Safety and Effectiveness of Liv.52 DS in Patients With Varied Hepatic Disorders: An Open-Label, Multi-centre, Phase IV Study.

Background The hepatoprotective function of polyherbal formulation Liv.52 in chronic liver diseases is well recognized in published literature. The objective of this open-label, phase IV study was to further strengthen and validate its safety and effectiveness using a large patient pool in a real-world scenario and provide scientific data on symptomatic improvement and supportive treatment in liver function with improvement in quality of life. Methods Adult patients of either sex with one or more clinical symptoms like fatigue, nausea, anorexia, abdominal pain or discomfort, muscle cramps, jaundice, or any other signs and symptoms with a history suggestive of mild-to-moderate hepatic disorders like alcoholic liver disease (ALD), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), drug-induced hepatotoxicity, or hepatitis were treated with two Liv.52 DS tablets (oral) twice daily for 12 weeks. Results Out of the 1000 enrolled patients, 962 (96%) completed the study with the following subgroups ALD: 375 (38.9%), NAFLD: 379 (39.3%), drug-induced hepatotoxicity: 78 (8.1%), hepatitis: 130 (13.5%). The mean age of enrolled patients was 37.7 years, and the majority of them, 785 (78.5%) were men. The common adverse events observed (with >1.5% incidence) in the study were abdominal pain: 26 (2.6%) and headache: 17 (1.7%). Liv.52 showed statistically significant improvement (P<0.0001) in various clinical signs and symptoms in the majority of patients namely, fatigue: 357/723 (49%), anorexia: 485/620 (78.2%), jaundice: 48/52 (92%). Majority of the patients showed significant improvements from baseline to end of 12 weeks in the liver function test parameters namely, aspartate aminotransferase: 633/840 (75.36%), alanine aminotransferase: 592/729 (81.21%), serum bilirubin: 244/347 (70.32%), alkaline phosphatase: 279/355 (78.59%) with P<0.0001 for all parameters. Statistically significant improvement (P<0.005) was also seen in all the components of the chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ) scores from baseline to 12 weeks. Conclusions The study demonstrated that Liv.52 was hepatoprotective and well tolerated in the study population after treatment for 12 weeks. Significant improvements were seen in clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory parameters of liver function, and CLDQ scores from baseline to 12 weeks. No significant or new safety signals emerged from this study.

Logistic regression analysis of environmental and other variables and incidences of tuberculosis in respiratory patients.

The objective of this study was to examine the association of 14 variables with TB in respiratory patients. The variables included: urban/rural, persons in 1200 sqft area, TB in family, crowding, smoking (family member), gender, age, education, smoking, workplace, kitchen location, cooking fuel, ventilation, and kerosene uses. Eight hundred respiratory patients were tested for sputum positive pulmonary TB; 500 had TB and 300 did not. An analysis of the unadjusted odds ratio (UOR) and adjusted OR (AOR) was undertaken using logistic regression to link the probability of TB incidences with the variables. There was an inconsistency in the significance of variables using UOR and AOR. A subset model of 4 variables (kerosene uses, ventilation, workplace, and gender) based on significant AOR was adjudged acceptable for estimating the probability of TB incidences. Uses of kerosene (AOR 2.62 (1.95, 3.54)) consistently related to incidences of TB. It was estimated that 50% reduction in kerosene uses could reduce the probability of TB by 13.29% in respiratory patients. The major recommendation was to replace kerosene uses from households with a supply of clean fuel like liquid petroleum or natural gas and rural electrification.

Management of interstitial lung diseases: A consensus statement of the Indian Chest Society (ICS) and National College of Chest Physicians (NCCP).

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a complex and heterogeneous group of acute and chronic lung diseases of several known and unknown causes. While clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) have been recently updated, CPG for ILD other than IPF are needed. METHODS: A working group of multidisciplinary clinicians familiar with clinical management of ILD (pulmonologists, radiologist, pathologist, and rheumatologist) and three epidemiologists selected by the leaderships of Indian Chest Society and National College of Chest Physicians, India, posed questions to address the clinically relevant situation. A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. A modified GRADE approach was used to grade the evidence. The working group discussed the evidence and reached a consensus of opinions for each question following face-to-face discussions. RESULTS: Statements have been made for each specific question and the grade of evidence has been provided after performing a systematic review of literature. For most of the questions addressed, the available evidence was insufficient and of low to very low quality. The consensus of the opinions of the working group has been presented as statements for the questions and not as an evidence-based CPG for the management of ILD. CONCLUSION: This document provides the guidelines made by consensus of opinions among experts following discussion of systematic review of evidence pertaining to the specific questions for management of ILD other than IPF. It is hoped that this document will help the clinician understand the accumulated evidence and help better management of idiopathic and nonidiopathic interstitial pneumonias.

Management of interstitial lung diseases: A consensus statement of the Indian Chest Society (ICS) and National College of Chest Physicians (NCCP)

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a complex and heterogeneous group of acute and chronic lung diseases of several known and unknown causes. While clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) have been recently updated, CPG for ILD other than IPF are needed. Methods: A working group of multidisciplinary clinicians familiar with clinical management of ILD (pulmonologists, radiologist, pathologist, and rheumatologist) and three epidemiologists selected by the leaderships of Indian Chest Society and National College of Chest Physicians, India, posed questions to address the clinically relevant situation. A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. A modified GRADE approach was used to grade the evidence. The working group discussed the evidence and reached a consensus of opinions for each question following face-to-face discussions. Results: Statements have been made for each specific question and the grade of evidence has been provided after performing a systematic review of literature. For most of the questions addressed, the available evidence was insufficient and of low to very low quality. The consensus of the opinions of the working group has been presented as statements for the questions and not as an evidence-based CPG for the management of ILD. Conclusion: This document provides the guidelines made by consensus of opinions among experts following discussion of systematic review of evidence pertaining to the specific questions for management of ILD other than IPF. It is hoped that this document will help the clinician understand the accumulated evidence and help better management of idiopathic and nonidiopathic interstitial pneumonias.

Protocol for the management of newly diagnosed cases of tuberculosis.

To achieve the targets and milestones set by the World Health Organization (3) to their 'End TB Strategy' to stop the global TB epidemic by 2035 and India's commitment to eliminate this disease from the country by 2025 (4), it will be important to improve the case finding and effectively treat cases of tuberculosis both in the public and the private sector, the latter still holding a major share. To strengthen the management of tuberculosis in the private sector and to have uniformity in the treatment, we need to have a protocol, suitable to our socio-economic conditions, which will not only provide guidance in getting better treatment outcomes, but also help to interrupt transmission of the disease in the community, besides curbing the development of drug resistance. Several guidelines on the management of tuberculosis are available, but these are considered as very good starting points for treatment but not the only treatment option, since guidelines cannot address every possible situation and substitute for good clinical judgment (5).Hence to meet these requirements and shortcomings following protocol is provided to manage cases of tuberculosis and resolve several issues related to it.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: Clinical manifestations - Prospective data from the interstitial lung disease-India registry.

CONTEXT: Multiple environmental factors are associated with development of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), and diagnostic algorithms for the diagnosis of HP have been proposed in recent perspectives. AIMS: We analyzed the data of patients with HP from interstitial lung disease (ILD)-India registry. The analysis was performed to (1) find the prevalence of HP, (2) reclassify HP as per a recently proposed classification criterion to assess the level of diagnostic certainty, and (3) identify the causative agents for HP. SETTING AND DESIGNS: This was a prospective multicenter study of consecutive, consenting adult patients with new-onset ILD from 27 centers across India (March 2012-April 2015). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The diagnoses were based on prespecified working clinical criteria and multidisciplinary discussions. To assess strength of diagnosis based on available clinical information, patients with HP were subclassified into definite HP, HP with high level of confidence, and HP with low level of confidence using a recent classification scheme. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirteen of 1084 patients with new-onset ILD were clinically diagnosed with HP and subclassified as HP with high level of confidence (380, 74.1%), HP with low level of confidence (106, 20.7%), and definite HP (27, 5.3%). Exposures among patients with HP were birds (odds ratios [OR]: 3.52, P < 0.001), air-conditioners (OR: 2.23, P < 0.001), molds (OR: 1.79, P < 0.001), rural residence (OR: 1.64, P < 0.05), and air-coolers (OR: 1.45, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: About 47.3% of patients with new-onset ILD in India were diagnosed with HP, the majority of whom were diagnosed as HP with a high level of confidence. The most common exposures were birds, cooling devices, and visible molds.

Interstitial Lung Disease in India. Results of a Prospective Registry.

RATIONALE: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a heterogeneous group of acute and chronic inflammatory and fibrotic lung diseases. Existing ILD registries have had variable findings. Little is known about the clinical profile of ILDs in India. OBJECTIVES: To characterize new-onset ILDs in India by creating a prospective ILD using multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) to validate diagnoses. METHODS: Adult patients of Indian origin living in India with new-onset ILD (27 centers, 19 Indian cities, March 2012-June 2015) without malignancy or infection were included. All had connective tissue disease (CTD) serologies, spirometry, and high-resolution computed tomography chest. ILD pattern was defined by high-resolution computed tomography images. Three groups independently made diagnoses after review of clinical data including that from prompted case report forms: local site investigators, ILD experts at the National Data Coordinating Center (NDCC; Jaipur, India) with MDD, and experienced ILD experts at the Center for ILD (CILD; Seattle, WA) with MDD. Cohen's κ was used to assess reliability of interobserver agreement. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 1,084 patients were recruited. Final diagnosis: hypersensitivity pneumonitis in 47.3% (n = 513; exposure, 48.1% air coolers), CTD-ILD in 13.9%, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in 13.7%. Cohen's κ: 0.351 site investigator/CILD, 0.519 site investigator/NDCC, and 0.618 NDCC/CILD. CONCLUSIONS: Hypersensitivity pneumonitis was the most common new-onset ILD in India, followed by CTD-ILD and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; diagnoses varied between site investigators and CILD experts, emphasizing the value of MDD in ILD diagnosis. Prompted case report forms including environmental exposures in prospective registries will likely provide further insight into the etiology and management of ILD worldwide.