Stent erosion after treatment of coarctation of right-sided aorta and successful surgical management.

We present a case of surgical treatment of a pseudoaneurysm of the right-sided aortic arch after stent implantation for primary coarctation in a 36-year-old woman with a previous history of ventricle septal defect closure in early childhood. As a first step, she underwent a left carotid to subclavian artery bypass for an aberrant left subclavian artery and as a second step a 'beating heart' aortic arch and descending aorta replacement via resternotomy. The postoperative course was uneventful.

Surgical versus endovascular revascularization of subclavian artery arteriosclerotic disease.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment offers an alternative, less invasive approach to open repair for subclavian artery atherosclerotic disease (SAAD). However, only few studies compared the outcomes of both strategies in the long run. This study reports on the performance of endovascular and surgical revascularization for SAAD. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients treated for SAAD at two institutions between January 1998 and December 2015. Primary outcome of this study was the composite endpoint of reintervention-free survival (RFS) defined as time to reintervention and/or death from any cause. Secondary endpoints included primary patency (PPR) and secondary patency (SPR) rates as well as overall survival and time to reintervention. RESULTS: Surgical treatment was the preferred treatment option in 27 (25%) patients, while 83 (75%) patients underwent primary stent therapy. The median follow-up was 87 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 38 to 151) in the surgical group and 27 (IQR: 12 to 59) in the endovascular (P=0.0001). Severe arterial wall calcification was more commonly observed in the surgical arm (P<0.0001), while mild and moderate calcification in the endovascular (P=0.0004 and P=0.014). Vessel occlusion was more frequent among patients treated surgically (100% vs. 34%, P<0.0001). At 98 months RFS was significantly higher after surgical treatment (95% vs. 54%, HR: 8.4, 95% CI: 3.9 to 18.1, P=0.0002). Although overall survival did not differ significantly between the two groups (HR: 4.28, 95% CI: 0.86 to 21.22, P=0.093), open repair was associated with reduced reintervention rate (HR: 12.04, 95% CI: 4.98 to 29.12, P=0.001). The PPR at 98 months following surgical and endovascular therapy amounted to 96% and 65% (HR: 12.87, 95% CI: 5.44 to 30.44, P=0.0008) respectively. No significant difference was observed regarding the SPR between the two groups (100% vs. 95%, P=0.090). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment was associated in this cohort with increased patency and a significant reduction of reinterventions compared to the endovascular approach.

Outcomes of Surgical Explantation of Infected Aortic Grafts After Endovascular and Open Abdominal Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVES: Infection of the vascular graft represents one of the most threatening complications after aortic repair. It is rare and associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The aim of this study was to present short-term outcomes after surgical treatment of infected aortic grafts after endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). METHODS: Data of all patients affected by aortic graft infection after aneurysm repair who underwent an explantation of a conventional or endovascular aortic graft between January 2008 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent in situ reconstruction using a rifampicin soaked synthetic graft. The primary endpoint of this study was 30 day mortality; secondary endpoints were major post-operative complications. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included in the cohort, 16 with an infected endograft (iEVAR) and 10 patients with an infected conventional graft (iOAR). Thirty-day mortality was 23.1% overall, 37.5% for iEVAR and 0% (p = .027) for iOAR. Post-operative major complications occurred in eight (50%) patients from the iEVAR group and in four (40%) patients from the iOAR group (p = .619). The supravisceral clamping rate was higher in patients with infected iEVAR (93.8 vs. 20%, p = .001), furthermore a greater incidence of post-operative acute kidney injury was observed (50 vs. 0%, p = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Explantation of the graft and in situ reconstruction for aortic graft infection is accepted as the therapy of choice. However, re-operation for iEVAR is related to significantly higher mortality and morbidity rates. The need for suprarenal aortic clamping seems to be a possible explanation for worse outcomes in iEVAR.

Differential response to endothelial epithelial sodium channel inhibition ex vivo correlates with arterial stiffness in humans.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, the nanomechanical properties (i.e. stiffness) of endothelial cells have been identified as crucial for appropriate endothelial function. One major determinant of endothelial stiffness is the endothelial sodium channel (EnNaC). EnNaC-dependent stiffening leads to reduced nitric oxide release, which is a hallmark for endothelial dysfunction. In the current study, we hypothesized that endothelial function is directly linked to the overall function of the arterial system. METHODS: Sixty-four human ex-vivo arterial samples were collected from femoral bypass or vein-stripping procedures. Nanomechanical characteristics of ex-vivo endothelium from isolated arterial side branches were determined using atomic force microscopy. The endothelium's potential to respond to EnNaC inhibition by amiloride was defined as endothelial amiloride index. In addition, patients' arterial stiffness was determined by pulse wave velocity (PWV). RESULTS: Fifty-three percentage of the ex-vivo samples responded 'classically' to amiloride with endothelial softening, whereas 47% of the patients' samples did not. Interestingly, a lack of endothelial softening in the presence of amiloride in vitro was observed with higher frequency among samples obtained from individuals with elevated PWV. Further, an increased PWV was associated with impaired renal function and endothelial dysfunction (higher levels of von Willebrand factor). CONCLUSIONS: Here, we report differential responses of human ex-vivo vessels to amiloride. Although the mechanism of differential amiloride response is still unknown, the data indicate that drug action on endothelial function could differ strongly among patients, especially in those with a vascular end-organ damage determined by PWV.

Surgical treatment of lumbosacral pseudarthrosis and spondyloptosis in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1 and a large lumbar anterior meningocele. Case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar anterior meningocele (MC) is rare in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Although spinal fusion with maximum possible resection of the cele might be indicated in these special cases, reports describing operative procedures are lacking. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: We present a young woman with NF1 and lower back pain due to lumbar anterior MC, extensive osteolysis, and deformation of the lumbar spine. After Harrington spondylodesis from T12 to S1 in 1989, she developed lumbosacral pseudarthrosis and transcutaneous migration of the spondylodesis. Thus the left pole of the spondylodesis was shortened below the level of L5 in 2005. Years later, the patient presented with lower back pain and wound infection. Imaging revealed the MC and avulsion of the right S1 screw with lumbosacral pseudarthrosis and spondyloptosis, and transcutaneous migration of the right spondylodesis pole. Three-stage surgery was indicated with explantation of the Harrington system in the first step and posterior fusion from T10 to S2 in the second step. Finally, vertebral resection, gathering of the cele, and implantation of a customized titanium cage was achieved through an anterior transabdominal approach. Postoperatively, the patient reported sufficient reduction of lower back pain. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar anterior MC is rare in patients with NF1 and may cause spinal instability. When surgery is indicated, long-range spinal fusion and reduction of the cele should be considered. Surgery may be challenging requiring a staged operative procedure and an interdisciplinary collaboration.

Long-term application of the aldosterone antagonist spironolactone prevents stiff endothelial cell syndrome.

Aldosterone triggers the stiff endothelial cell syndrome (SECS), characterized by an up-regulation of epithelial sodium channels (ENaCs) and mechanical stiffening of the endothelial cell cortex accompanied by endothelial dysfunction. In vivo, aldosterone antagonism exerts sustained protection on the cardiovascular system. To illuminate the molecular mechanisms of this time-dependent effect, a study on endothelial cells in vitro and ex vivo was designed to investigate SECS over time. Endothelia (from human umbilical veins, bovine aortae, and explants of human arteries) were cultured in aldosterone-supplemented medium with or without the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist spironolactone. MR expression, ENaC expression, cortical stiffness, and shear-mediated nitric oxide (NO) release were determined after 3 d (short term) and up to 24 d (long term). Over time, MR expression increased by 129%. ENaC expression and surface abundance increased by 32% and 42% (13.8 to 19.6 molecules per cell surface), paralleled by a 49% rise in stiffness. Spironolactone prevented this development and, after 3 wk of treatment, increased NO release by 50%. Thus, spironolactone improves endothelial function long-lastingly by preventing a time-dependent manifestation of SECS. This emphasizes the key role of vascular endothelium as a therapeutical target in cardiovascular disorders and might explain blood pressure independent actions of MR antagonism.

Endovascular suture versus cutdown for endovascular aneurysm repair: a prospective randomized pilot study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and cost benefits of the percutaneous technique for treatment of aortic aneurysm, a prospective randomized study was performed that compared the endovascular suture technique with conventional cutdown access and repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2002 through July 2002, 30 endografts, including 14 Talent stent-grafts (Medtronic, Sunrise, Fla) and 16 Zenith endografts (Cook, Bloomington, Ind) were implanted in 30 patients for endovascular aneurysm treatment. The patients were randomized to either percutaneous technique (group A) or conventional cutdown (group B). Fifty-five femoral arteries were cannulated with large-bore (14F-25F) introducers and were included in the study. Safety and efficiency of both techniques were assessed by recording the complication rates, operation time, discharge, and time to ambulation. Comparison of selected estimated costs included both variable and fixed costs for femoral access and expenses for treatment of complications. RESULTS: No operative deaths occurred. The complication rates were similar and included 1 arterial thrombosis in each group, 3 lymphoceles in group B, and 1 conversion to cutdown because of bleeding in group A. Mean surgery time (86.7 +/- 27 minutes vs 107.8 +/- 38.5 minutes; P <.05) and time to ambulation (20.1 +/- 4.3 hours vs 33.1 +/- 18.4 hours; P <.001) were significantly shorter in the group treated percutaneously. Because of the cost of the closure device, total cost of the percutaneous technique averaged 99.2 euro; more than cutdown. CONCLUSIONS: The percutaneous technique decreases the invasiveness of endovascular therapy of aortic aneurysm and reduces operative time and time to ambulation. Complications were roughly equivalent in severity. The additional cost for the device appears to justify its use for this form of aneurysm treatment.