Randomized phase II study of temozolomide and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme.

PURPOSE: Surgery remains the standard treatment for glioma, followed by radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy. Despite multidisciplinary approaches, the median survival time for patients with glioblastoma multiform (GBM) remains at less than 1 year from initial diagnosis. Temozolomide (TMZ), an oral alkylating agent, has shown promising activity in the treatment of malignant gliomas. We conducted a multicenter randomized phase II study comparing the efficacy and safety of TMZ administered concomitantly and sequentially to RT versus RT alone in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty patients with pathologically confirmed, newly diagnosed GBM were randomly assigned (110 assessable patients) to receive either TMZ 75 mg/m(2)/d orally, concomitantly with RT (60 Gy in 30 fractions; group A, n = 57), followed by six cycles of TMZ (150 mg/m(2) on days 1 through 5 and 15 to 19 every 28 days), or RT alone (60 Gy in 30 fractions; group B, n = 53). RESULTS: Median time to progression was 10.8 months in group A and 5.2 months in group B (P = .0001). One-year progression-free survival rate was 36.6% in group A and 7.7% in group B. Median overall survival (OS) time was also significantly better in group A versus group B (13.4 v 7.7 months, respectively; P < .0001), as was the 1-year OS at 56.3% v 15.7% (P < .0001), respectively. Toxicity was mainly hematologic. One patient with grade 4 myelotoxicity died as a result of sepsis. The other side effects were mild. CONCLUSION: TMZ combined with RT (concomitantly and sequentially) seems to be more effective than RT alone in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. The combined-modality treatment was well tolerated.

Protective effect of amifostine during fractionated radiotherapy in patients with pelvic carcinomas: results of a randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether pretreatment with amifostine can reduce treatment-induced toxicity in patients with pelvic malignancies undergoing radiotherapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 205 patients with pelvic malignancies (rectal, 32; bladder, 47; prostate, 40; gynecologic, 86) were randomized to receive RT (Group 1, n = 95) or RT plus amifostine (Group 2, n = 110). The patient characteristics for both treatment groups were well balanced. Amifostine was administered at 340 mg/m(2) i.v., 15 min before RT, with standard antiemetics 30 min before. All patients received conventional RT, radical (65-70 Gy) or postoperative (50 Gy), with 45 Gy given to the whole pelvis at daily fractions of 1.8-2.0 Gy, 5 d/wk. Skin, bowel, bladder, and hematologic toxicities were evaluated according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization Research and Treatment of Cancer scoring system. RESULTS: A significant reduction occurred in acute Grade 2-3 bladder and lower GI tract toxicities in the amifostine group (p <0.05, Weeks 3-7). With a median follow-up of 12 months, few late Grade 2-3 effects were observed in either group. No statistically significant difference between the two groups was observed in terms of response 6 weeks after RT completion (complete response plus partial response, 96.8% in the control and 98.3% in the amifostine arm). Amifostine was well tolerated, with only moderate hypotension occurring in 2 patients and moderate nausea in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this randomized trial support the role of amifostine in reducing acute radiation-related toxicity of the bladder and lower GI tract in patients with pelvic malignancies, without evidence of tumor protection.