Restorative Proctocolectomy in Ulcerative Colitis: Effect of Preoperative Immunomodulatory Therapy on Postoperative Complications and Pouch Failure.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with ulcerative colitis are often treated with multiple immunomodulative agents to achieve remission. In refractory disease, the next option is frequently proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. No consensus exists as to whether immunomodulatory therapy at the time of ileal pouch surgery leads to any increase in postoperative complications. Our aim was to assess, in ulcerative colitis patients with restorative proctocolectomy, the effect of preoperative anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy and corticosteroids on postoperative complications and pouch failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective medical record review of 445 patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in Helsinki University Hospital between January 2005 and June 2016. RESULTS: Anti-tumor necrosis factor agents were not associated with postoperative complications. Only high-dose corticosteroids (prednisolone ⩾20 mg or equivalent) were associated with higher incidence of anastomotic leak (12.6% vs 2.5%, P = 0.002) and wound dehiscence (4.2% vs 0%, P = 0.019), but pouch failure rate was no higher (2.1% vs 0%, P = 0.141) than in patients without corticosteroid treatment. A lower dosage of corticosteroids had no effect on early postoperative complications, but pouch failure rate was increased (4.4% vs 0%, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Corticosteroids, but not anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy, were associated with postoperative complications. Preoperative use of corticosteroids may increase pouch failure rate, but the risk is still minor in high-volume centers performing ileal pouch surgery.

Morbidity related to diverting ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis.

AIM: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is considered by many surgeons to be the standard procedure for surgical management of ulcerative colitis. There is controversy about whether or not a covering ileostomy should be constructed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and morbidity for patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent restorative proctocolectomy with or without a diverting ileostomy. METHOD: This is a retrospective study of a consecutive series of 510 patients with ulcerative colitis who were operated on in Helsinki University Hospital between January 2005 and June 2016. A diverting ileostomy was performed in 119 patients (the stoma group) compared with 391 patients with no stoma. RESULTS: Dehydration and intestinal obstruction occurred more often in the stoma group (P < 0.0001). Clinical anastomotic leakage was more common among patients without an ileostomy (6.6% vs 1.7%, P = 0.04). However, the need for re-laparotomy because of any early complication did not differ between the groups (P = 0.58). Within 3 months, 50 patients with ileostomy (42.0%) and 51 patients without (13.0%) were readmitted (P < 0.0001). In total, 35 patients (29.3%) had a complication relating to ileostomy closure and four of them required surgery. There was no difference in the rate of fistulas, pouchitis or pouch failure between the groups. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that a diverting ileostomy is associated with considerable morbidity but it does not seem to prevent later failure of the pouch. We suggest that a diverting ileostomy should only be constructed for high-risk patients.