RESUMO
BACKGROUND: During 2021 and 2023 two simplified Biological and Behavioural Study (BBS-Lite) surveys, and in 2022 one Standard Integrated Biological and Behavioural Study (IBBS), were conducted among people who inject drugs in seven cities in Georgia. From these, an opportunity to compare the implementation of these survey methods and results was able to be gained. METHODS: The two survey types were compared to find points of similarity and difference in their methodologies. The methodologies of the IBBS and BBS-Lite studies shared many characteristics, including the cities where they were implemented, recruitment criteria, sample sizes, and common questionnaire items. All studies were multi-centre cross-sectional involving administration of a face-to-face behavioural questionnaire and collection of biological specimens for testing of HIV, syphilis, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). The main differences were in the sampling methods. The IBBS utilised respondent-driven sampling (RDS) while participants of the BBS-Lite studies were enrolled through consecutive recruitment at the harm reduction (HR) programme sites and on outreach and through snowball sampling. We compared the results from each study as well as the implementation modalities such as time taken and budgetary requirements, and the complexity of implementation. RESULTS: Considerably less time was required for recruitment, as well as for interviewing, data entry (4 times less) and the analysis for the BSS-Lite studies compared to the IBBS. The BSS-Lite study budgets were at least 2.5 times less than of the IBBS study. The recruited samples were comparable for age distribution, median age at first injection, the last drug injected, sharing of drug injecting equipment or receiving opioid agonist maintenance treatment (OAMT) during the last 12 months. HIV and HCV prevalence were similar including for stratifications by age, client status and city of recruitment. CONCLUSION: Our findings have demonstrated that if implemented on a regular basis, the BBS-Lite can be a complementary solution for systematic data collection, filling surveillance gaps and addressing the challenges that persist in obtaining important data on people who inject drugs (PWID) between IBBS rounds in the country. The methodology is recommended for testing in other settings and in other key populations. In addition, the data collected on a routine base can help the harm reduction (HR) program to better understand the changes in the drug scene and observe new trends in HIV risks and drug injecting behaviours, possible barriers for access to harm reduction, drug treatment, and HIV and/or viral hepatitis testing and treatment services.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Stigmatizing attitude towards HIV/AIDS alongside other factors such as HIV knowledge, substance use, sexual behavior, and involvement in various social activities (e.g., internet use, exposure to media) may be related to likelihood of having HIV counseling and testing (HCT). Thus, we examined these associations among 18-24 year old post-secondary school students in Tbilisi, Georgia. METHODS: We conducted a secondary data analysis of a 2010 cross-sectional survey of 1,879 secondary and post-secondary school students aged 15 to 24 years in Tbilisi, Georgia examining sociodemographics, substance use, sexual behavior, HIV-related knowledge and stigmatizing attitudes, and recreational activities in relation to lifetime HCT. A stratified two-stage cluster sample design was used by the parent study with universities selected with probabilities proportional to their size at the first stage, and with a random selection of students stratified by gender in each of the participating university at the second stage. RESULTS: The vast majority (95.6%) of participants never received HCT. In the multivariate regression model, significant predictors of lifetime receipt of HCT included being married (p = 0.03), not having HIV stigmatized attitude (p = 0.03), more often reading fiction literature (p = 0.02), more often going out in the evenings (p = 0.03), and more often passing time with friends (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intervening on HIV stigmatizing attitudes may be a critical prevention or HCT promotion strategy among youth in Georgia. In order to better inform policy and programs, future research should examine contextual factors in secondary and post-secondary schools that impact HCT among Georgian youth. Specifically, factors impacting differential rates of HCT among males and females, the social stigma and knowledge related to HCT and HIV, and the impact of leisure time activity involvement on HCT should be examined further. In addition, interventions and policies that might impact attitudes toward HIV and HCT should be investigated and considered.
