Religious leaders' position toward female genital cutting and their perspectives on the relationship between the Islamic religion and this practice.

This study aimed to understand the position of religious leaders toward female genital cutting (FGC) and their perspectives on the relationship between the Islamic religion and FGC. In-depth interviews were conducted with 29 religious leaders in Erbil governorate, Iraqi Kurdistan region from June 2016 to May 2017 using a semi-structured interview guide. Most interviewees supported the continuation of FGC or thought that it should be at least permissible. Religious requirement and reducing the sexual activity of girls and women were the primary reasons for supporting FGC. The religious leaders disagreed about whether Islam requires, encourages, permits, or discourages the practice. The religious leaders generally agreed that most of the Islamic religious scripts about FGC are weak, and no clear and strong hadiths encourage FGC. However, they believed that some hadiths suggest that Islam requires FGC and that no hadiths prohibit FGC. The absence of open opposition to FGC in a context in which legislation has banned this practice was notable. The position of many religious leaders toward FGC is potentially shaped by the cultural interest in feminine chastity and virginity. Religious leaders need to explore different Islamic law schools and consider the religious disagreement and medical evidence about FGC.

Knowledge and perspectives of female genital cutting among the local religious leaders in Erbil governorate, Iraqi Kurdistan region.

BACKGROUND: Religious leaders are one of the key actors in the issue of female genital cutting (FGC) due to the influential position they have in the community and the frequent association of FGC with the religion. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and perspectives of the local religious leaders in Erbil governorate, Iraqi Kurdistan Region about different aspects of FGC. METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with a sample of 29 local religious leaders. A semi-structured questionnaire was used that included questions about their knowledge, understanding, and perspectives on different aspects of FGC such as the reasons for practicing it, their contact and communication with the community regarding the practice and perspectives about banning the practice by law. RESULTS: Participants believed that FGC is useful for reducing or regulating the sexual desire of women to prevent adultery and engagement in pre and extramarital sexual relations and to enhance hygiene of women. They indicated that there is no any risk in doing FGC if there is no excessive cut. Most participants indicated that FGC is attributed to the religion and some considered it a tradition mixed with the religion. People rarely ask the advice of the religious leaders regarding FGC, but they frequently complain about the effects of the practice. Participants did not support having a law to ban FGC either because they thought it would be against the religion's advice on FGC or it will not work. CONCLUSIONS: The local religious leaders lack adequate knowledge about different aspects of FGC particularly the health consequences. There are different and disputing viewpoints about the reasons for practicing FGC, and there is poor support for having a law banning the practice. There is an essential need for enhancing the knowledge of the local religious leaders regarding FGC and its adverse effects on the women's health.