Application of new innovations/technology for care of end-stage renal disease in a resource-limited environment.

The costs involved in the management of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are overwhelming the healthcare commitments of countries worldwide and even more so in resource-limited settings. Some countries have intelligently managed to implement universal healthcare coverage for their citizens. Many others, unable to achieve this, have sensibly concentrated on spending their limited resources on less expensive but more important healthcare issues, such as preventive care especially in the areas of waterborne diseases and implementation of universal vaccination. This however leaves a large section of the population with ESRD vulnerable, and it is up to the various stakeholders, including the medical professions, to innovate and partly alleviate their suffering as a social responsibility.

How can we advance in renal replacement therapy techniques? / ¿Cómo podemos progresar en las técnicas de sustitución de la función renal?

End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although the incidence of ESRD is relatively stable, the prevalence of maintenance dialysis is increasing, and it is expected to reach a staggering 5439 million patients worldwide by 2030. Despite the great technological evolution that has taken place in recent years, most patients are still treated with in-centre haemodialysis and their prognosis remains far from desirable. Since 1980, there has been an increasing interest in the development of a portable device for renal replacement therapy (RRT), which ultimately led to the creation of the Wearable Artificial Kidney (WAK) and the Wearable Ultrafiltration (WUF) system. Portable RRT devices may be acceptable alternatives that deal with several unmet clinical needs of ESRD patients. So far, 3 important human studies with WAK and WUF have been carried out and, although these devices require considerable technological improvement, their safety and efficacy in solute clearance and fluid removal is undeniable. In this article, we review the evolution of the WAK and the WUF and the main clinical trials performed, highlighting some of their technical features. Some of the main possible clinical advantages that could be achieved with these devices, as well as some economic aspects, are also pointed out. In the future, all renal replacement therapy techniques should evolve to perfectly match the clinical and personal needs of each patient, allowing for an improved health-related quality of life

La enfermedad renal crónica terminal (ERCT) es una de las principales causas de morbimortalidad mundial. Aunque la incidencia de esta enfermedad es relativamente estable, la prevalencia en diálisis está aumentando, y se espera que llegue a la cifra de 5.439 millones de pacientes en todo el mundo en el año 2030. A pesar de la gran evolución tecnológica ocurrida en los últimos años, la mayoría de los pacientes continúan siendo tratados con hemodiálisis, y su pronóstico queda lejos de lo deseable. Desde 1980, existe un interés creciente en el desarrollo de dispositivos portátiles para la terapia de sustitución de la función renal (TSFR), y que llevaron a la creación del Wearable Artificial Kidney (WAK) y del Wearable Ultrafiltration (WUF) system. Estos pueden ser alternativas aceptables que permiten alcanzar las necesidades de los pacientes con ERCT, que hasta ahora no se han alcanzado. A pesar de que estos dispositivos necesitan mejoras tecnológicas, su seguridad y eficacia en el aclaramiento de solutos y la eliminación de fluidos es innegable. Revisamos la evolución del WAK y del WUF, y los principales ensayos clínicos desarrollados, destacando algunas de sus particularidades tecnológicas. Adicionalmente, señalamos algunas de las posibles ventajas clínicas que podrían ser alcanzadas con estos dispositivos, así como algunos aspectos económicos. En el futuro, todas las TSFR deben evolucionar para satisfacer todas las necesidades clínicas y personales de cada paciente, permitiendo una mejor calidad de vida relacionada con la salud

Wearable artificial kidney and wearable ultrafiltration device vascular access-future directions.

BACKGROUND: Since 2005, three human clinical trials have been performed with the Wearable Artificial Kidney (WAK) and Wearable Ultrafiltration (WUF) device. The lack of an adequate vascular access (VA) has been pointed out as the main limitation to their implementation. Based on the current level of understanding, we will make the first conceptual proposal of an adequate VA suitable for the WAK and the WUF. METHODS: All the literature related to WAK and WUF was reviewed. Based on eight main publications the VA major characteristics were defined: a mean blood flow of 100 mL/min; the capability to allow prolonged and frequent dialysis treatments, without interfering in activities of daily living (ADL); safe and convenient connection/disconnection systems; reduced risk of biofilm formation and coagulation; high biocompatibility. A research was done in order to answer to each necessary technological prerequisites. RESULTS: The use of a device similar to a CVC with a 5Fr lumen, seems to be the most feasible option. Totally subcutaneous port devices, like the LifeSite(R) or Dialock (R) systems can be a solution to allow WAK or WUF to operate continuously while patients carry out their ADL. Recently, macromolecules that reduce the risk of thrombosis and infection and are integrated into a CVC have been developed and have the capability of overcoming these major limitations. CONCLUSION: With an adequate VA, portable HD devices can be acceptable options to address several unmet clinical needs of HD patients.

How can we advance in renal replacement therapy techniques?

End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although the incidence of ESRD is relatively stable, the prevalence of maintenance dialysis is increasing, and it is expected to reach a staggering 5439 million patients worldwide by 2030. Despite the great technological evolution that has taken place in recent years, most patients are still treated with in-centre haemodialysis and their prognosis remains far from desirable. Since 1980, there has been an increasing interest in the development of a portable device for renal replacement therapy (RRT), which ultimately led to the creation of the Wearable Artificial Kidney (WAK) and the Wearable Ultrafiltration (WUF) system. Portable RRT devices may be acceptable alternatives that deal with several unmet clinical needs of ESRD patients. So far, 3 important human studies with WAK and WUF have been carried out and, although these devices require considerable technological improvement, their safety and efficacy in solute clearance and fluid removal is undeniable. In this article, we review the evolution of the WAK and the WUF and the main clinical trials performed, highlighting some of their technical features. Some of the main possible clinical advantages that could be achieved with these devices, as well as some economic aspects, are also pointed out. In the future, all renal replacement therapy techniques should evolve to perfectly match the clinical and personal needs of each patient, allowing for an improved health-related quality of life.

Blue Planet dialysis: novel water-sparing strategies for reducing dialysate flow.

INTRODUCTION: Hemodialysis (HD) is an expensive therapy in economic and in ecological terms, owing to a high carbon footprint and significant consumption of natural sources, especially water. Our aim was to review strategies to diminish waste of water in maintenance dialysis, exploring previously described water reuse trends and less known strategies for reducing the dialysate flow. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of water-sparing strategies, including the reuse of reverse osmosis rejected water and the reduction of dialysate flux. We performed a search in Medline, Pubmed, Scielo, OVID and Biblioteca Redentor, using key words: Dialysate flow rate, Dialysate flux, and decrease; excluding: online, peritoneal, continuous, blood access, needle, hemodiafiltration, acute, pharmacokinetics, increase. We limited our search to adult humans or in vitro trials in English, Spanish, Italian and Portuguese, between January 1980 and June 2017. We found 816 trials. 37 articles were retrieved for review, and 11 articles were analyzed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Conservation of water in chronic HD should be considered an important responsibility of healthcare practitioners all over the world. We present a wider usage of dialysate flow rates, considering that it would lead to significant water conservation without much compromise on dialysis efficacy in small patients. We believe that further investigation into the utility of reduced dialysate flux in different populations is needed to broaden our understanding of how we can use these techniques in order to significantly reduce water consumption during chronic HD while still ensuring optimum efficacy and efficiency of the therapy.

Worldwide Experiences with Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis.

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is common in the elderly population, and renal replacement therapy (RRT) is often required. However, in this particular subgroup of patients, the choice between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) is often not an easy decision to make. Published literature has adequately demonstrated that PD prevalence is significantly less than HD across all patient age groups despite several advantages. We also know that elderly patients are less likely to complete a PD assessment, due to both medical and social barriers. Additionally, elderly patients are often reluctant to go ahead with PD despite being eligible PD candidates, mainly due to the fear of performing self-therapy. Recently, many new assisted PD (asPD) programs have cropped up in several countries. The main aim of these programs is to overcome barriers to PD and to promote PD utilization among elderly and non-self-sufficient patients. Although asPD has proven to be associated with good clinical results, there still remain concerns about its greater use. In this review, we will first describe an ideal asPD model and then enumerate examples of strategies and outcomes associated with successful asPD programs worldwide.

The role of economies of scale in the cost of dialysis across the world: a macroeconomic perspective.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of chronic kidney disease through dialysis is a considerable expense in most health systems. The two chief methods of providing dialysis, haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) have significant differences in cost composition and factors of production. The aim of this article is to identify and quantify the macroeconomic variables that influence the relative cost of such modalities across different countries. METHODS: From previously published literature, we extracted the estimates of HD/PD cost ratios in a total of 46 countries. We conducted a multivariate regression analysis using the estimated HD/PD cost ratio in each country, with several country level indicators as explanatory variables. We found a strong statistical effect of the following variables on the HD/PD cost ratio: country's level of development, economies of scale and percentage of private health-care expenditure. RESULTS: The statistical effects on HD/PD ratio by local manufacturing and relaxed import regulation of PD equipment were calculated and were found to be very significant. CONCLUSIONS: it is possible for a country to still reap the benefits of economies of scale in provision of PD, even in the absence of a large enough market to make local production of PD equipment feasible in that country.

Healthcare systems and chronic kidney disease: putting the patient in control.

Today, health policy seems to be on the top of governments' agendas around the world. Healthcare systems are challenged by a number of phenomena happening on a global scale; these trends include demographic change in terms of an ageing population, an increase in chronic disease, patients having higher expectations on healthcare delivery and above all a major pressure on public finances to slow increasing healthcare expenditures. Such developments are forcing policy-makers to reform healthcare systems. First, there is a tendency towards decentralization of responsibilities. Second, governments are moving towards reimbursement schemes rewarding good outcomes and performance. Third, great importance is being attributed to transparency and accountability, and to introduce competition in healthcare. Fourth, attention is being shifted from simple treatment of a disease towards preventive initiatives, in a more holistic approach to health. Finally, healthcare policy-makers are recognizing the importance of empowering patients to give them control over decisions regarding their own health. These dynamics can be observed in chronic kidney disease, the management of which is a huge economic burden to healthcare systems globally, and which represents a good example of a field where important changes can be witnessed in therapy, technology, delivery and financing.

Cost of peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis across the world.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) as a modality is underutilized in most parts of the world today despite several advantages including the possibility of it being offered in the remotest of locations and being significantly more affordable than haemodialysis (HD) in most cases. In this article, we will compare the cost of HD and PD in several countries to demonstrate that PD is less than, or at least as expensive as, HD. A thorough literature survey of EMBASE and PUBMED was conducted; 78 articles which compared the annual PD and annual HD costs were finally selected. Careful attention was paid to the methodology followed by each study and the year it was published in. Our final calculations included 46 countries (20 developed and 26 developing). We found that the cost of HD was between 1.25 and 2.35 times the cost of PD in 22 countries (17 developed and 5 developing), between 0.90 and 1.25 times the cost of PD in 15 countries (2 developed and 13 developing), and between 0.22 and 0.90 times the cost of PD in 9 countries (1 developed and 8 developing). From our analysis, it is evident that most developed countries can provide PD at a lesser expense to the healthcare system than HD. The evidence on developing countries is more mixed, but in most cases PD can be provided at a similar cost where economies of scale have been achieved, either by local production or by low import duties on PD equipment.