60 Years of Michigan Plastic Surgery.

In 1964, the Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at the University of Michigan opened its doors to future surgeons and leaders in the field. Today, we are celebrating the 60-year history of the program and its significant contributions to the field. Beginning under the leadership of Reed O. Dingman, MD, DDS, the program began with three faculty members and two independent surgical residents. Since that time, it has expanded dramatically to include 24 faculty members and 28 integrated plastic surgery residents. The goals of the program have always been to achieve excellence in all three of our academic missions including clinical care, teaching, and research. Annually, the program sees an average of 35,000 outpatient clinic visits, 4,000 major operations, 200 peer-reviewed publications, $5,000,000 in research spending, and residents who are well trained and highly competitive for fellowships of their choosing every single year. Through scientific collaborations, academic exchanges, and medical missions, the program's influence has spread beyond Michigan, reaching the entire world. In addition to training world-renowned surgeons, Michigan's faculty and graduates have assumed leadership roles in prestigious professional organizations, scientific journals, and research foundations. In this article, we explore the roots of the program and reflect on six decades of impact, innovation, and inspiration.

"Longitudinal Experience Using Pedicled Buccal Fat Pad Flaps in Cleft Palatoplasty: Mitigating Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Risk and Severity".

BACKGROUND: Cleft palatoplasty commonly results in denuded maxillary bone in the lateral gutter(s) and a posterior void between oral and nasal closures. Bony exposure of the anterior palate subjects the maxilla to scarring and growth restriction, while scar contracture of the posterior void may result in velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) and fistula formation. Utilization of the buccal fat pad flap (BFPF) at the time of palatoplasty provides vascularized tissue over these critical areas, thereby reducing the rate of secondary surgery for speech and fistula revision. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review identified patients who underwent palatoplasty with or without BFPF between 1995-2015. Data collected included cleft type, surgical technique, follow-up duration, and complications. Outcomes included rate of speech surgery and palatal fistula development. Veau phenotype index was computed on a scale of 2-4 as a weighted mean to reflect the frequency of cleft type (Veau II-IV) in BFPF and non-BFPF groups. RESULTS: Charts of 866 patients were reviewed; 212 met inclusion criteria. Of these, 101 received a BFPF. Mean follow-up duration was 11.4 years. Despite a selection bias for more severe clefts, the BFPF group had lower incidence of speech surgery (9.9% vs. 36.9%, p=0.0072). The BFPF group had more mild cases treatable with fat injection (7.9% vs. 2.7%, p=0.0346) and developed fewer fistulas (6.9% vs. 18.0%, p=0.0280). CONCLUSION: Despite the presence of more severe clefts, the BFPF group had a significantly lower rate of speech surgery. The BFPF is a valuable adjunct in primary palatoplasty, reducing VPI and fistula formation.

Reasons for Removal of Rigid Internal Fixation Devices in Craniofacial Surgery: A 20-year Update.

The hardware utilized for rigid internal fixation of the craniofacial skeleton has evolved over time. Thus, the reasons for the unplanned removal of hardware continue to change. The purpose of this study is to compare past (1989-1995) and present (2000-2020) patient cohorts to establish trends related to unplanned removal of craniofacial hardware. A retrospective review study was designed. Data from our institution's original publication describing the unplanned removal of craniofacial hardware (1989-1995) was obtained. Data related to patients who underwent unplanned removal of hardware from 2000 to 2020 was collected from the electronic medical record. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed to compare demographics, reasons for hardware placement, and reasons for unplanned hardware removal between cohorts. This study includes 55 patients treated from 1989 to 1995 and 184 patients treated from 2000 to 2020. The average age at hardware placement decreased from 32 years (1989-1995) to 28 years (2000-2020). The most common reason for hardware placement changed from motor vehicle accident (1989-1995) to congenital deformity (2000-2020). The length of time with hardware in situ increased from 13 months (1989-1995) to 25 months (2000-2020). The most common reason for hardware removal changed from prominent hardware (1989-1995) to hardware exposure (2000-2020). In summary, patients who underwent rigid internal fixation of the craniofacial skeleton from 2000 to 2020 retained their hardware 2 times longer than patients treated from 1989 to 1995. Factors potentially contributing to increased retention include improved surgical technique, decreased profile of hardware, and increased surgeon experience. Further studies are warranted to define preoperative risk factors for unplanned hardware removal.

Institutional Trends in Opioid Prescribing and Utilization after Primary Cleft Lip and Palate Repair.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient prescriptions for postoperative pain play an important role in the opioid epidemic. Prescribing guidelines are an effective target for intervention but require procedure-specific data to be successful. The aim of this study was to examine opioid prescribing patterns and pain control after primary cleft lip and palate repair at a large academic center. METHODS: Children undergoing cleft lip and palate repair from April of 2018 to July of 2019 were included in a prospective cohort study. Data on discharge prescriptions, refills, and emergency room visits were obtained from the medical record. Caregivers were surveyed 7 to 21 days after surgery regarding pain control, opioid use, education exposure, storage, and disposal. Chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance were used to examine predictors of pain control, opioid consumption, safe storage, and disposal. RESULTS: After screening, 59 children were included in the study. Patients were 55.8 percent male with a median age of 12 months (interquartile range, 5 to 15). Ninety percent of patients received an opioid prescription at discharge with a mean quantity of 10 doses (interquartile range, 5 to 15). Ninety-seven percent of caregivers used adjunct medication. Opioids were given for a median of 3 days (interquartile range, 2 to 6.5). Seventy-six percent of caregivers gave less opioid than prescribed. There was no association between pain control and opioid quantity ( p = 0.68). Twenty-four percent of caregivers used locked storage. Thirty-four percent of respondents with leftover medication reported disposal. CONCLUSIONS: Opioids are often overprescribed after cleft lip and palate repair. Providers should consider limiting prescriptions to a 3-day supply to help reduce the quantity of opioids available in the community.

Management of Calcified Cephalohematoma of Infancy: The University of Michigan 25-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: Cephalohematoma of infancy is the result of a subperiosteal blood collection that usually forms during birth-related trauma. A small proportion of cephalohematomas can calcify over time, causing a permanent calvarial deformity that is only correctable with surgery. The authors present a technique for the excision and reconstruction of calcified cephalohematoma and their management experience over the past 25 years. METHODS: All patients with a diagnosis of calcified cephalohematoma between 1994 and 2019 were identified. Patients were included if the diagnosis was confirmed by a pediatric plastic surgeon or a neurosurgeon. All patients underwent surgical evaluation followed by surgical intervention or observation. Patient demographics and potential risk factors for both surgical and nonsurgical groups were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Additional data were collected for the surgical cohort. RESULTS: Of 160 infants diagnosed with cephalohematoma, 72 met inclusion criteria. Thirty patients underwent surgical treatment. There was no significant difference in demographics, baseline characteristics, or potential risk factors between the operative and nonoperative groups. Mean age at the time of surgery was 8.6 months. Twenty-one surgical patients (70 percent) required inlay bone grafting. All surgery patients had improvement in calvarial shape. The main risk of surgery was blood loss requiring transfusion [eight patients (26.7 percent)]. Thirteen percent of patients experienced minor complications. CONCLUSIONS: This series of 72 children with calcified cephalohematomas, 30 of whom required surgical intervention, is one of the largest to date. The technique presented herein demonstrated excellent surgical outcomes by restoring normal cranial contours and was associated with a low complication profile. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Impact of sleep-disordered breathing on behavior and quality of life in children aged 2 to 7 years with non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate.

INTRODUCTION: Children with cleft are at high risk for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). However, little is known about the impact of SDB in this pediatric population. The aim of this study was to investigate whether SDB play a role in behavior and quality of life (QoL) in young children with cleft. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 95 children aged 2.0-7.9 years with cleft palate. Parents completed a sleep (Pediatric Sleep questionnaire), a behavior (Conners' Early Childhood scale), and a generic health-related QoL (KINDL questionnaire) assessment. Symptomatic children were referred for a polysomnography (PSG). RESULTS: Overall, 14.7% of children (49.5% boys) screened positive for SDB and 27.4% had a PSG, which identified 84.6% with sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] ≥1) and 27.2% with AHI ≥5. Positive screening for SDB was associated with elevated T-scores for anxiety and physical symptoms, significant differences in mean T-scores for inattention/hyperactivity (64.2 ± 15.7 vs. 53.9 ± 11.4, p = .02), social functioning/atypical behaviour, social functioning (60.6 ± 11.7 vs. 51.9 ± 7.3, p = .004 and 59.5 ± 10.9 vs. 51.2 ± 8.0, p = .01) and mood (57.5 ± 8.2 vs. 50.7 ± 8.2, p = .03). Lower QoL scores for emotional and family well-being were also reported in children with SDB (80.7 ± 13.4 vs. 90.0 ± 8.7, p = .01, 66.7 ± 15.8 vs. 76.9 ± 11.9, p = .04). Children with AHI ≥5 compared to those with AHI ≥1 and <5 showed significant differences in mean T-score for aggressive behaviour (65.2 ± 12.1 vs. 52.3 ± 11.3, p = .04), defiant temper (62.8 ± 9.2 vs. 51.6 ± 10.2, p = .03) and lower family QoL scores (59.4 ± 15.2 vs. 77.1 ± 9.6, p = .006). CONCLUSIONS: In children with cleft palate the presence of SDB symptoms and moderate/severe sleep apnea was associated with behavioral (internalizing/externalizing) problems and lower family well-being.

Sleep-related movement disorders and growing pains: differences in daytime and bedtime behavior in 2-6 year old children with cleft palate.

BACKGROUND: Behavioural difficulties are common in children with sleep disorders. However, up to now no study has investigated the association between sleep-related movement disorders (SRMD) and behavior in children with craniofacial cleft. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and impact of SRMD and growing pains in daytime/bedtime behavior in young children with cleft palate. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey study of sleep and behavior in 2.0-6.9 year old children with cleft palate. Parents completed the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire, which queries reports of periodic limb movements (PLMS), restless leg syndrome (RLS), growing pains, daytime sleepiness, sleep latency/duration, and the Conners' Early Childhood Questionnaire which asks about behavioral difficulties. RESULTS: Among 71 children with cleft palate (52.1% boys) 14.1 % screened positive for PLMS, 8.5% reported RLS and 9.9% growing pains. Children who screened positive for PLMS and RLS were more likely to report sleepiness (PLMS 40% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.001; RLS 33.3% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.04) and long sleep latency (PLMS 80% vs. 32.8%, p = 0.005; RLS 100% vs. 33.8%, p = 0.002) compared to those who did not endorse the respective sleep problems. Children who reported PLMS had a higher T-score for emotional (58.2 ± 7.6 vs. 50.7 ± 8.4, p = 0.01) and somatic symptoms (66.2 ± 15.2 vs. 49.9 ± 9.5, p = 0.0001). Sleepiness was associated to an increased frequency of externalizing, psychiatric and somatic problems. While children with long sleep latency reported more emotional and somatic symptoms, and those with reduced sleep duration more internalizing difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: Parents of young children with cleft palate reported frequently PLMS, RLS and growing pains. Daytime/bedtime behavior varies depending on the presence of SRMD. Sleepiness and sleep variables might play a role on behavioural problems in children with cleft and SRMD symptoms.

A Simplified Approach to Myelomeningocele Defect Repair.

BACKGROUND: Repair of the soft tissue defect in myelomeningoceles remains challenging. The literature currently lacks a systematic approach, reporting high rates of complications. We present outcomes from the largest series to date and describe a simplified approach that minimizes morbidity and streamlines decision making. METHODS: Patients 1 year or younger who underwent myelomeningocele repair between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed. Flap types were categorized by tissue composition. Complications were dichotomized into early and late (<30 days and >30 days postoperative, respectively). Logistic regression was used to measure the impact of flap tissue composition and skin closure technique on odds of postoperative complications. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Reoperation was required in only 3 (3.0%) patients-1 for wound dehiscence and 2 for surgical site infections. Zero cases of tethered cord or cerebrospinal fluid leak occurred. The most common minor complications were early wound complications (n = 18, 18.6%) and early infection (n = 5, 5.2%). Fascia-only flaps and muscle + other tissue flaps were not associated with higher odds of complications compared with muscle-only flaps (odds ratio [OR], 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-8.50, P = 0.29; OR = 2.87, 95% CI 0.66-12.51, P = 0.16, respectively). Rhomboid flaps for skin closure were associated with higher odds of complications (OR, 4.47; 95% CI, 1.00-19.97; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our approach to myelomeningocele repair demonstrated no cases of secondary tethered cord or cerebrospinal fluid leak, and reoperative rates were extremely low. Because complications were unrelated to flap type, we recommend a simplified approach using any tissue type for dural coverage and 2-layer primary closure of the skin.

Decision Making in Pediatric Plastic Surgery: Autonomy and Shared Approaches.

BACKGROUND: Although shared decision-making is essential to patient-centered healthcare, its role in pediatric plastic surgery remains unclear. The objective of this study was to define the preferred level of involvement in surgical decision-making among children, caregivers, and surgeons. METHODS: The authors surveyed pediatric plastic surgery patients (n = 100) and their caregivers regarding their preferences on child involvement during surgical decision-making. Fleiss' kappa was used to assess agreement between groups. Bivariate Chi-square tests and multinomial logistic regression were used to assess the relationship between decision-making preferences and select demographic factors. RESULTS: Only 34% of children and their caregivers agreed upon their decision-making preferences (k = 0.04). The majority of children (40%) and caregivers (67%) favored shared decision-making between the patient, caregiver, and surgeon. Only 16% of children preferred physician-driven decisions, while 20% of children desired complete autonomy. Children's preferences were significantly associated with their age; the relative risk of children deferring to caregivers or surgeons over a shared approach was lower for adolescents and teens compared to children under 10 years old (relative risk = 0.20; 95% confidence interval: 0.054-0.751; P = 0.02). Caregiver's preferences did not change based on the child's age, but rather were related to the child's gender. Caregivers were more likely to choose the option that gave the child more autonomy when the child was male. CONCLUSIONS: While most caregivers preferred a shared approach to decision-making, children desired greater autonomy, particularly with increasing age. Since there was limited agreement between caregivers and children, surgeons must be cognizant of differing preferences when discussing treatment plans to optimize both patient and parent satisfaction.

Complications and the Need for Long-Term Follow-Up after Secondary Speech Surgery: A National and Longitudinal Claims Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although most patients attain normal speech after cleft palate repair, up to 20 percent require secondary speech surgery. Despite the frequency of these procedures, complications and rates of subsequent revisions of secondary speech surgery after all procedure types have never been reviewed using national, longitudinal data. METHODS: The authors examined insurance claims from Clinformatics Data Mart between 2001 and 2017. Cases were categorized as palatalprocedures (i.e., palatoplasty, revision palatoplasty, secondary lengthening, palatal island flap) or pharyngeal procedures (i.e., pharyngeal flap, dynamic sphincter pharyngoplasty) (n = 846). Continuous enrollment from 180 days before to 30 days after surgery was required. Patients were excluded if they underwent palatoplasty, or any surgery at less than 3 years of age, without a speech diagnosis. Outcomes included 30-day complications and rates of subsequent revision secondary speech surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between procedure type and complications. RESULTS: In this cohort, 52.5 percent underwent pharyngeal procedures, and 47.5 percent underwent palatal procedures. Complications occurred in 10.9 percent of patients and included respiratory complications (4.0 percent), bleeding (1.2 percent), dehiscence (3.6 percent), and critical care episodes (3.0 percent). There was no difference in complications between procedure types (OR, 0.87; 95 percent CI, 0.56 to 1.37; p = 0.56). The subsequent revision rate was 12.7 percent, but was 21.7 percent in patients with 3 years of postoperative enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Although complication rates were comparable to those in recent literature, rates of subsequent revisions of secondary speech procedures were high in patients with longer postoperative enrollment. Thus, these patients merit prolonged follow-up, as velopharyngeal dysfunction may recur over time. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Endovascular Treatment of Arteriovenous Malformations of the Head and Neck: Focus on the Yakes Classification and Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate endovascular treatment of head and neck arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) based on the Yakes AVM classification and correlate treatment approach with clinical and angiographic outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was performed in patients who underwent endovascular treatment of head and neck AVMs between January 2005 and December 2017. Clinical and operative records, imaging, and postoperative courses of patients were reviewed. Clinical stage was determined according to the Schobinger classification. AVM architecture and treatment approaches were determined according to the Yakes classification. Primary outcomes were clinical and angiographic treatment success rates and complication rates, with analysis according to the Yakes classification. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (15 females) were identified, with a mean age of 30.6 years. Downgrading of the Schobinger clinical classification was achieved in all patients. Lesions included 8 Yakes type IIa, 5 type IIb, 1 type IIIa and IIIb, and 14 type IV. Lesions were treated using an intra-arterial, nidal, or transvenous approach, using ethanol and liquid embolic agents. Arteriovenous shunt eradication of >90% was achieved in 22 of 28 patients (79%), including 9 of 13 (69%) of Yakes type IV lesions and 13 of 15 (87%) of the other types. There were 5 significant complications in 79 procedures (6%), including 4 of 50 (8%) in Yakes type IV lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Schobinger stage was downgraded in all patients. Arteriovenous shunt eradication of >90% was achieved in most patients. Yakes type IV lesions required more sessions, and shunt eradication was higher in the Yakes II and III groups.

Saving Face: Patient Strategies to Reduce Stigma and Barriers to Effective Decision-Making Among Children With Cleft Lip.

Facial differences associated with cleft lips are often stigmatizing and can negatively impact psychosocial development and quality of life. However, little is known regarding patients' responses to societal expectations of appearance, or how these responses may impact utilization of revision surgery. Thus, patients with cleft lips at least 8 years of age (n = 31) were purposively sampled for semi-structured interviews. After verbatim transcription, first cycle coding proceeded with a semantic approach, which revealed patterns that warranted second cycle coding. The authors utilized an eclectic coding design to capture deeper meanings in thematic analysis. Additionally, survey data from a separate study were examined to evaluate participants' interest in improving appearance. Three major themes emerged, all of which reflected a desire to "save face" when interacting with society: (1) Cultural Mantras, which included societal mottos that minimized the importance of appearance; (2) Toughening Up, wherein the participants downplayed the difficulty of having a cleft; and (3) Deflection, wherein the participants took pride in facial features unrelated to their clefts. Despite these efforts to "save face," 78% of participants expressed interest in improving their appearance in the separate survey data.In conclusion, children with cleft lips try to "save face" when interacting with society by depreciating appearance, making light of clefts, and focusing on non-cleft related features. Paradoxically, many desired improvements of their appearance in an earlier survey. Awareness of these coping strategies is critical, as they may negatively impact surgeon-patient communication and inhibit patients from expressing interest in revision surgery.

Decision-Making in Cleft-Related Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Patients and Caregivers.

OBJECTIVE: Preference-sensitive surgical decisions merit shared decision-making, as decision engagement can reduce decisional conflict and regret. Elective cleft-related procedures are often preference sensitive, and therefore, we sought to better understand decision-making in this population. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews were conducted to elicit qualitative data. A hierarchical codebook was developed through an iterative process in preparation for thematic analysis. Thematic analysis was performed to examine differences between patients and caregivers. SETTING: Multidisciplinary cleft clinic at a tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with cleft lip aged 8 and older (n = 31) and their caregivers (n = 31) were purposively sampled. Inability to converse in English, intellectual disability, or syndromic diagnoses resulted in exclusion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preferences surrounding surgical decision-making identified during thematic analysis. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 12.7 (standard deviation: 3.1). Most had unilateral cleft lip and palate (43.8%). Three themes emerged: Insufficient Understanding of Facial Difference and Treatment, Diversity of Surgical Indications, and Barriers to Patient Autonomy. Almost half of caregivers believed their children understood their clefts, but most of these children failed to provide information about their cleft. Although many patients and caregivers acknowledged that surgery addressed function and/or appearance, patients and caregivers exhibited differences regarding the necessity of surgery. Furthermore, a large proportion of patients believed their opinions mattered in decisions, but less than half of caregivers agreed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with clefts desire to participate in surgical decisions but have limited understanding of their facial difference and surgical indications. Cleft surgeons must educate patients and facilitate shared decision-making.

Variation in the Desire for Cleft Revision Surgery among Children, Caregivers, and Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Although revision surgery is part of the reconstructive process for children with cleft lip and/or cleft palate, the indications for revision vary, and the extent to which surgeons and families agree on appearance is unclear. The authors sought to understand the extent to which children with cleft lip and/or cleft palate, surgeons, caregivers, and control observers agree on satisfaction with appearance and the desire for revision. METHODS: Children with cleft lip and/or cleft palate (n = 100) and their caregivers (n = 100) were surveyed regarding satisfaction with appearance using the Cleft Evaluation Profile. Surgeons (n = 10) and control observers (n = 10) rated photographs of these children using questions analogous to the Cleft Evaluation Profile. General linear model repeated measures analysis of variance were used to detect significant differences between raters, with an alpha of 0.05. RESULTS: The children reported greater satisfaction with appearance across all domains compared with surgeons (nose, 7.77 versus 5.51, p < 0.001; lip, 7.94 versus 5.90, p < 0.001; maxilla, 8.16 versus 6.56, p < 0.001) and general observers (nose, 7.78 versus 6.00, p < 0.001; lip, 7.80 versus 6.12, p < 0.001; maxilla, 8.16 versus 7.40, p < 0.001). Children and caregivers expressed similar degrees of satisfaction with appearance of the lip (5.48 ± 1.69 versus 5.6 ± 1.49, p > 0.5) and maxilla (6.08 ± 1.1 versus 5.8 ± 1.2, p = 0.07). There was no significant relationship between children and surgeons in terms of the desire for revision surgery (p = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: All groups expressed differing levels of satisfaction with cleft-specific aspects of appearance. Importantly, children were more satisfied than all other groups. Care must be taken to evaluate perceptions of all stakeholders before moving forward with cleft revision surgery.

Establishing Validity Evidence for an Operative Performance Rating System for Plastic Surgery Residents.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe an operative performance rating system for plastic surgery residents and provide validity evidence for the instrument. METHODS: Three plastic surgery residents (PGY levels 1, 5, and 6) from Southern Illinois University School of Medicine (SIUSOM) performed a carpal tunnel release with audio video recording. The 3 videos were reviewed by 8 expert hand surgeons and 3 SIUSOM faculty using the operative performance rating system instrument to assess resident operative performance. Validity evidence including content, internal structure, and relationship to other variables was collected. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was consistently fair to moderate (weighted Cohen's Kappa 0.44-0.84 for experts, 0.24-0.55 for SIUSOM raters), and all assessment items were highly correlated (Cronbach's alpha of 0.9867). Local SIUSOM faculty routinely demonstrated higher overall scores for PGY 1 and PGY 6 residents compared to expert raters. CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by small numbers, this pilot study suggests that potential bias based upon PGY year, identity, and performance history may exist and independent assessment by unbiased raters or comparison to national operative norms may be valuable. Our study provides baseline validity evidence for a resident operative performance assessment tool that can be integrated into practice in plastic surgery training programs.

Caregiver-Reported Outcomes and Barriers to Care among Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.

BACKGROUND: For children with cleft lip and/or palate, access to care is vital for optimizing speech, appearance, and psychosocial outcomes. The authors posited that inadequate access to care negatively impacts outcomes in this population. METHODS: Sixty caregivers of children with cleft lip and palate were surveyed to assess perceived barriers using the validated Barriers to Care questionnaire. The questionnaire includes 39 items divided into five subscales, with higher scores indicating fewer barriers. Caregiver-reported outcomes were assessed using the Cleft Evaluation Profile, which captures cleft-specific appearance- and speech-related outcomes. Higher scores correspond to less satisfactory outcomes. Desire for revision surgery was assessed as a binary outcome among caregivers. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the relationship of barriers to care, caregiver-reported outcomes, and desire for revision, adjusting for clinical and demographic covariates. RESULTS: Sixty percent of caregivers perceived barriers to care, and caregivers who reported poorer access to care described poorer cleft-related outcomes (r = 0.19, p = 0.024). Caregivers with poorer skills (r = 0.17, p = 0.037), expectations (r = 0.17, p = 0.045), and pragmatics (r = 0.18, p = 0.026) subscale scores were associated with worse Cleft Evaluation Profile scores. Barriers were also negatively associated with aesthetic item scores (r = 0.11, p = 0.025). Finally, caregivers reporting fewer barriers were 21.2 percent less likely to express interest in revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to care were associated with poorer appearance-related outcomes and increased interest in revision among caregivers of cleft patients. Enhancing access to care is critical in order to effectively meet goals of care for these families.

Optimal Timing of Alveolar Cleft Bone Grafting for Maxillary Clefts in the Cleft Palate Population.

PURPOSE: Timing of bone grafting for maxillary alveolar clefts is not standardized. Secondary bone grafting is often performed; however, consensus does not exist regarding use of chronologic versus dental age to guide treatment. Several authors suggest an early chronologic age is associated with greater success. Available literature was systematically reviewed for evidence for optimal timing for grafting maxillary alveolar clefts. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Registrar of Controlled Trials databases were queried for manuscripts pertaining to maxillary alveolar cleft bone grafting. Inclusion criteria included manuscripts with level of evidence 4 or greater. Studies not using bone graft, lacking postoperative follow up, and clinical reports were excluded. Seventeen articles met criteria. RESULTS: Nine manuscripts recommended grafting based on dental age prior to eruption of the permanent canines, while 8 recommended grafting between ages 7 to 12. The most commonly reported complication was wound dehiscence, followed by graft-site infection. Ten studies used perioperative treatment protocols, 8 of which included preoperative and/or postoperative orthodontia for maxillary expansion. Correlation between chronologic age and success was not significant, but trended towards greater success with increasing age. CONCLUSION: Success of secondary grafting is high, but significant variability exists in the timing of grafting. Evidence is lacking to support specific chronologic age; rather, perioperative protocols, systematic surgical technique, and a multidisciplinary discussion are likely more substantial in achieving success, and may be confounders in studies where an early age at grafting appears associated with success. The timing of bone grafting for maxillary alveolar clefts would benefit from a prospective randomized study.

What about Learners' Roles in the Operating Room Should Be Disclosed to Patients?

This case commentary primarily focuses on properly disclosing the participation of medical trainees when obtaining informed consent in the educational health care environment, particularly in relation to the development of institutional standardization of informed consent processes. The article addresses what it means to obtain informed consent, the elements thereof, and how ethical principles can be better applied to clinical practice in order to ensure truly informed consent. Concepts of capacity, disclosure of information, patient understanding, voluntary decision making, and consent are discussed as they relate to the case.

Factors Influencing American Plastic Surgery Residents Toward an Academic Career.

BACKGROUND: Plastic surgery residency program directors have an interest in recruiting applicants who show an interest in an academic practice. Medical school achievements (ie, United States Medical Licensing Examination® scores, publications, and Alpha Omega Alpha status) are metrics assessed to grade applicants but may not correlate with ultimately choosing an academic career. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate factors influencing residents' choices for or against academic careers. METHODS: A 25-item online questionnaire was designed to measure baseline interest in academic plastic surgery and factors that influence decisions to continue on or abandon that career path. This questionnaire was disseminated to the integrated/combined plastic surgery residents during the 2013 to 2014 academic year. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five respondents indicated that they were currently interested in pursuing academic practice (n = 78) or had lost interest in academic practice (n = 47). Among all respondents, 92.8% (n = 116) stated they were interested in academic careers at the time of residency application, but one-third (n = 41) subsequently lost interest. Those residents who retained interest in academic careers indicated resident/medical student educational opportunities (57%) and complexity of patients (52%) as reasons. Those who lost interest cited a lack of autonomy (43%), publishing requirements (32%), and income discrepancy (26%) as reasons. DISCUSSION: Many residents report losing interest in academics during residency. Traditional metrics valued in the recruitment process may not serve as positive predictors of an academic career path. CONCLUSION: Reasons why residents lose interest are not easily correctable, but mentorship, adequate career counseling, and research opportunities during training remain factors that can be addressed across all residency programs.

HISTORIQUE: Les directeurs des programmes de résidence en chirurgie plastique ont intérêt à recruter des candidats qui souhaitent mener une carrière en milieu universitaire. Les réalisations en faculté de médecine (indices de l'USMLE, publications et statut à l'AOA) sont des mesures utilisées pour classer les candidats, mais elles ne sont peut-être pas corrélées avec le choix d'une carrière en milieu universitaire. OBJECTIF: La présente étude visait à évaluer les facteurs qui influent sur les choix des résidents à opter ou non pour une carrière en milieu universitaire. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les chercheurs ont conçu un questionnaire en ligne de 25 questions pour mesurer l'intérêt de départ envers une carrière en chirurgie plastique en milieu universitaire et les facteurs qui influent sur la décision de poursuivre en ce sens ou non. Ils l'ont distribué aux résidents en chirurgie plastique intégrés ou combinés pendant l'année scolaire 2013-2014. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 125 répondants ont affirmé s'intéresser à une carrière en milieu universitaire (n = 78) ou avoir perdu leur intérêt envers la pratique universitaire (n = 47). Dans l'ensemble, 92.8 % d'entre eux (n = 116) ont affirmé qu'ils envisageaient de mener une carrière en milieu universitaire au moment de leur demande de résidence, mais le tiers (n = 41) a ensuite perdu cet intérêt. Parmi leurs raisons, les résidents qui continuaient de vouloir mener une carrière en milieu universitaire ont cité les possibilités d'enseignement aux résidents et aux étudiants en médecine (57 %) et la complexité des cas (52 %). Ceux qui avaient perdu l'intérêt ont invoqué le manque d'autonomie (43 %), les exigences en matière de publication (32 %) et l'écart du revenu (26 %). EXPOSÉ: De nombreux résidents ont déclaré perdre leur intérêt envers une carrière en milieu universitaire pendant leur résidence. Les mesures habituelles utilisées pendant le processus de recrutement ne sont peut-être pas des prédicteurs positifs d'un cheminement de carrière universitaire. CONCLUSION: Les raisons pour lesquelles les résidents perdent l'intérêt envers la carrière en milieu universitaire ne sont pas faciles à corriger, mais le mentorat, une bonne orientation de carrière et des occasions de recherche pendant la formation font partie des facteurs qui peuvent être abordés dans tous les programmes de résidence.

Timing of Furlow Palatoplasty for Patients With Submucous Cleft Palate.

BACKGROUND: Submucous cleft palate (SMCP) is the most common form of cleft involving the posterior palate, resulting in variable degrees of velar dysfunction and speech disturbance. Although early surgical intervention is indicated for patients with true cleft palate, the indications for palatoplasty and timing of surgical intervention for patients with SMCP remain controversial. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with SMCP were retrospectively reviewed. Patients treated with Furlow palatoplasty were dichotomized based on patient age at the time of surgical correction into early speech development and late speech development. Primary outcome measures included standardized assessments of hypernasal resonance and quantitative pre- and postoperative nasometry scores. Patients managed nonoperatively were included for comparison of early and late speech outcomes. RESULTS: Both early and late groups demonstrated improvement in qualitative assessment of hypernasal resonance following Furlow palatoplasty. Early and late groups also had significant improvement in pre- to postoperative nasometry scores from 7.4 to 2.3 SD from norm ( P = .01) and 6.0 to 3.6 SD from norm ( P = .02), respectively. There was no difference in postoperative nasometry scores between early and late groups, 2.3 and 3.6 SD ( P = .12). CONCLUSION: Furlow palatoplasty significantly improves the degree of hypernasality in patients with SMCP based on pre- and postoperative nasometry scores and on qualitative assessment of hypernasality. There were no differences in speech outcomes based on early compared with late operative intervention. Therefore, early palatal repair is not obligatory for optimal speech outcomes in children with SMCP and palatoplasty should be deferred until the emergence of overt velopharyngeal insufficiency.