The effect of different torque wrenches on rotational stiffness in compressive femoral nails: a biomechanical study.

PURPOSE: Rotation instability and locking screws failure are common problems. We aimed to determine optimal torque wrench offering maximum rotational stiffness without locking screw failure. METHODS: We used 10 conventional compression nails, 10 novel compression nails and 10 interlocking nails with 30 composite femurs. We examined rotation stiffness and fracture site compression value by load cell with 3, 6 and 8 Nm torque wrenches using torsion apparatus with a maximum torque moment of 5 Nm in both directions. Rotational stiffness of composite femur-nail constructs was calculated. RESULTS: Rotational stiffness of composite femur-compression nail constructs compressed by 6 Nm torque wrench was 3.27 ± 1.81 Nm/angle (fracture site compression: 1588 N) and 60% more than that compressed with 3 Nm torque wrench (advised previously) with 2.04 ± 0.81 Nm/angle (inter fragmentary compression: 818 N) (P = 0.000). Rotational stiffness of composite-femur-compression nail constructs compressed by 3 Nm torque wrench was 2.04 ± 0.81 Nm/angle (fracture site compression: 818 N) and 277% more than that of interlocking nail with 0.54 ± 0.08 Nm/angle (fracture site compression: 0 N) (P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Rotational stiffness and fracture site compression value produced by 3 Nm torque wrench was not satisfactory. To obtain maximum rotational stiffness and fracture site compression value without locking screw failure, 6 Nm torque wrench in compression nails and 8 Nm torque wrench in novel compression nails should be used.

A novel nail providing more biomechanical rotational and axial stability than conventional interlocking nail in femur complex fracture model.

PURPOSE: Inter-fragmentary rotational and axial instabilities are major challenges in nailing of complex or comminuted fractures. We aimed to compare the inter-fragmentary rotational and axial stability of novel anti-rotation interlocking nail and the conventional interlocking nail in complex or comminuted femur shaft fractures. METHODS: Twenty composite femurs were divided into two groups, 30 mm was resected from the mid-portion of all composite femurs. The inter-fragmentary rotational and axial stabilities were assessed. RESULTS: Between 10-N m external and 6-N m internal rotation torques, mean maximum inter-fragmentary rotational arc motion in the novel nails was 1.63 mm and 291 % less than that of the conventional nails (6.38 mm, P = 0.000). Between 150 N distraction and 2300 N compression, mean axial motion in the novel nails was 0.8 mm and 257 % less than that of the conventional nails (2.86 mm, p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: An anti-rotational novel nail is superior to the conventional interlocking nail in terms of maximum inter-fragmentary rotational and axial stabilities in complex and comminuted femur shaft fractures.