Prevalence and Treatment Choices for Couples with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Due to Structural Chromosomal Anomalies.

OBJECTIVE: Parental carriers of balanced structural chromosomal rearrangements such as reciprocal or Robertsonian translocations are at increased risk of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) due to the production of gametes with unbalanced non-viable chromosome variants. As a purported means of improving reproductive outcomes in this population, IVF and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) have been introduced as an alternative to natural conception and prenatal diagnosis. In this study, we evaluate the prevalence and treatment choices of couples with structural chromosomal rearrangement referred to a tertiary care RPL clinic. In addition, we compare the two methods of management in terms of live birth rate. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of 2321 couples who were referred to a highly specialized RPL clinic for ongoing clinical management between January 2005 and December 2013 (n = 23). Couples who pursued PGD through local fertility centres during this time were also included (n = 13). RESULTS: Thirty-six couples (1.6%) were found to be parental carriers of a structural chromosomal rearrangement. In this cohort, couples were twice as likely to pursue natural conception compared with IVF with PGD. No significant differences were observed in live birth rate between PGD and clinical management (66.6% vs. 53.3%, P = 0.717). With PGD management, six live birth outcomes were observed, with an incidence of one birth in 5.63 years of follow-up. With clinical management, 24 live birth outcomes were observed, with an incidence of one birth in 4.09 years of follow-up. Mean time to live birth was 17.5 months and 23.3 months in clinical management and PGD, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among couples presenting to a tertiary RPL clinic, parental carriers of structural chromosomal rearrangement and history of RPL are more likely to pursue natural conception over IVF and PGD. With regards to reproductive outcomes, no significant difference in miscarriage rate, time to live birth, or live birth rate was observed between couples who pursued PGD compared with expectant clinical management.

Altered gene expression of H19 and IGF2 in placentas from ART pregnancies.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to determine whether the gene expression and associated DNA methylation regulation of H19 and IGF2 are altered in placentas conceived by assisted reproductive technologies (ART) compared to natural conceptions. METHODS: 113 pregnancies were recruited resulting in 119 placentas (83 singletons and 36 twins), where 56 were conceived via in vitro fertilization (IVF), 41 via intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and 22 naturally. Regulation of imprinting of H19 and IGF2 was determined by the DNA methylation status at three CpG sites within the H19 imprinting control region 1 (ICR1) using bisulphite pyrosequencing. Expression of H19 and IGF2 in 45 of these placentas (17 IVF, 14 ICSI, and 14 NC) was measured by determining the relative mRNA transcript levels using RT-qPCR in placental villi. RESULTS: Placental weight and birth weight were not significantly different between groups. H19 expression was significantly increased in both IVF and ICSI placentas when compared to controls (1.8 and 1.9 fold higher, respectively). Conversely, IGF2 was significantly decreased in both ART groups (0.8 and 0.7 fold lower, respectively). Mean DNA methylation at ICR1 was found to be similar between all groups. No correlation was found between DNA methylation at ICR1 and expression of either gene. However, a significant inverse relationship was found between H19 and IGF2 expression. CONCLUSION: We provide evidence of altered H19 and IGF2 expression in ART placentas. The altered expression pattern may suggest a loss of imprinting on the paternal allele. Furthermore, these alterations may not be entirely associated with DNA methylation at ICR1. We show further indirect evidence of the H19-IGF2 inverse expression pattern.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome prevention strategies: reducing the human chorionic gonadotropin trigger dose.

This article reviews the biological plausibility and evidence for the use of a low triggering dose of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). A systematic search of the literature revealed very little published data for or against the use of low-dose hCG in the prevention of OHSS after assisted reproductive technology. We have had success at avoiding OHSS as a result of gentle stimulation and low-dose sliding scale hCG trigger based on estradiol (E2) levels. We therefore present the biological plausibility for such an approach by reviewing the relationship between OHSS, vascular endothelial growth factor, and hCG; the physiology of hCG; the relationship between risk of OHSS and E2 at trigger; and the physiology of alternative methods of triggering such as recombinant luteinizing hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. We also present the results of a quasi-experimental before and after study of the sliding scale protocol for hCG trigger dose in in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Taking a basal follicle-stimulating hormone history is essential before initiating in vitro fertilization.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze IVF outcomes in patients with a history of one or more elevations in basal FSH who have a normal basal FSH at the start of their IVF cycle, compared with the general IVF population. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): General IVF patient population. INTERVENTION(S): Patients received standard IVF gonadotropin protocols, oocyte retrieval, and embryo transfer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Oocyte yield, fertilization, implantation, clinical pregnancy, and cancellation rate. RESULT(S): Oocyte yields were lower in patients with a history of elevated basal FSH, for all age groups, and showed an age-dependent decline in all patients. Over the age of 40 years, both implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were lower in these patients, with no significant difference observed in patients under the age of 40 years. No pregnancies were observed in patients with a history of three or more elevated FSH levels, regardless of age. CONCLUSION(S): A history of elevated basal FSH levels in patients under the age of 40 years predicts a lower oocyte yield in IVF cycles with normal basal FSH levels but does not translate to either lower pregnancy or implantation rates. Patients aged >40 years with prior elevations in basal FSH levels have both compromised ovarian response and compromised embryo quality relative to those with normal FSH levels, as illustrated by lower oocyte yield, higher cancellation rates, and lower implantation and pregnancy rates.

Insulin-sensitizing agents as primary therapy for patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome.

BACKGROUND: This paper is a systematic review of metformin versus clomiphene citrate (CC) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) and QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses (QUOROM) guidelines were followed. A systematic computerized literature search was done of seven bibliographic databases. Inclusion criteria included cohort and randomized controlled trials (RCT) of women with PCOS and the following medications: metformin versus placebo; metformin versus CC; metformin plus CC versus placebo plus CC. Rev-man 4.1 and Metaview 4.0 were used to analyse data. Relative risk (RR) estimates were presented. A chi2-test determined the significance of the association. Heterogeneity was determined by the Cochran Q-test. RESULTS: Metformin was 50% better than placebo for ovulation induction in infertile PCOS patients [RR 1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13, 1.99]. Metformin was also of benefit in non-infertile (i.e. patients with PCOS who were not complaining of infertility) PCOS patients for cycle regulation compared to placebo (RR 1.45; CI 1.11, 1.90). Metformin was not of confirmed benefit versus placebo for achievement of pregnancy (RR 1.07; CI 0.20, 5.74). Metformin plus CC may be 3-4-fold superior to CC alone for ovulation induction (RR 3.04; CI 1.77, 5.24) and pregnancy (RR 3.65; CI 1.11, 11.99) in women with PCOS. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin is effective for ovulation induction and cycle regulation in this group of patients. Metformin plus CC appears to be very effective for achievement of pregnancy compared to CC alone. No RCTs directly compare metformin to CC but the need for such a trial exists.

Assisted reproductive technology and the incidence of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the available literature regarding the relationship between assisted reproductive technology and ovarian cancer. DATA SOURCES: Computerized search of 6 databases from 1966 (or closest) to present: Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cancerlit, CINHAL, Current Contents, PubMed in process (formerly called PreMEDLINE), and MEDLINE. We collected references from the bibliographies of reviews, original research articles, content experts, and conference proceedings to find published and unpublished literature. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Case-control and cohort studies are included. The population of interest is treated infertile women, the control population is untreated infertile women, and the intervention or exposure of interest includes the following fertility medications: clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, human chorionic gonadotropin, and gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists. The primary outcome is incident, primary ovarian cancer. Three cohort and 7 case-control studies were included in the quantitative analyses. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scales were used. Two investigators independently extracted study methods, sources of bias, and outcomes. The following information was recorded: publication information, subject characteristics, intervention information and outcomes. Studies combined were sufficiently homogeneous for quantitative summary. Case-control and cohort data showed a significantly elevated risk for exposure of infertility medications and ovarian cancer in subjects who underwent assisted reproductive technology compared with general population controls (1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18 to 1.97). When cases of ovarian cancer were compared with infertile controls for exposure to infertility medications, the odds ratio (0.99; 95% CI 0.67, 1.45) was not elevated. However, cohort data comparing outcome in treated infertile patients with untreated infertile patients suggests that treated patients may tend to a lower incidence of ovarian cancer-odds ratio = 0.67 (95% CI 0.32, 1.41). CONCLUSION: Ovarian cancer does not appear to be increased in treated infertile patients versus untreated infertile patients. Treated infertile patients may have a lower incidence of ovarian cancer than untreated infertile patients.