Continuous Skill Training Using the Disease-Specific Endoscopic Surgical Simulator to Promote Young Pediatric Surgeons: Learning Curve for Trainees.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the learning effects of continuous training with a disease-specific endoscopic surgical simulator for young pediatric surgeons. Materials and Methods: Participants trained with a laparoscopic fundoplication simulator for 1 hour every 10 days. At the start of each training session, we assessed the participant's surgical technique using the surgical skill evaluation system, which evaluates the following items: (1) task time, (2) right-left balance of suturing, (3) suture spacing between the three ligatures, (4) total path length traveled by forceps, (5) velocity of the forceps tips, (6) length of the wrap, (7) number of ligature failures, and (8) comparison of improvements according to assessment point. We examined the learning effects of this continuous training program. Results: Task time, right-left balance of suturing, and sum of the distance traveled by each forceps showed significant progressive improvements (P < .05). Suture spacing and average velocity of forceps tips did not change significantly with training (P = .5781, P = .0781, respectively). However, the ratio of traveled distance between left and right forceps significantly improved (P < .05). There was a significant trend for the wrap length to approach the target value (P < .05). According to the linear mixed-effects model, the number of training sessions required for learning was not uniform and varied depending on the skill. Conclusion: This simulator training program can help pediatric surgeons to acquire surgical skills easily, economically, and safely. In the future, we need to evaluate how surgical skills acquired during this continuous training are reflected in clinical operations.

A new innovative laparoscopic fundoplication training simulator with a surgical skill validation system.

PURPOSE: We developed and validated a specific laparoscopic fundoplication simulator for use with the objective endoscopic surgical skills evaluation system. The aim of this study was to verify the quality of skills of surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a 1-year-old infant body model based on computed tomography data and reproduced pneumoperitoneum model based on the clinical situation. The examinees were divided into three groups: fifteen pediatric surgery experts (PSE), twenty-four pediatric surgery trainees (PSN), and ten general surgeons (GS). They each had to perform three sutures ligatures for construction of Nissen wrap. Evaluate points are time for task, the symmetry of the placement of the sutures, and the uniformity of the interval of suture ligatures in making wrap. And the total path length and velocity of forceps were measured to assess bi-hand coordination. RESULTS: PSE were significantly superior to PSN regarding total time spent (p < 0.01) and total path length (p < 0.01). GS used both forceps faster than the other groups, and PSN used the right forceps faster than the left forceps (p < 0.05). PSE were shorter with regard to the total path length than GS (p < 0.01). PSE showed most excellent results in the symmetry of the wrap among three groups. CONCLUSION: Our new model was used useful to validate the characteristics between GS and pediatric surgeon. Both PSE and GS have excellent bi-hand coordination and can manipulate both forceps equally and had superior skills compared to PSN. In addition, PSE performed most compact and accurate skills in the conflicted operative space.

Preoperative simulation regarding the appropriate port location for laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy: a randomized study using a disease-specific training simulator.

PURPOSE: We verified the appropriate port location for laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy using a comprehensive laparoscopic training simulator. METHODS: We developed a hepaticojejunostomy model, consist of common hepatic duct and intestine and participants required to place two sutures precisely using two different port locations (A: standard port location, B: modified port location). The order of tasks was randomly determined using the permuted block method (Group I: Task A â†’ Task B, Group II: Task B â†’ Task A). The time for task completion and total number of errors were recorded. In addition, we evaluated the spatial paths and velocity of both forceps. Statistical analyses were performed using a statistical software program. RESULTS: The time for the task, the total error score, and the spatial paths and velocity of both forceps were not significantly different between groups I and II. Furthermore, the port location and order of tasks (group I or group II) did not significantly affect the results. In contrast, there were significant differences in the performance between experts and novices, who were classified as such based on the total number of experienced endoscopic surgeries. CONCLUSION: Preoperative port simulation in advanced surgery using our artificial simulator is feasible and may facilitate minimally invasive surgery for children.

An Endoscopic Surgical Skill Validation System for Pediatric Surgeons Using a Model of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair.

PURPOSE: We developed a system to objectively verify the endoscopic surgical skills of pediatric surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a thoracoscopic model of congenital diaphragmatic hernia mimicking a newborn's size. The examinees were divided into Experts (n = 10) and Trainees (n = 19), and each group performed two tasks (Task 1, reduction of a herniated intestine from the thoracic space to the abdomen; Task 2, perform three suture ligatures of a diaphragm defect using intracorporeal knot-tying). The end points were the time required to complete Task 1, time score calculated using the residual time from the time limit for Task 2, number of complete full-thickness sutures, maximum air-pressure tolerance, degree of diaphragm deformation, and the residual defect areas after suturing. We also evaluated the total path length and velocity of the forceps tips using a three-dimensional position measurement instrument. RESULTS: The Experts had significantly superior results for the time for Task 1, time score, number of complete full-thickness sutures, maximum air-pressure tolerance, and degree of diaphragm deformation in Task 2 (all P < .05). We found that the total path length and average velocities for the left forceps were inferior to those of the right forceps in both tasks in the Trainees (both P < .05, respectively), whereas the Expert group showed no significant laterality in these tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Our model could validate the quality of endoscopic surgical skills and could differentiate between Expert and Trainee pediatric surgeons. The Experts could use their forceps equally well to perform tasks even in a small working space.

Effectiveness of short-term endoscopic surgical skill training for young pediatric surgeons: a validation study using the laparoscopic fundoplication simulator.

PURPOSE: Pediatric surgeons require highly advanced skills when performing endoscopic surgery; however, their experience is often limited in comparison to general surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of endoscopic surgery training for less-experienced pediatric surgeons and then compare their skills before and after training. METHODS: Young pediatric surgeons (n = 7) who participated in this study underwent a 2-day endoscopic skill training program, consisting of lectures, box training and live tissue training. The trainees performed the Nissen construction tasks before and after training using our objective evaluation system. A statistical analysis was conducted using the two-tailed paired Student's t tests. RESULTS: The time for task was 984 ± 220 s before training and 645 ± 92.8 s after training (p < 0.05). The total path length of both forceps was 37855 ± 10586 mm before training and 22582 ± 3045 mm after training (p < 0.05). The average velocity of both forceps was 26.1 ± 3.68 mm/s before training and 22.9 ± 2.47 mm/sec after training (p < 0.1). The right and left balance of suturing was improved after training (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Pediatric surgery trainees improved their surgical skills after receiving short-term training. We demonstrated the effectiveness of our training program, which utilized a new laparoscopic fundoplication simulator.

Objective assessment of the suture ligature method for the laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis model using a new computerized system.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop a new objective assessment system for the suture ligature method employed in the laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis model. Suturing skills were evaluated objectively using this system. METHODS: This study compared 17 expert surgeons, each of whom had performed >500 laparoscopic procedures, with 36 novice surgeons, each of whom had performed <15 laparoscopic procedures. Each examinee performed a specific skill assessment task using an artificial model that mimics living tissue, which is linked with the Suture Simulator Instruction Evaluation Unit. The model used internal air pressure measurements and image processing to evaluate suturing skills. Five criteria were used to evaluate the skills of participants. RESULTS: The volumes of air pressure leak in the expert and novice groups were 21.13 ± 6.68 and 8.51 ± 8.60 kPa, respectively. The numbers of full-thickness sutures in the expert and novice groups were 2.94 ± 0.24 pairs and 2.47 ± 0.77 pairs, respectively. Suture tensions in the expert and novice groups were 60.99 ± 11.81 and 80.90 ± 16.63 %, respectively. The areas of wound-opening in the expert and novice groups were 1.76 ± 2.17 and 11.06 ± 15.37 mm(2), respectively. The performance times in the expert and novice groups were 349 ± 120 and 750 ± 269 s, respectively. Significant differences between the expert and novice groups for each criterion were observed. The acceptable range of values for each criterion except for the number of full-thickness sutures was statistically defined by the performance of the expert group. CONCLUSIONS: Our system is useful for the quantitative assessment of suturing skill in laparoscopic surgery. We believe that this system is a useful tool for training and assessment of laparoscopic surgeons.