[Exocrine meets neuroendocrine: mimickers of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms]. / Exokrin trifft neuroendokrin: Mimickers neuroendokriner Neoplasien des Pankreas.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) originate from various epithelial or neuroectodermal tissues, can occur in any organ, including the pancreas, and are characterized by the expression of the neuroendocrine markers synaptophysin and chromogranin A. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are well-differentiated epithelial neoplasms with morphological and immunohistochemical features of neuroendocrine differentiation of low, intermediate, or high grade. Pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (PanNECs) are clinically aggressive, high-grade (poorly differentiated) carcinomas with morphologic features suggesting neuroendocrine differentiation, a high proliferative rate (> 20 mitoses per 2 mm2 and Ki67 index > 20%), and immunohistochemical labeling for neuroendocrine markers. They include the small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and the large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma categories.Neuroendocrine-like morphology coupled with immunohistochemical markers of neuroendocrine differentiation are highly specific. However, neuroendocrine markers may also be expressed in non-neuroendocrine neoplasms, which can therefore be confused with NENs. Mimickers of pancreatic NENs comprise a number of important pitfall tumors, including epithelial and non-epithelial neoplasms, such as acinar cell carcinomas, solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs), or even non-neoplastic lesions. All of these lesions have the expression of neuroendocrine markers in common, such as synaptophysin and chromogranin A, and although they are comparatively rare, they can cause considerable diagnostic problems. This review article deals with some of the most important mimickers of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and even non-neoplastic lesions, such as islet aggregation. The similarities and differences between these entities and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are highlighted, and key findings that facilitate the correct diagnosis are discussed.

Phenotyping of tumor-associated macrophages in colorectal cancer: Impact on single cell invasion (tumor budding) and clinicopathological outcome.

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) play a controversial role in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). In particular, the microlocalization, polarization and prognostic impact of TAM in the immediate environment of invading CRC cells has not yet been established. To address this clinically relevant question, intraepithelial (iCD68) and stromal macrophages (sCD68), M1-macrophages (iNOS), M2-macrophages (CD163), cytokeratin-positive cancer cells (tumor buds) and expression of the anti-phagocytic marker CD47 were investigated in primary tumors of 205 well-characterized CRC patients. Cell-to-cell contacts between tumor buds and TAM were detected using high-resolution digital scans. The composition of the tumor microenvironment was analyzed with clinicopathological and molecular features. High CD68 counts predicted long term overall survival independent of microlocalization (iCD68 p=0.0016; sCD68 p=0.03), pT, pN, pM and post-operative therapy. CD68 infiltration correlated with significantly less tumor budding (iCD68 p=0.0066; sCD68 p=0.0091) and absence of lymph node metastasis (sCD68 p=0.0286). Cell-to-cell contact of sCD68 and invading cancer cells was frequent and ameliorated the detrimental prognostic effect of the tumor budding phenotype. Subgroup analysis identified long-term survival with CD47 loss and predominance of CD163+ M2 macrophages (p = 0.0366). CD163+ macrophages represented 40% of the total population, and positively correlated with total CD68 macrophage numbers (r[CD68/CD163] = 0.32; p = 0.0001). Strong CD163 infiltration predicted lower tumor grade (p = 0.0026) and less lymph node metastasis (p = 0.0056). This study provides direct morphological evidence of an interaction between TAM and infiltrating cancer cells. The prognostic impact of TAM is modulated by phenotype, microlocalization and the expression of anti-phagocytic markers in CRC.

HOX D13 expression across 79 tumor tissue types.

HOX genes control normal development, primary cellular processes and are characterized by a unique genomic network organization. Locus D HOX genes play an important role in limb generation and mesenchymal condensation. Dysregulated HOXD13 expression has been detected in breast cancer, melanoma, cervical cancer and astrocytomas. We have investigated the epidemiology of HOXD13 expression in human tissues and its potential deregulation in the carcinogenesis of specific tumors. HOXD13 homeoprotein expression has been detected using microarray technology comprising more than 4,000 normal and neoplastic tissue samples including 79 different tumor categories. Validation of HOXD13 expression has been performed, at mRNA level, for selected tumor types. Significant differences are detectable between specific normal tissues and corresponding tumor types with the majority of cancers showing an increase in HOXD13 expression (16.1% normal vs. 57.7% cancers). In contrast, pancreas and stomach tumor subtypes display the opposite trend. Interestingly, detection of the HOXD13 homeoprotein in pancreas-tissue microarrays shows that its negative expression has a significant and adverse effect on the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer independent of the T or N stage at the time of diagnosis. Our study provides, for the first time, an overview of a HOX protein expression in a large series of normal and neoplastic tissue types, identifies pancreatic cancer as one of the most affected by the HOXD13 hoemoprotein and underlines the way homeoproteins can be associated to human cancerogenesis.

Chromosomal instability in gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas: a fluorescent in situ hybridization study using a tissue microarray approach.

Extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphomas (mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue [MALT] lymphomas) of the gastrointestinal tract have been known to have characteristic chromosomal aberrations including trisomies of chromosomes 3, 12, and 18. However, knowledge of the clinical significance of cytogenetic changes in MALT lymphomas is still limited. In the present study, the frequency of the numeric and structural aberrations of the chromosomes 1, 3, 12, 18 and X and of the MALT1 gene as well as their potential clinical significance were analyzed by using fluorescent in situ hybridization on a tissue microarray containing 257 tissue samples from 203 cases of surgically resected primary gastric lymphomas including 115 cases of MALT lymphomas, 88 cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs, 75 with an associated MALT lymphoma, so-called ex-MALT DLBCL, and 13 de novo), and 54 controls cases of Helicobacter pylori-associated chronic gastritis. Clinical follow-up information was available in 137 cases. Trisomies 1, 3, 12, and 18 were detected in 3.3%, 44.4%, 12.3%, and 19.2% of MALT lymphomas and in 11.1%, 42.2%, 26.5%, and 22.0% of ex-MALT DLBCLs, respectively. In addition, we found gains of the X chromosome in 36.4% of MALT lymphomas, in 34.5% of ex-MALT DLBCLs, and in 36.4% of de novo DLBCLs. Structural and/or numeric abnormalities of the MALT1 gene were observed in 37.0% of MALT lymphomas and in 22.2% of ex-MALT DLBCLs. In de novo DLBCL, trisomies for chromosomes 3, 12, 18, and X were found in 42.9%, 10.0%, 11.1%, and 36.4%, respectively, whereas alterations of MALT1 (namely, translocations) were found in 20.0% of the cases. An unexpected high and previously unreported gain of chromosome X in gastric MALT lymphomas was found. This tumor appears, therefore, to be a genetically unstable neoplasia. Our results point out that t(11;18) and aneuploidy may be both involved in lymphomagenesis and that at least a subset of MALT lymphomas may progress toward high-grade neoplasia.