RESUMO
Vaccines that elicit mucosal immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 could potentially be of exceptional importance in providing first line defense at the site of viral entry. The serological antibody response induced by SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have already been well characterized. In order to understand the mucosal immune response profiles of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, we examined both the mucosal and systemic responses of subjects vaccinated by two different vaccination platforms: mRNA (Comirnaty) and inactivated virus (CoronaVac). Serial nasal epithelial lining fluid (NELF) and peripheral blood samples were collected in ten subjects who had received CoronaVac and thirty-two subjects who had received Comirnaty. We quantified IgA and IgG specific to SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein by ELISA in NELF and plasma samples. The neutralization effect of these two sample types were evaluated by surrogate ACE-SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein ELISA. Only Comirnaty induced nasal SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein-specific (S1-specific) IgA and IgG responses, which were evident as early as on 14{+/-}2 days after the first dose. The NELF samples of 72% of subjects became IgA+IgG+, while in 62.5% of subjects the samples were neutralizing by 7{+/-}2 days after the second dose. In 45% of the subjects their NELF remained neutralizing 50 days after the booster of Comirnaty. In plasma, 91% and 100% Comirnaty subjects possessed S1-specific IgA+IgG+ on 14{+/-}2 days after the first dose and 7{+/-}2 days after booster, respectively. The plasma collected on 7{+/-}2 days after booster was 100% neutralizing. The induction of S1-specific antibody by CoronaVac was IgG dominant, and 70% of the subjects possessed S1-specific IgG by 7{+/-}2 days after booster and were all neutralizing. This study reveals that Comirnaty is able to induce S1-specific IgA and IgG response with neutralizing activity in the nasal mucosa in addition to a consistent systemic response. The clinical implications and the biological mechanism of an additional nasal immune response induced by vaccines such as Comirnaty warrant further investigation. One Sentence SummarymRNA vaccine (CoronaVac) elicits mucosal IgA and IgG in the nasal epithelial lining fluid together with ELISA-detected anti-wild-type spike neutralizing antibodies as early as day 14 post vaccination.
RESUMO
BackgroundDeep throat saliva (DTS) and pooled nasopharyngeal swab and throat swab (NPSTS) are utilized for viral detection. DTS is challenging for children. Swabbing the respiratory mucosa requires trained personnel and may trigger sneezing and coughing, which generate droplets. A reliable, simple and safe sampling method applicable to a wide age range is required for community-based surveillance. MethodsWe introduced nasal strip as an easy and low-risk collection method. Asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected patients (n = 38) were recruited. Nasal epithelial lining fluid (NELF) (n = 43) strip paired with nasal swab (n = 13) were collected by a healthcare worker to compare with NPSTS (n = 21) or DTS (n =22) collected within 24 hours as reference. All samples were subjected to viral RNA quantitation by real-time PCR targeting the nucleoprotein gene. ResultsComparable Ct values were observed between paired nasal strip and nasal swab samples. The agreement between nasal strip samples and NPSTS was 94.44% and 100% for NPSTS positive and negative samples. Higher viral RNA concentration was detected in nasal strips than DTS samples. False-negative results were recorded in six DTS specimens, of which four were from children. Storage at room temperature up to 72 (n = 3) hours did not affect diagnostic yield of nasal strips. ConclusionsNasal strip is a reliable and non-invasive sampling method for SARS-CoV-2 detection, and viral detection remains stable for at least 72 hours. It can be used as an alternative tool for community-based surveillance.
