Effects of dietary interventions on 24-hour urine parameters in patients with idiopathic recurrent calcium oxalate stones.

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of dietary factors on 24-hour urine parameters in patients with idiopathic recurrent calcium oxalate stones. A total of 108 of idiopathic recurrent calcium oxalate stones were included in the study. A 24-hour urinalysis was performed and metabolic abnormalities were measured for all of the patients. All of the patients were given specialized diets for their 24-hour urine abnormalities. At the end of first month, the same parameters were examined in another 24-hour urinalysis. Hyperoxaluria, hypernatruria, and hypercalciuria were found in 84 (77%), 43 (39.8%), and 38 (35.5%) of the patients, respectively. The differences between the oxalate, sodium, volume, uric acid, and citrate parameters before and after the dietary intervention were significant (p < 0.05). The calcium parameters were not significantly different before and after the intervention. We found that oxalate, sodium, volume, uric acid, and citrate-but not calcium-abnormalities in patients with recurrent calcium oxalate stones can be corrected by diet. The metabolic profiles of idiopathic calcium oxalate stone patients should be evaluated and the appropriate dietary interventions should be implemented to decrease stone recurrence.

Safety of ESWL in elderly: evaluation of independent predictors and comorbidity on stone-free rate and complications.

AIM: Urinary stone disease affects people of all ages. With its satisfactory efficacy ranges in all age groups and lack of side-effects, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has become the preferred treatment modality for uncomplicated renal and proximal calculi ≤ 20 mm. In the present study, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the ESWL treatment in elderly patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out on patients aged over 65 years who underwent shock wave lithotripsy at our Department from 2009 to 2011, with a Siemens Lithostar electromagnetic shockwave lithotripter. A total of 231 patients (157 males, 74 females) out of 1694 (13.6%) were studied. The patients were divided into two groups (group 1 = 65-70; group 2 >70). The effect of age and other possible predicting factors (sex, stone localization and stone size) were investigated. Concomitant diseases and related complications were also evaluated. RESULTS: An overall stone-free rate (SFR) of 82.2% was found. The influence of sex on SFR was non-significant. There was no significant difference when comparing SFR between the age groups. When patients were divided into those with renal and ureteral stones, the SFR were 94.4% and 67.6% (P < 0.01), respectively. The SFR of the stone size groups, ≤ 10 mm and > 10 mm were 80% and 84.4%, respectively. Comorbidity was present in 148 patients. Complications were noted in 56 of 231 patients. Of 56 patients, 43 had minor complications and 13 major complications. CONCLUSION: ESWL seems to be an effective first-line treatment choice for urinary stones in elderly patients with careful patient selection and personalized preparation.

Significance of lower-pole pelvicaliceal anatomy on stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy in nonobstructive isolated renal pelvic stones.

PURPOSE: To investigate the probable effect of lower-pole pelvicaliceal anatomy on stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in patients with nonobstructive renal pelvic stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinical records of patients with isolated renal pelvic stones who underwent SWL between 1996 and 2005 were reviewed. After excluding patients with obstruction leading to dilatation, major anatomic abnormalities, noncalcium stones, metabolic abnormalities, history of recurrent stone disease, multiple stones, and previous renal surgery, 153 patients were enrolled in the study. Lower pole infundibulopelvic angle (IPA) and infundibular length and width were measured from intravenous urography. Patients were classified into three groups according to stone burden (group 1, <100 mm(2); group 2, 101-200 mm(2); group 3, 201-400 mm(2)). RESULTS: The mean stone size was 142.08+/-86.3 mm(2). Overall stone-free rate was 53.6%. Localization of clinically significant or insignificant residual fragments was in the lower calix, renal pelvis, and both in 50 (32.6%), 29 (18.9%), and 8 (5.2%) patients, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in pelvicaliceal anatomic features except narrower IPA (P=0.02) in group 1 patients with residual stones. CONCLUSION: The falling of stone fragments to the lower calix in spite of the ureter whether clinically significant or not after SWL of pelvic stones initially seems to be related to stone burden rather than lower caliceal anatomy. However, existence of a more narrow IPA in group 1 patients with residual fragments led us to believe that lower-pole IPA can play a role in stone clearance, especially for smaller stones, probably because of smaller residual fragment size or the more mobile nature of the primary stone.

The impact of pelvicaliceal features on problematic lower pole stone clearance in different age groups.

AIM: Our aim was to evaluate the impact of pelvicaliceal variables in pediatric and adult age groups who underwent SWL for lower caliceal calculi. METHODS: 25 pediatric and 78 adult patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) between 1996 and 2004 were enrolled into the study after exclusion of patients with hydronephrosis, major renal anatomic anomalies, non-calcium stones, history of recurrent stone disease and previous renal surgery. Lower pole infundibulopelvic angle (IPA), infundibular length (IL), infundibular width (IW) and pelvicaliceal volume were measured from pre-SWL intravenous urography. The pelvicaliceal stone load (PSL) index implicating the stone burden of each patient described as the relationship between stone volume and total estimated pelvicaliceal volume for stone-bearing kidney was also calculated. RESULTS: Sixty-eight percent of adult and 80% of pediatric patients became stone-free after SWL. The statistical insignificance between PSL index (p=0.097) of two groups shows that both groups shared a similar stone burden. According to SWL outcome, mean IPA values of stone-free and residual patients were 46.85 degrees and 30 degrees in pediatric group, respectively (p=0.01), whereas these values were 48.08 degrees and 43.06 degrees in the adult group, respectively (p=0.352). In the pediatric age group, stone-free and cumulative success rates increased with increasing IPA but this correlation was statistically insignificant (p: 0.263). CONCLUSIONS: Lower caliceal anatomy has a higher impact on stone clearance after SWL in pediatric patients and urologists can expect better SWL outcomes from pediatric population with solitary lower caliceal stone than adults under the same conditions.

The impact of radiological anatomy in clearance of lower caliceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy.

The goal of this study was to determine the factors affecting stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for lower caliceal stones. Lower pole stone clearance was investigated in 128 (80 males, 48 females) patients treated with ESWL during 1998-2003 in our clinic. Renal anatomy was determined on standard intravenous urogram. The lower infundibulopelvic angle (LIPA) was measured as the angle between the vertical pelvis axis and the vertical axis of lower infundibulum (Sampaio's method). The mean age of the patients was 42.8 +/- 12.4 (19-77) years. The mean stone diameter and burden were found to be 1.28 +/- 0.58 (0.5-3.5) cm and 1.2 +/- 1 (0-7) cm(2) respectively. The stone-free rate was 62.5% and ESWL was unsuccessful in 16 (12.5%) patients. Thirty-two (25%) patients had residual fragments < or =4 mm retained in lower calices after lithotripsy. The stone clearance was found to be unrelated to stone burden and diameter (P = 0.17 and P = 0.14, respectively). However, there was a significant difference between mean lower pole infundibulum length (P = 0.001), infundibulum width (P = 0.001) and LIPA (P = 0.0001) between stone-free patients and patients with residual fragments. Multivariate logistic regression analysis accepting stone-free as the favourable result also confirmed that LIPA, lower pole infundibulum length and width were factors that significantly affected the outcome. Lower pole anatomy has a significant influence on clearance of fragments after ESWL.

Pneumatic lithotripsy for large ureteral stones: is it the first line treatment?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) with ureteroscopy in the treatment of large ureteral stones. METHODS: We reviewed, retrospectively, the records of 156 patients (122 male, 34 female) who had ureteral calculi larger than 10 mm that were treated with PL. Of these patients, 41 (26.3%) were treated primarily with PL and 115 (73.7%) were treated secondarily after unsuccessful extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). The mean stone diameter was 12.87 mm (range 10-20.5 mm). Results were evaluated 3 months after treatment by excretory urography and/or ultrasonography. RESULTS: The overall stone-free and fragmentation rates (FRs) were 85.2 and 92.3%, respectively. Corresponding values were 60 and 84% for upper ureteral stones, 79.5 and 89.7% for middle ureter stones and 94.5 and 95.6% for lower ureteral stones, respectively. The main complications were migration of a complete stone or of fragments (7.1%), urosepsis (4.5%) and ureteral perforation (1.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Although SWL is generally accepted as the first treatment option for ureteral stones because of its non-invasive nature, PL with ureteroscopy seems to be a good alternative with the advantage of higher success rates and quick stone clearance. Especially when we take the importance of quick stone removal into account for larger ureteral stones, which are more likely to have obstruction, impaction, or infection, we believe that PL may be chosen as the first line treatment rather than SWL for stones larger than 10 mm.

Is stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy in patients with solitary upper-caliceal stone influenced by anatomic differences in the pelvicaliceal system?

PURPOSE: We investigated the effect of pelvicaliceal differences on stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in patients with solitary upper-caliceal stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The clinical records of patients with solitary upper-caliceal stones who underwent SWL between 1996 and 2004 were reviewed. After excluding patients with hydronephrosis, significant anatomic abnormalities, non-calcium stones, metabolic abnormalities, recurrent stone disease, multiple stones, and previous renal surgery, 42 patients with a mean stone size of 153.47 mm2 (range 20-896 mm2) were enrolled in this study. They were divided into three groups according to stone burden (group 1 < or =100 mm2, group 2,101 mm2-200 mm2, and group 3 >200 mm2). Upper-pole infundibulopelvic angle (IPA), infundibular length (IL), and infundibular width (IW) were measured from intravenous urograms. RESULTS: Of the total, 29 patients (69%) were stone free after SWL treatment. The differences in the upperpole IPA, IL, and IW of stone-free patients and patients with residual stones were not statistically significant (P = 0.85, P = 0.89, and P = 0.37, respectively). Again, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of upper IPA, IW, and IL in comparing the three groups divided by initial stone size. CONCLUSION: Upper-caliceal anatomy does not exert a significant impact on stone clearance after SWL for isolated upper-caliceal stones. To best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the effects of pelvicaliceal anatomy on SWL treatment for upper-caliceal stones, so there is a need for further investigations to confirm our findings.

Minimally invasive treatment of ureteral calculi in children.

A retrospective analysis was done to determine the efficacy of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy in the treatment of paediatric ureteral calculi. We reviewed the records of 67 (35 boys, 32 girls) children (71 ureters) admitted to our clinic for treatment of ureteral calculi during 1990-2005. The initial treatment method was SWL in 80.3% (57 ureters), ureteroscopy in 11.3% (eight ureters) and open surgery in 8.5% (six ureters) of the renal units. The mean age of the patients was 10.67 +/- 4.4(1-16) years. The stone-free rates after SWL for upper, middle and lower ureteral calculi were 74.1, 100 and 75.9%, respectively. Increased stone diameter (P = 0.014) and/or burden (P = 0.002) were found to be significant factors that had an adverse affect on the stone-free rate after SWL while the success rates of SWL were independent of location. Including six patients (seven ureters) with failed SWL, a total of 14 patients (15 renal units) subjected to ureteroscopy for lower ureteral calculi yielded a stone-free rate of 93.3%. Thus, the overall stone-free rates after SWL, ureteroscopy and open surgery were found to be 75.4, 93.3 and 100%, respectively. Depending on the stone burden, SWL might be a good option for initial treatment of most ureteral calculi in children. Ureteroscopy offers a high success rate for lower ureteral calculi, including SWL failures.

Factors affecting the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi in children.

The aim of the study was to analyse factors affecting the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in children with renal calculi. We performed a retrospective analysis reviewing records of 85 (40 female, 45 male) children (89 renal units) subjected to ESWL for treatment of renal calculi during 1990-2005 in our department. As 4 patients had bilateral calculi and 19 children (21 renal units) had renal stones at more than one different site, each location was analysed separately for convenience. The mean age of the patients was 10.3+/-4.6 (2-16) years. The stone-free rates for renal pelvis, lower, middle and upper caliceal calculi were 70, 62, 50 and 73%, respectively. A higher rate (33%) of insignificant fragments (< or = 4 mm) was noted for lower pole calculi. Increased stone diameter (P=0.0001) and burden (P=0.04) were found as the most significant factors that adversely affect the stone-free rate for pelvis renalis calculi, whereas an acutely oriented infundibulum and/or a long lower infundibulum (P=0.005) were unfavourable factors for clearance of lower caliceal stones. The stone-free rate in children with multiple calculi was 48%, while 29% of the renal units had retained fragments. ESWL is a good initial option for treatment of most of the renal calculi < 2 cm except in the presence of unfavourable lower caliceal anatomy. Increased stone burden, multiple stones, staghorn calculi, narrow lower infundibulopelvic angle and long lower infundibulum are factors that adversely affect the clearance rate.

Value of ultrasonography and helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of stone-free patients after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (USG and helical CT after SWL).

AIM: To define the value of different radiologic modalities in determining the patients who believed to be stone-free after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) with plain abdominal X-ray, by evaluating the same patients with ultrasonography (USG) and helical computed tomography (CT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 2002 and February 2003, 76 patients with urolithiazis who were treated with SWL and considered to be stone-free with plain abdominal X-ray, were evaluated with USG and helical CT. The results were compared for the accuracy of the stone-free diagnosis. RESULTS: Residual stones were detected in 9 (11.8%) with USG and in 17 (22.3%) with CT of 76 patients who were thought to be stone-free with plain abdominal X-ray alone. CONCLUSIONS: Although plain abdominal X-ray has been accepted as the first line diagnostic tool in the follow-up after SWL with its cheap and practical use, helical CT was found to be more valuable in diagnosis of residual stone fragments which has not been found in plain abdominal X-ray. If we take these considerations which can change our clinical approach and patient follow-up into account, we believe that the routine use of helical CT can give more accurate information in patient controls after SWL.

Does tamsulosin enhance lower ureteral stone clearance with or without shock wave lithotripsy?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether alpha1-blockers have any impact on stone clearance in patients with lower ureteral stones who underwent either shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) or were followed up with standard hydration, analgesics, and anti-inflammatory treatment. METHODS: A total of 78 patients (56 men and 22 women) who had lower ureteral stones located at the distal 5 cm of the ureter were divided into four groups. The first group consisted of 30 patients (38.5%) with stones less than 5 mm (range 3 to 5) who were randomly divided into two subgroups. Group 1 consisted of 15 patients (19.2%) who were followed up with oral hydration and diclofenac sodium. Group 2 consisted of 15 patients (19.2%) who received tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily in addition to the standard regimens. The second two groups consisted of 48 patients (61.5%) with stones greater than 5 mm (range 6 to 15) who underwent SWL. These patients were also randomly divided between those who did not (group 3, n = 24) and those who did (group 4, n = 24) receive tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily. All patients were re-evaluated with plain abdominal x-rays and helical computed tomography 15 days after the beginning of treatment. RESULTS: Of the 78 patients, 36 (46.2%) became stone free. The stone-free rate was 20%, 53.3%, 33.3%, and 70.8% for group 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The best results were achieved in those who underwent SWL plus tamsulosin treatment (group 4). The differences between the stone-free rates for groups 3 versus 4 (P = 0.019) and the tamsulosin versus control groups (P = 0.0015) were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of tamsulosin to conventional treatment seemed beneficial in terms of stone clearance of lower ureteral stones, and this effect was more evident for larger stones, especially when combined with SWL.

Stones in anomalous kidneys: results of treatment by shock wave lithotripsy in 150 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in anomalous kidneys. METHODS: From October 1990 to October 2002, 150 patients (93 men and 57 women) with anomalous urinary tracts, including 45 horseshoe kidneys, 57 duplex kidneys, 30 malrotated kidneys, 14 pelvic and four crossed ectopic kidneys were treated with SWL for urolithiasis at the Gazi University Faculty of Medicine. Shock wave lithotripsy was performed with Siemens Lithostar plus (Siemans, Erlanger, Germany) device and all procedures were carried under fluoroscopic control. RESULTS: The mean shock wave number and intensity received by the patients was 3770 (range, 1380-4100) shocks and 18.4 (range, 16.1-19) kV per session, respectively. The minimum success rate was obtained in patients with lower calyceal (50%) followed by middle calyceal (60%) calculi. The stone-free rate decreased and the number of sessions per patient increased with increasing stone diameter (dm). In patients with a stone dm > 30 mm, only 34% could be stone-free, compared to a rate of 92% for calculi dm < 10 mm. The overall stone free rate at the third month was 68%. The best stone-free rates were obtained in patients with ureteral duplication (80.7%). The stone-free rates in horseshoe, malrotated, pelvic and crossed ectopic kidneys were found to be 66.7%, 56.7%, 57.2% and 25%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Shock wave lithotripsy might be an effective and minimally invasive treatment alternative in stone-bearing anomalous kidneys. The type of anomaly, stone burden and localization seem to be the main parameters effecting the treatment success.

Management of ureteral stones with pneumatic lithotripsy: report of 500 patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) with ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed, retrospectively, the records of 500 patients (366 male, 134 female) with ureteral calculi treated by PL with the Swiss Lithoclast. Of these patients, 124 (24.8%) were treated primarily and 376 (75.2%) were treated secondarily after unsuccessful extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). The results were evaluated 3 months after treatment by excretory urography, ultrasonography, or both. RESULTS: The over-all stone-free and fragmentation rates were 94.6% and 96.8%, respectively. These values were 97.1% and 98.5% for stones 10 mm, respectively. The main complications were stone migration (2.0%), urosepsis (3.0%), and ureteral perforation (1.4%). CONCLUSIONS: While SWL is generally excepted as a first-line treatment option in ureteral stones because of its noninvasive nature, in situ lithotripsy, and especially PL, has higher success rates with minimal morbidity. Thus, PL seems to be a good alternative in patients in whom SWL was unsuccessful or not indicated and in patients who need early stone removal.

Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for treatment of ureteral calculi in paediatric patients.

Our objective was to determine the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of paediatric ureteral calculous disease. We reviewed the records of 41 (23 boys, 18 girls) paediatric patients admitted to our clinic for the treatment of ureteral calculi between between 1989-2001. Patients' age varied between 4-16 years. The majority of the patients, 38 (92.7%) cases were treated initially with ESWL whereas 3 (7.3%) cases were subjected to ureterolithotomy. The mean age of the patients was found as 12.8+/-3.86 (4-16) years. Most calculi were located at either upper or lower ureter. The mean stone burden was 45.16+/-30.65 mm2 and the mean shock wave number per session and power as 2826.72+/-605.18 and 17.69+/-1.11 kV respectively. Minor complications included skin ecchymosis at the site of entry of shock waves in all cases and renal colic that responded to analgesics and emetics in 3 (7.9%) patients. The overall stone-free rate after ESWL was found to be 81.6%. Two (5.3%) cases have residual fragments that escaped to lower calices after lithotripsy for upper ureteral calculi and are still followed. There were 5 (13.2%) failures who were treated with ureterolitotomy for 1 upper and 1 lower ureteral calculi and with ureteroscopy for the rest. It appears that ESWL is still a good option for the initial treatment of most ureteral calculi in children as it is less invasive than ureteroscopy and has a high success rate as a first-line therapy.

The impact of radiological anatomy in clearance of lower calyceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy in paediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors affecting stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in children with lower calyceal stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lower pole stone clearance was reviewed in 34 patients aged between 2 and 16 years (23 boys and 11 girls) treated with ESWL between 1989 and 2001 in our clinic. Renal anatomy was determined on standard intravenous urograms. The lower infundibulopelvic angle (IPA) was measured by two different methods based either on measuring the angle between vertical pelvis axis and vertical axis of lower infundibulum or finding the angle between the ureteropelvic axis and vertical axis of lower infundibulum. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 12.1+/-4.16 (2-16) years. The mean stone burden was found as 96.93+/-87.13 mm(2) and the mean shock wave number per session and power as 2631.4+/-593.1 and 17.57+/-1.1 kV, respectively. The stone-free rate was 55.9%. Fifteen (44.1%) cases had residual fragments retained in lower calices after lithotripsy and are still followed. The stone clearance was found to be unrelated to stone burden and infundibulum width (p=0.44 and p=0.34, respectively). However, a significant difference was present between mean lower pole infundibular length (p=0.0032) and lower IPA measurements according to both methods between stone-free cases and others. The most remarkable factor that had a significant influence on stone clearance was an acutely oriented infundibulum defined according to IPA-ureteropelvic axis angle determination method (p=0.00001) followed by Sampaio's pelvic axis method (p=0.0001). Only 1 (5%) patient was stone-free under 40 degrees and 1 (6%) case with an angle of 45 degrees had residual fragments in the former method. Similarly none of the cases had residual fragments over 90 degrees for Sampaio's method and 90% of the stone-free cases had a more obtuse angle. Thus, we determined that a cut-off point of 40 degrees for the IPA-ureteropelvic axis method and 90 degrees for Sampaio's method was most useful to determine the clearance of lower pole fragments. CONCLUSION: The factors affecting stone clearance in paediatric patients are similar to adults.

An unusual cause of urinothorax.

Urinothorax is a rare complication of blunt renal trauma, ureteral instrumentation or ureteral surgery. A leakage from the urinary tract causes urinoma, a retroperitoneal collection of fluid, which can lead to urinothorax. We report a patient with solitary kidney who underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for nephrolithiasis. Four days after ESWL, she had right-sided pleural effusion which demonstrated as urinothorax. Urinoma occurring after ESWL, as in our case, is a situation that has not been reported before as a cause of urinothorax. Urinothorax should be taken into consideration in patients with pleural effusion who recently underwent ESWL.