Excessive supraventricular ectopic activity and future onset of atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

OBJECTIVES: Although evidence has shown the association of excessive supraventricular ectopic activity (ESVEA) with future development of atrial fibrillation (AF), this relationship is not yet fully understood. This study examines whether ESVEA can predict the future onset of AF, in patients presenting with cryptogenic stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 124 non-AF, consecutive patients, hospitalized for cryptogenic stroke between 2014 and 2015, was retrieved. 24-h inpatient monitoring with Holter was employed to reveal ESVEA, defined as the presence of more than 20 premature atrial complexes per hour (PACs/h) on average, or a more than 5 s duration of the longest supraventricular run (LSVR). After a median follow-up period of 5.2 years, the patients were examined for AF. RESULTS: From initial 124 patients, 12 died and one was lost during follow-up. For the total of 111 patients finally included, the median age was 56 years and 25.2% were females. The overall baseline median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3. AF was found in 13 (11.71%) patients. Patients who were finally diagnosed with AF had a significantly higher number of PACs/h and a longer median LSVR duration at baseline (16.67 vs. 0.21, p < 0.001 and 3 vs. 0 s, p < 0.001, respectively). The presence of ESVEA was also significantly more frequent among AF patients (46.15%, 95%CI: 17.78%-74.22%) compared to non-AF ones (6.1%, 95%CI: 1.3%-10.7%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Excessive atrial ectopy, detected with 24 h inpatient Holter monitoring, is a significant indicator of future development of AF in patients presenting originally with a cryptogenic stroke.

Left Distal Radial Artery Access for Coronary Angiography and Interventions: A 12-Month All-Comers Study.

BACKGROUND: Interventional cardiologists prefer the right radial artery (RA) approach for coronary angiography and interventions, mainly for ergonomic reasons. However, the use of the left RA presents certain advantages, and the snuffbox approach has further potential advantages, including lower probability for RA occlusion, avoidance of direct puncture of the RA (thus maintaining its suitability for use as a graft), as well as easier and faster hemostasis. METHODS: Consecutive patients scheduled for coronary catheterization were included, using the left distal RA (ldRA) in the anatomical snuffbox as the default vascular access site. RESULTS: Out of 2034 consecutive cases, the ldRA was used as initial vascular access in 1977 patients (97.2%). The procedural failure rate was 9.9% (21.9% inability to puncture the artery, 75.0% inability to advance the wire, 3.1% other reasons). There was a sharp decrease in failure rate after about the first 200 cases (20.8% in the first decile vs 8.7% throughout the rest of the caseload; P<.001). No or very weak palpable pulse was the most important predictor of failure (odds ratio, 16.0; 95% confidence interval, 11.2-23.1; P<.001), in addition to older age, small stature, and female gender (although, after adjustment for height, the latter was no longer significant). CONCLUSION: In a large series of consecutive patients scheduled for left heart catheterization, through a period of 12 months, with virtually no exclusions except those few imposed by anatomy or compelling clinical needs, the ldRA arterial access approach was shown to be highly effective, feasible, and safe.

Different venous approaches for implantation of cardiac electronic devices. A network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Many of the complications arising from cardiac device implantation are associated to the venous access used for lead placement. Previous analyses reported that cephalic vein cutdown (CVC) is safer but less effective than subclavian vein puncture (SVP). However, comparisons between these techniques and axillary vein puncture (AVP) - guided either by ultrasound or fluoroscopy - are lacking. Thus, we aimed to compare safety and efficacy of these approaches. METHODS: We searched for articles assessing at least two different approaches regarding the incidence of pneumothorax and/or lead failure (LF). When available, bleeding and infectious complications as well as procedural success were analyzed. A frequentist random effects network meta-analysis model was adopted. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were analyzed. Most articles assessed SVP versus CVC. Compared to SVP, both CVC and AVP were associated with reduced odds of pneumothorax (OR: 0.193, 95%CI: 0.136-0.275 and OR: 0.128, 95%CI: 0.050-0.329; respectively) and LF (OR: 0.63, 95%CI: 0.406-0.976 and OR: 0.425, 95%CI: 0.286-0.632; respectively). No significant differences between AVP and CVC were demonstrated. Limited data suggests no major impact of different approaches on infectious and bleeding complications. Initial CVC approach required significantly more often an alternate/additional venous access for lead placement, compared to both AVP and SVP. No differences between these two were identified. CONCLUSION: Both AVP and CVC seem to decrease incident pneumothorax and LF, compared to SVP. Initial AVP approach seems to decrease the need of alternate venous access, compared to CVC. These results suggest that AVP should be further clinically tested.