Comparison of the bronchodilating effects of inhaled ß2-agonists after methacholine challenge in a human lung reperfusion model.

The aim of the present investigation was to compare the onset of action and intrinsic activity of the long-acting ß(2)-agonist GW597901 with the fast- and short-acting salbutamol as model compounds using an isolated human lung reperfusion model. Twelve resected human lung lobes were challenged with methacholine (MCh) and subsequently nebulised with either GW597901 or salbutamol. Prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) concentrations in the perfusion fluid were compared with the dose of MCh that was required to induce a bronchoconstriction. After successful MCh provocation, nebulisation of GW597901 and salbutamol fully reversed any observed bronchoconstriction. The bronchodilating effect was more pronounced for GW597901. Salbutamol revealed an immediate onset of action while the effect of GW597901 was observed with an approximate delay of 6 min. Higher doses of MCh were required for a successful bronchial challenge in the presence of elevated PGE(2) levels (r=0.8171, p ≤ 0.05). For the first time, an isolated perfused human lung model has been established for comparing the onset of action and potency of a short- and long-acting ß(2)-agonist. We therefore conclude that it is an alternative for determination of drug effect characteristics and suitable for supplementing or predicting clinical data.

Surfactant protein A (SP-A) and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) as early biomarkers for pulmonary edema formation in ventilated human lung lobes.

OBJECTIVE: Ex vivo perfused and ventilated lung lobes frequently develop pulmonary edema. We were looking for a suitable and early detectable biomarker in the perfusion fluid indicating lung cell damage and loss of tissue integrity in ventilated human lung lobes. Therefore, we elucidated whether surfactant protein A (SP-A) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) were measurable in the perfusion fluid and whether they were suitable indicators for edema formation occurring within the experimental time frame of 1-2 h. METHODS: Patients (n = 39) undergoing a lobectomy, bilobectomy or pneumonectomy due to primary bronchial cell carcinoma were included in the studies. Lung lobes were extracorporally ventilated and perfused for up to 2 h. Two different perfusion fluids were used, plain perfusion buffer and perfusion buffer containing packed erythrocytes or buffy coats. Perfusion fluid samples were analyzed for SP-A and ACE using immunoassays served as perfusion fluids. RESULTS: SP-A and ACE concentrations were analyzed in fluid sample sets of 39 and 33 perfusion experiments, respectively. Degrees of edema formation were arbitrarily classified into three groups (≤ 29, 30-59, ≥ 60 % weight gain). The maximum increase of SP-A and ACE concentrations in the perfusate was significantly higher for more pronounced edemas in case of perfusions using a mixture of blood components and buffer. Interestingly, the time courses of ACE and SP-A were highly similar. CONCLUSION: We suggest that SP-A and ACE are promising early biochemical markers for the development for pulmonary edema formation in the ex vivo lung lobe perfusion.

Methacholine delays pulmonary absorption of inhaled ß(2)-agonists due to competition for organic cation/carnitine transporters.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present investigation was to compare the pulmonary absorption of the novel long-acting ß(2)-agonist GW597901 with salbutamol and to determine the influence of an induced bronchoconstriction on the pharmacokinetics of the compounds using a human lung reperfusion model. METHODS: In an initial study with six lung perfusions the pharmacokinetic properties of the ß(2)-agonists were determined. We then investigated the influence of an induced bronchoconstriction on the pulmonary absorption in six lung lobes for each drug. Therefore, methacholine (MCh) challenge agent was nebulised prior to administration of the ß(2)-agonists. RESULTS: As expected, the extent of pulmonary absorption of salbutamol into the perfusate was more pronounced than for the more lipophilic GW597901. Although the observed differences were not statistically significant they were further supported by analysis of tissue concentrations. In contrast, we observed a statistically significant influence of the bronchoprovocation with MCh on the pulmonary absorption of both ß(2)-agonists, but this effect was not limited to a successfully induced bronchoconstriction. A prominent decline of salbutamol distribution into perfusion fluid was also observed when the organic cation transporter substrate carnitine was nebulised prior to the bronchodilator. CONCLUSIONS: Nebulised methacholine had a significant influence on the pharmacokinetics of bronchodilators. Since we observed this effect independently of a successfully induced bronchoconstriction and also after nebulisation of carnitine we suggest a significant delay of pulmonary absorption of inhaled salbutamol and GW597901 due to competition for a cation/carnitine drug transporter, most likely OCTN2.