Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ultrasonics ; 91: 201-205, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30139568

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of Phonophoresis (PP) with the combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID's) and myorelaxant versus routine Ultrasound (US) treatment with non-therapeutic gel on the patients with acute low back pain (ABP). METHODS: Sixty patients with ABP were randomly assigned into 2 groups. In Group 1 (n = 30) US was applied using diclofenac + Thiocolchicoside gel for 10 min and for a total of 10 sessions. In Group 2 (n = 30) the same US protocol was applied with the same setting and timing with Group 1 using US gel that does not contain any pharmaceutical ingredient. Evaluation parameters were Visual numeric scale (VNS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Shober test. RESULTS: Comparison of the results obtained from the two groups before treatment and at second (W2) and sixth weeks (W6) posttreatment showed significant improvement in all parameters in both groups (p < 0.05). Comparison of the groups showed significantly superior improvement in Group 1 for ODI while there was no difference in other parameters at W2. At W6, there was significantly superior improvement in all parameters (p < 0.05) except for Shober test in Group1. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that PP treatment is superior than conventional US therapy at short term in ABP patients.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Colchicina/análogos & derivados , Diclofenaco/administração & dosagem , Dor Lombar/terapia , Fonoforese , Terapia por Ultrassom , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Colchicina/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Géis , Humanos , Dor Lombar/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Limiar da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Rheumatol Int ; 38(5): 895-904, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29594333

RESUMO

In mild and moderate cases of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the conservative approach is suggested. The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the effect of low-power laser versus the combination of low-power laser and kinesiotaping on pain, muscle strength, functionality, and electrophysiologic parameters in the patients with CTS. The study was planned as single-blind, prospective, randomized control. 64 hands diagnosed with CTS were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups by closed envelope method. Low-power laser therapy was applied to Group 1 (21 hands), kinesiotaping and low-power laser therapy in group 2 (22 hands), sham laser therapy in Group 3 (21 hands). All patients were assessed by visual numeric pain scale (VNS), hand grip strength (HGS), finger pinch strength (FPS), the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTSQ), before treatment, after treatment (3rd week), and after (12th week) 3 months the treatment with the same physician. Motor and sensory nerve conduction studies were performed with electroneuromyography (ENMG) before the treatment (0th week) and at the end of the 12th week. Comparison of the group 1 with the group 3 showed significantly better improvement in the former in VNS, BCTSQ at 3rd week and 12th week compared to 0th week, and in FPS and HGS at 3rd week. Comparison of the group 2 with the group 3 showed significantly better improvement in the former VNS, BCTSQ, FPS and HGS at 3rd and 12th week compared to 0th week. When Group 1 and Group 2 were compared there was no statistically significant difference in any parameters in the 3rd week, but there was a statistically significant difference in favor of group 2 in FPS and HGS parameters at the 12th week. We have found that the kinesiotaping method applied with low-power laser treatment does not provide any additional benefit to the low-power laser treatment in the short term, however, in the long term, the increase in the HGS and FPS has occurred. In conclusion, low-power laser and kinesiotaping method in the treatment of CTS may be an effective and reliable treatment option in clinical parameters.


Assuntos
Fita Atlética , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/radioterapia , Lasers Semicondutores/uso terapêutico , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/instrumentação , Adulto , Fita Atlética/efeitos adversos , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/diagnóstico , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/fisiopatologia , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Lasers Semicondutores/efeitos adversos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Condução Nervosa , Exame Neurológico , Medição da Dor , Projetos Piloto , Força de Pinça , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Método Simples-Cego , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Turquia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...