Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care ; 9(1): 30-38, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31657616

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The European Society of Cardiology's 0/1-hour algorithm improves the early triage of patients towards "rule-out" or "rule-in" of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The HEART score is a risk stratification tool for patients with undifferentiated chest pain. We sought to evaluate the performance of the European Society of Cardiology 0/1-hour algorithm and the HEART score to evaluate chest pain patients in the emergency department. METHODS: In this prospective study, we applied the European Society of Cardiology 0/1-hour algorithm and the HEART score in 1355 consecutive patients who presented to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation. Patients were followed for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions and major adverse cardiac events at 30 days: death, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or unplanned coronary revascularization. RESULTS: The European Society of Cardiology 0/1-hour algorithm classified 921 (68.0%) patients as "rule-out" and the HEART score classified 686 (50.6%) patients as "low-risk". The 30-day incidence of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions was 0.32% in the European Society of Cardiology 0/1-hour algorithm "rule-out" patients versus 0.29% in the HEART score "low-risk" patients (p=0.75). The rate of major adverse cardiac events was 7.7% in the European Society of Cardiology 0/1-hour algorithm "rule-out" patients versus 1.1% in the HEART score "low-risk" patients (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The European Society of Cardiology 0/1-hour algorithm identified more patients with low risk of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions at 30 days whereas for major adverse cardiac events, the HEART score had a greater capacity to detect low-risk patients.


Assuntos
Cardiologia/organização & administração , Dor no Peito/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Eletrocardiografia/métodos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/sangue , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/fisiopatologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Medição de Risco , Triagem/métodos , Troponina/sangue
2.
Rev. argent. cardiol ; 87(3): 197-202, mayo 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1057342

RESUMO

RESUMEN Introducción: La Sociedad Europea de Cardiología recomienda para la evaluación del dolor torácico un algoritmo con medición seriada de dos troponinas de alta sensibilidad separadas por una hora. Sin embargo, la alta eficacia y seguridad solo se han estimado según supuestos basados en modelos teóricos. Probamos por primera vez su desempeño en nuestro medio cuando se integra en la rutina diaria. Métodos: Estudio prospectivo unicéntrico que incluyó a pacientes no seleccionados que presentaban sospecha de infarto sin elevación del ST en el servicio de emergencias, a los que se les practicó el algoritmo SEC 0/1h utilizando troponina T de alta sensiblidad. Se evaluó el comportamiento en términos de incidencia a 30 días de los eventos de infarto agudo de miocardio, muerte cardiovascular y el combinado de infarto agudo de miocardio, muerte o revascularización coronaria. Resultados: Se incluyeron 1351 pacientes con una edad media de 61 ± 14 años, 12,4% de diabéticos y 35,8% de evento coronario previo. La tasa de infarto agudo de miocardio fue del 11% con una mortalidad del 0,29%. De acuerdo con la aplicación del algoritmo, 917 pacientes fueron catalogados como "externar" (67%); 270, como "observar" (20%); y 164, como "internar" (13%). La tasa del evento infarto agudo de miocardio resultó del 0,3% en "externar"; del 7%, en "observar"; y del 77,4%, en "internar" (p < 0,001). Por su lado, la muerte o revascularización coronaria resultó de 7,7% en "externar"; del 17,7%, en "observar"; y del 80,4%, en "internar" (p < 0,001). Conclusiones: El algoritmo de 1 hora presentó una buena capacidad para estratificar a pacientes que consultan con sospecha de infarto agudo de miocardio con un gran valor predictivo negativo para excluir el evento de infarto a los 30 días, aunque dicho valor disminuye cuando el evento considerado es la necesidad de revascularización coronaria.


ABSTRACT Background: The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommends an algorithm for the evaluation of chest pain with serial measurement of two high sensitivity troponins separated by one hour. However, the high efficacy and safety of the algorithm has only been estimated according to assumptions based on theoretical models. We tested for the first time its performance in the real world by incorporating it into the daily routine of our center. Methods: This is a prospective, single center study using the ESC 0/1h algorithm with high sensitivity troponin T on unselected patients who presented at the emergency department with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Efficacy and safety were assessed in terms of the 30-day incidence of acute myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death and the composite of acute myocardial infarction, death or coronary revascularization. Results: A total of 1,351 patients were included in the study. Mean age was 61±14 years, 12.4% were diabetics and 35.8% had previous history of coronary events. The rate of acute myocardial infarction was 11% and the rate of mortality 0.29%. According to the application of the algorithm, 917 patients were catalogued as "rule out" (67%), 270 as "observe" (20%) and 164 as "rule in" (13%). The rate of acute myocardial infarction was 0.3% in "rule out", 7% in "observe" and 77.4% in "rule in" (p <0.001). Moreover, death or coronary revascularization was 7.7% in "rule out", 17.7% in "observe" and 80.4% in "rule in" (p <0.001). Conclusions: The 1-hour algorithm showed a good capacity to stratify patients presenting with suspicion of acute myocardial infarction and a high negative predictive value to exclude infarction at 30 days, although this capacity decreases when the event considered is the need for coronary revascularization.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...