RESUMO
The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized cancer treatment. These drugs function by inhibiting the binding of programmed death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand, PD-L1, which inhibits the immune response against cancer cells. Nivolumab is a PD-1 inhibitor that specifically targets the PD-1 pathway. The main side effects of these drugs are unpredictable immune-related toxicities that occur when self-reactive T cells are abnormally activated and cause inflammation in various organs. The organs most often affected are the endocrine glands, lungs, skin, and gut. Recognizing and addressing lung inflammation is crucial, particularly in individuals with lung cancer. However, it can be challenging to diagnose due to the distinctive features of their disease and treatment regimen. This case report presents a 66-year-old man with a medical history of hypertension, chronic kidney disease (stage 3A), hypothyroidism, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder with interstitial pneumonitis secondary to nivolumab. The patient presented to the Eisenhower Medical Center, Rancho Mirage, CA, with dyspnea and cough for two weeks. He received methylprednisolone (Solu-Medrol) at 1.0 mg/kg for immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced pneumonitis and was discharged on 1 liter (L)/min home-oxygen therapy along with prednisone 50 mg twice daily (BD) for six weeks, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim) DS BD, and pantoprazole (Protonix) 40 mg once daily. Subsequently, nivolumab therapy was discontinued. At his follow-up visit two weeks later, he felt well and did not need oxygen therapy at rest.
RESUMO
Background The prevalence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is growing in Pakistan; however, there are no national screening programs or guidelines in place to curb its development. This study was conducted with the aim of ascertaining public awareness and attitudes regarding CRC and current screening practices. Furthermore, the study assessed perceived barriers which could impact future screening processes. Methods A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted among urban dwellers of Karachi, Pakistan. We excluded any individuals belonging to the medical profession, those diagnosed previously with CRC or having any significant co-morbidity. The validated and pre-tested questionnaire was administered among the study participants to record demographic information, awareness of CRC risk factors, symptoms and screening tests. Attitudes towards screening and perceived barriers to screening were also assessed. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 20.0) (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). A knowledge score, out of a total of 14 points was calculated to reflect a participant's overall knowledge regarding CRC risk factors and signs/symptoms. Results The prevalence of CRC screening in eligible individuals (50 years or older) was 2.6% in our study population. Positive attitudes towards CRC management and screening were observed, with 75.1% (n = 296) acknowledging the preventive role of screening tests. Despite this only 14.9% (n = 58) of study participants expressed a future desire to undergo screening. Major barriers to screening were reported to be "a lack of knowledge regarding the screening procedure", a "lack of screening facilities" and that the "screening procedure is too expensive". A majority (n = 285, 72.3%) of the participants expressed a greater willingness to undergo screening if their doctor recommended it. Conclusion A national CRC screening and awareness program should be launched to promote awareness and facilitate screening in risk groups. General practitioners are needed to play a key role in counseling patients and endorsing healthy screening practices.
