RESUMO
Objectives:The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the different variations of the median nerve (MN) and the diagnostic methods used to identify carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), a common neuropathy resulting from the entrapment of the MN within the carpal tunnel. Understanding the different variations of the MN is crucial in order to prevent injuries during surgical treatment of the syndrome. Materials and methods:Data were extracted from studies published in PubMed. A detailed search in PubMed was performed for studies that reviewed the variations of the MN and CTS. Results:There are two main classifications of the MN, known as the Lanz and Amadio categories. Lanz's classification is the one being mostly used in the surgical literature, with group 3 (Bifid MN) being the main cause of the CTS. Additionally, there are branches and anastomosis of the MN that do not fit into either category, with the third common digital branch being the most injured nerve during carpal tunnel release surgery. Diagnostic techniques for CTS include physical examination combined with NCS tests, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, or elastography. While NCS has been previously the most commonly used diagnostic method, the recent literature suggests that ultrasound and elastography are the most accurate techniques. Conclusions:In order to minimize injuries during carpal tunnel release surgery, it is crucial to have knowledge on the different variations of the MN that cause CTS. Additionally, this review emphasizes the significance of the current diagnostic methods, which not only make CTS more affordable but also facilitate easier recognition of the condition.
RESUMO
Craniosynostosis is a fetal skull condition that occurs when one or multiple sutures merge prematurely. This leads to limited growth perpendicular to the fused suture, which results in compensatory growth of cranial bones parallel to it. Syndromic craniosynostosis ensues when the cranial deformity is accompanied by respiratory, neurological, cardiac, musculoskeletal, and audio-visual abnormalities. The most common syndromes are Apert, Crouzon, Pfeiffer, Muenke, and Saethre-Chotzen syndromes and craniofrontonasal syndrome. Each of these syndromes has distinct genetic mutations that contribute to their development. Mutations in genes such as FGFR, TWIST, and EFNB1 have been identified as playing a role in the development of these syndromes. Familiarity with the genetic basis of each syndrome is not only essential for identifying them but also advantageous for current pharmacological investigations. Surgical treatment is often necessary for syndromic craniosynostosis to correct the cranial deformities. Advances have been made in surgical techniques for each specific syndrome, but further research is needed to develop personalized approaches that address the unique symptoms and complications of individual patients, particularly those related to neurological and respiratory issues. This group of syndromes included in cranial synostosis presents significant educational and clinical interest due to the wide range of symptoms and the variable course of the disease, especially in the last decades when crucial advances in diagnosis and treatment have been achieved, altering the prognosis as well as the quality of life of these patients. In summary, this article provides a comprehensive overview of syndromic craniosynostosis, including the genetic mutations associated with each syndrome and the surgical treatment options available.
