Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis ; 33(4): 209-215, 2022 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35239616

RESUMO

Clinicians experience some challenges due to the lack of standardization of test, although D-dimer is a prognostic marker for COVID-19. We compared the clinical and analytical performances of D-dimer results obtained from different devices, kits and methods in patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Thirty-nine patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 and 24 healthy individuals were included in the study. D-dimer levels were measured with Innovance D-DIMER kit (immunoturbidimetric method) on Sysmex CS-2500 and BCS XP and VIDAS D-Dimer Exclusion II kit (enzyme-linked fluorescence method) on mini VIDAS. The studies of precision, method comparison and clinic performance were performed. The variation coefficients in all systems were within the acceptable imprecision (7.8%). Bias%(12.5%) between BCS XP and Sysmex CS-2500 was lower than the acceptable Bias%(15.5%). Bias% values (19.2% and 33.3%, respectively) between Mini VIDAS with BCS XP and Sysmex CS-2500 were higher than the acceptable Bias%. The correlation coefficients among all systems were 0.89-0.98. For 500 ng/ml FEU, there was almost perfect agreement between BCS XP and Sysmex CS-2500, a moderate agreement between Mini VIDAS and BCS XP and Sysmex CS-2500. The cut-off values for distinguishing between individuals with and withoutCOVID-19 were Mini VIDAS, Sysmex CS-2500 and BCS XP 529, 380 and 390 ng/ml FEU, respectively. The immunoturbidimetric method can be used as an alternative to the enzyme-linked fluorescent method because of satisfactory agreement at the different thresholds proposed for venous thromboembolism. However, it is recommended to follow up COVID-19 with the D-dimer results obtained by the same assay system.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Tromboembolia Venosa , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio , Humanos , Imunoturbidimetria , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico
2.
Turk J Pediatr ; 45(4): 290-4, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14768791

RESUMO

Little is known about the epidemiology of rotavirus infection in Turkey. The aim of the study was to determine the incidence and clinical significance of rotavirus gastroenteritis, in view of the potentially available prevention by rotavirus vaccination. The study also sought to determine possible risk factors for rotavirus gastroenteritis. Therefore, 920 children under five years of age with acute gastroenteritis admitted to three pediatric hospitals in Izmir were studied. Rotavirus was identified in 39.8% of the children. Most children with rotavirus gastroenteritis (80.7%) were younger than two years of age. Marked seasonality of rotavirus gastroenteritis was observed, with a peak incidence from January to March. A total of 91% of rotavirus strains that were typed were of serotypes G 1-4. There was no significant difference among rotavirus-positive and rotavirus-negative patients with regard to family income. Compared with children who were exclusively breast-fed, those who were not exclusively breast-fed were at a two-fold greater risk of rotavirus diarrhea. Rotavirus gastroenteritis was significantly more severe than non-rotavirus gastroenteritis; 69% of children with rotavirus infection had severe gastroenteritis (score > or = 11). In conclusion, rotavirus is the most common cause of severe gastroenteritis among children under five years of age in Izmir. A new potent rotavirus vaccine, when available, will provide effective protection against severe rotavirus infection. Promotion of breast-feeding would augment the impact of rotavirus vaccines in preventing severe childhood diarrhea.


Assuntos
Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Infecções por Rotavirus/epidemiologia , Pré-Escolar , Gastroenterite/classificação , Gastroenterite/virologia , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Rotavirus/classificação , Infecções por Rotavirus/classificação , Estações do Ano , Sorotipagem , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Turquia/epidemiologia
3.
Clin Transplant ; 16(4): 257-61, 2002 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12099981

RESUMO

Tuberculosis (TB) is an unusual infection in transplant recipients. We evaluated (i) the frequency of TB, (ii) the duration to develop the TB infection, and (iii) clinical consequences, in 380 solid-organ recipients from January 1995 to December 2000. A total of 10 (2.63%) patients (eight renal, two liver transplant recipients) were found to have post-transplantation TB. The frequency of TB in this patient population is 8.5-fold higher than the prevalance in the general Turkish population. Tuberculosis developed within 2-33 months after transplantation, with a median of 15 months. In all of these 10 patients, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) was isolated from the culture. All the patients continued to have low dose immunosuppressive treatment, and also quadriple antituberculosis treatment [isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), pyrazinamide (PRZ) and ethambutol (ETB)] has been given. The two recipients had died of disseminated form of TB. Relapse was detected in one patient 6 months after the completion of the treatment. As post-transplant TB infection develops mostly within the first year after transplantation, clinicians should be more careful for early and fast diagnosis and treatment should be started immediately.


Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Transplante de Fígado , Infecções Oportunistas/epidemiologia , Tuberculose/epidemiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Imunossupressores , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Oportunistas/diagnóstico , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Tuberculose/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...