Adherence to contact precautions by different types of healthcare workers through video monitoring in a tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND: Contact precautions are required to prevent transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms; however, reports on adherence rates vary. This study used video monitoring to evaluate adherence to the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) by different types of healthcare workers. METHODS: This observational study was conducted in a 781-bed tertiary hospital from July 2016 to March 2017. Cameras were installed in areas where staff don PPE. Infection control teams observed the videos and assessed adherence rates. RESULTS: In total, 1097 opportunities for donning PPE were observed. Most staff observed were nurses and nursing assistants (Ns/Nsas) (880/1097, 80.2%). Overall, the adherence rate to appropriate PPE use was 34.0%. The adherence rate among Ns/Nsas was lower (239/858, 27.9%) compared with infectious disease doctors (18/18, 100%) and cleaning staff (42/49, 85.7%). The adherence rate for PPE use for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) with toxin detection was significantly higher than that for CDI without toxin detection and multi-drug-resistant organisms (P<0.001 for both). The adherence rate for patients with an independent functional status was higher than that for patients with a dependent functional status (P=0.018). The adherence rate was lower in the intensive care unit (ICU) than in non-ICU wards (27.6% vs 36.5%; P=0.006). CONCLUSION: Video monitoring is a useful tool for monitoring adherence to PPE use, facilitating observation of more PPE opportunities than direct observation. Adherence to contact precautions varied by occupation; however, overall adherence was insufficient. The lower adherence rate in nurses might be due to more frequent care visits.

Impact of prompt intervention in response to positive blood culture results during weekends by collaboration between infectious disease specialists and microbiology laboratory staff.

The purpose of this investigation was to elucidate the impact of prompt intervention for patients whose blood culture results became positive during weekends, as this is not standard care in some countries. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary referral hospital. From June 2015, results of positive blood cultures became available during weekends. If infectious disease specialists identified cases of bacteremia on suboptimal antimicrobial coverage, they contacted the primary team for modification of antibiotic treatment. We reviewed patients whose blood culture results became positive during weekends, comparing the pre-intervention (September 2014 to May 2015) and post-intervention (June 2015 to February 2016) periods. In total, 1081 (post-intervention 568 [52.5%]) bacteremia episodes were included (median patient age [interquartile range, IQR]: 72 [60-82] years; men: 625 [57.8%]). During the post-intervention period, 187 (32.9%) bacteremia episodes were detected during weekends. Infectious disease specialists evaluated the positive blood culture results 1, 2, and ≥3 days prior in 77 (13.6%), 88 (15.5%), and 22 (3.9%) cases, respectively. Although the 7- and 30-day mortality did not significantly improve after the intervention, the length of hospital stay (LOS) in the hospital-acquired bacteremia group was significantly reduced during the post-intervention period after controlling for confounders (post- vs. pre-intervention: median days [IQR]: 37 [19-63] vs. 46.5 [24.8-86.3], p = 0.030). Blood culture results became positive during weekends in one-third of bacteremia cases. The LOS was shortened after the intervention in the hospital-acquired bacteremia group. This could be an important antimicrobial stewardship target.