Effect of glycaemic control on complications following cardiac surgery: literature review.

INTRODUCTION: No uniform consensus in the UK or Europe exists, for glycaemic management of patients with Diabetes or pre-diabetes undergoing cardiac surgery. OBJECTIVE: [i] Determine the relationship between glycaemic control and cardiac surgical outcomes; [ii] Compare current vs gold standard management of patients with Diabetes or pre-diabetes undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Searches of MEDLINE, NHS Evidence and Web of Science databases were completed. Articles were limited to those in English, German and French. No date limit was enforced.13,232 articles were identified on initial literature review, and 50 relevant papers included in this review. RESULTS: No national standards for glycaemic control prior to cardiac surgery were identified. Upto 30% of cardiac surgical patients have undiagnosed Diabetes. Cardiac surgical patients without Diabetes with pre-operative hyperglycaemia have a 1 year mortality double that of patients with normoglyacemia, and equivalent to patients already diagnosed with Diabetes. Pre- and peri-operative hyperglycaemia is associated with worse outcomes. Evidence regarding tight glycaemic control vs moderate glycaemic control is conflicting. Tight control may be more effective in patients without Diabetes with pre-/peri-operative hyperglycaemia, and moderate control appears more effective in patients with pre-existing Diabetes. Patients with well controlled Diabetes may achieve comparable outcomes to patients without Diabetes with similar glycaemic control. CONCLUSIONS: Pre / peri-operative hyperglycaemia is associated with worse outcomes in both patients with, and without Diabetes undergoing CABG. This review supports the pre-operative screening, and optimisation of glycaemic control in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Optimal glycaemic management remains unclear and clear guidelines are needed.

Transradial arterial access catheter knots: how to stay out of trouble.

Transradial access has nowadays become a standard of care for percutaneous coronary angiography and intervention. This approach has demonstrated significant reduction in bleeding rate, length of hospital stay, and improvement in clinical outcomes when compared to the traditional transfemoral approach. Due to its advantages this new access is also increasingly being used in non-coronary visceral or peripheral interventions. However, this novel approach may lead to severe catheter kinking and twisting and further manipulation may be required to unravel the catheter and avoid complication. Purpose of this technical review is to present the current techniques and trends in preventing and resolving issues related to radial access catheter kinks.

Prasugrel versus high dose clopidogrel to overcome early high on clopidogrel platelet reactivity in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: There is a paucity of data regarding the early effectiveness of the proposed 600 mg clopidogrel loading dose (LD) on platelet reactivity (PR) in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. If high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) is present, prasugrel reloading and subsequent maintenance dose (MD), might offer faster and stronger platelet inhibition than high clopidogrel MD. METHODS: In 93 STEMI patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention we assessed PR using the VerifyNow P2Y12 platelet function test, 2 h following 600 mg LD of clopidogrel. All the 60 (64.5 %) patients exhibiting HTPR (defined as PR ≥ 235 P2Y12 reaction units), were randomized to 1 of 2 therapeutic strategies: reloading with prasugrel 60 mg/10 mg MD or high (150 mg) clopidogrel MD. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of PR at 24 h post randomization was lower in the prasugrel compared to the clopidogrel group (51.3, 25.7-77.0 versus 242.4, 215.8-268.9 P2Y12 reaction units, least square estimates, 95 % confidence intervals, p < 0.001). PR at 2 h and 5 days post randomization was lower in the prasugrel compared to the clopidogrel group (117.2, 70.9-163.4 and 101.6, 70.1-133.2 least square mean difference, 95 % confidence intervals, p < 0.001 for both). At all the time points of PR assessment, HTPR rates were lower in prasugrel than in clopidogrel group. CONCLUSIONS: HTPR is commonly observed early post 600 mg clopidogrel LD in STEMI patients. In this case, prasugrel 60 mg LD/10 mg MD provides faster and stronger platelet inhibition than a high clopidogrel MD regimen.

Antiplatelet effects of prasugrel vs. double clopidogrel in patients on hemodialysis and with high on-treatment platelet reactivity.

BACKGROUND: High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) is frequent in patients on hemodialysis (HD) receiving clopidrogel. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to determine the antiplatelet effects of prasugrel vs. high-dose clopidogrel in patients on HD with HTPR. PATIENTS/METHODS: We performed a prospective, single-center, single-blind, investigator-initiated, randomized, crossover study to compare platelet inhibition by prasugrel 10 mg day(-1) with that by high-dose 150 mg day(-1) clopidogrel in 21 patients on chronic HD with HTPR. Platelet function was assessed with the VerifyNow assay, and genotyping was performed for CYP2C19*2 carriage. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of platelet reactivity (PR, measured in P2Y12 reaction units [PRU]) was lower in patients receiving prasugrel (least squares [LS] estimate 156.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 132.2-181.1) than in those receiving high-dose clopidogrel (LS 279.9, 95% CI 255.4-304.3), P < 0.001). The LS mean differences between the two treatments were - 113.4 PRU (95% CI - 152.9 to - 73.8, P < 0.001) and - 163.8 PRU (95% CI - 218.1 to - 109.2, P < 0.001) in non-carriers and carriers of at least one CYP2C19*2 allele, respectively. HTPR rates were lower for prasugrel than clopidogrel, in all patients (19% vs. 85.7%, P < 0.001) and in non-carriers (25.7% vs. 80%, P = 0.003). All carriers continued to show HTPR while receiving high-dose clopidogrel, but none showed it while receiving prasugrel. CONCLUSIONS: In HD patients exhibiting HTPR following standard clopidogrel treatment, prasugrel 10 mg day(-1) is significantly more efficient than doubling the clopidogrel dosage in achieving adequate platelet inhibition. Neither effect seems to be influenced by carriage of the loss-of-function CYP2C19*2 allele.