RESULTS: TRIPS total scores were significantly higher in the NH group (p < .05). Mothers of children with HL had lower TRIPS scores than mothers of children with NH (p < .05). Similarly, lower TRIPS scores were found in the lower income group with HL (p < .05). A weak positive correlation was observed between TRIPS and both the ABEL total score (p < .05, r = .207) and ABEL auditory awareness score (p < .05, r = .204) in the hard of hearing group. CONCLUSIONS: The study found that caregivers of children with HL have less tolerance for risky play. Additionally, caregivers of children with better auditory skills were more tolerant of risky play. Therefore, it is suggested that caregivers of children using appropriate hearing devices should be informed that they do not need to be overly restrictive during play, and these children should be encouraged to engage in risky play.

Electrically Evoked Auditory Late Responses as a Novel Method for Cochlear Implant Programming.

HYPOTHESIS: Electrically evoked auditory late responses (eALR) are useful as an objective cochlear implant (CI) fitting method. BACKGROUND: Different objective and behavioral methods are used for CI fitting. However, there is no objective method that indicates that the electrical signal reaches the auditory cortex. eALR is an indicator that electrical signals reach the auditory cortex, so our aim was to investigate the use of eALR as an objective method for CI programming. METHODS: Two different programs were created for 21 unilateral Med-El CI users. In the first program, the most comfortable level (MCL) was adjusted with the electrical stapes reflex threshold (eSRT), and the threshold levels (THR) were behaviorally adjusted according to the user's feedback. In the second program, the MCL level was adjusted to a level where all the components of the eALR were clearly seen, and the user did not feel uncomfortable; the THR levels were adjusted to the lowest level where the eALR P1 wave could be seen. The results of the MCL and THR levels of the two programs and the free field tests conducted with both programs were compared. RESULTS: While MCL levels did not differ significantly between the two programs, a significant difference was observed between THR levels. In addition, no significant difference was found between hearing and speech tests with CI in the free field. CONCLUSION: The results revealed no significant performance difference between the two programs and that eALR could be preferred as an objective method for MCL determination.

The impact of social and demographic features on comprehensive receptive and expressive performance in cochlear implant patients.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to observe the effects of social and demographic factors on the language development of prelingual pediatric cochlear implant patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 2006 and April 2010, 44 children (26 boys, 18 girls; mean age 81.1±16.9 months; range 54 to 115 months) who were prelingually implanted and who had an implant experience of at least 36 months were retrospectively analyzed. Only the patients without mental-motor retardation, cochlear anomaly and revision surgery and who continued their education without any interruption were selected. Receptive and expressive vocabulary tests were performed on these patients. Social and demographic features including gender, implant age, parents' education status and annual income were recorded. The relationship between language development and socio-demographic factors were investigated. RESULTS: Patients implanted before the age of 36 months showed better levels of receptive and expressive language. Children with higher maternal education levels showed significantly better expressive and receptive equivalent language ages. Annual income of the families had significant positive impacts on the language development of the children who were implanted before the age of 36 months. CONCLUSION: Both expressive and receptive language skills over 36 months of implant experience are significantly associated with age at the time of the implant and socio-economic status of the parents.