Evaluation of VIIth-XIIth cranial nerve anastomosis results by age.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate VIIth-XIIth cranial nerve (hypoglossal-facial nerve) anastomosis results by age. METHOD: A total of 34 patients who attended a follow-up visit in 2016, aged 20-63 years, were enrolled. The House-Brackmann facial nerve function grading system and the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation scale were applied. RESULTS: Regarding post-anastomosis facial nerve function, in the group aged 40 years or less, 14 patients (78 per cent) had House-Brackmann grade III and 4 patients (22 per cent) had House-Brackmann grade IV facial nerve function post-anastomosis. In the group aged over 40 years, nine patients (56 per cent) had House-Brackmann grade III and seven patients (44 per cent) had House-Brackmann grade IV facial nerve function post-anastomosis. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in mean facial movement domain scores (p = 0.02). Analysis between age and facial movement score in all 34 patients demonstrated a moderate negative correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient: -0.38) and statistical significance (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Facial reanimation yielded better results in younger than in older patients.

Maxillomandibular advancement for obstructive sleep apnea.

Objective: : We aimed to present our clinical experience with maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) syndrome and to compare our results with literature data. Materials and Methods: : The patients who were operated for OSA in the last 10 years were included in the study. A detailed patient's charts review was retrospectively performed. Inclusion criteria were to be available with preoperative and postoperative polysomnography data. Results: : There were totally 7 cases who underwent MMA procedure for OSA in our clinic. The mean age was 38.6 ± 8.1 years. Surgical success was achieved in all cases (100%). The mean preoperative and postoperative apnea-hypopnea indexes were 63.3 ± 35.2 and 7.5 ± 3.4, respectively (P < 0.05). The most common complication was inferior alveolar nerve deficit following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. The facial numbness was temporary in 4 (57.1%), and permanent in one case (14.3%). Conclusion: Our surgical results in MMA is compatible with literature data. MMA is the choice of treatment in severe OSA in case of positive airway pressure therapy intolerance.

Diagnostic role of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in oral cavity cancers.

AIM: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic role of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and other hemogram parameters in differentiating nonmalignant oral cavity lesions from oral cavity cancers. METHODS: Ninety-five patients who were performed oral cavity biopsy between the years 2013 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The control group comprised consecutive 70 patients who underwent septoplasty/septorhinoplasty procedures. Inclusion criteria were to be available with common blood count (CBC) just prior to procedure. The hemogram parameters including NLR were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Lymphocyte count and mean platelet volume (MPV) were found to be significantly decreased in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and in other oral cavity cancers (OCCs) compared with benign oral cavity lesions and control group. In contrast, NLR revealed significantly higher in OCCs and in oral SCC compared with nonmalignant oral cavity lesions and control group. The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis suggested cutoff value of 2.88 for NLR in predicting malignancy [area under curve (AUC) 0.756, sensitivity 51%, specificity 88%]. CONCLUSIONS: NLR was first shown to be significantly elevated in oral cavity cancers and in oral cavity SCC in this study. In our opinion, NLR may be helpful in identifying the oral cavity lesions at high risk for harboring malignancy.

Comparison of Carina active middle-ear implant with conventional hearing aids for mixed hearing loss.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the auditory outcomes of Carina middle-ear implants with those of conventional hearing aids in patients with moderate-to-severe mixed hearing loss. METHODS: The study comprised nine patients (six males, three females) who underwent middle-ear implantation with Carina fully implantable active middle-ear implants to treat bilateral moderate-to-severe mixed hearing loss. The patients initially used conventional hearing aids and subsequently received the Carina implants. The hearing thresholds with implants and hearing aids were compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between: the pre-operative and post-operative air and bone conduction thresholds (p > 0.05), the thresholds with hearing aids and Carina implants (p > 0.05), or the pre-operative (mean, 72.8 ± 19 per cent) and post-operative (mean, 69.9 ± 24 per cent) speech discrimination scores (p > 0.05). One of the patients suffered total sensorineural hearing loss three months following implantation despite an initial 38 dB functional gain. All except one patient showed clinical improvements after implantation according to quality of life questionnaire (Glasgow Benefit Inventory) scores. CONCLUSION: Acceptance of Carina implants is better than with conventional hearing aids in patients with mixed hearing loss, although both yield similar hearing amplification. Cosmetic reasons appear to be critical for patient acceptance.