Cardioprotective effects of intracoronary administration of 4-chlorodiazepam in small and large animal models of ischemia-reperfusion.

BACKGROUND: The Translocator Protein (TSPO) of the mitochondrial membrane has been recognized as a potential therapeutic target for mitigation of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Administration of 4-chlorodiazepam (4-CLD), a TSPO ligand, has been shown to confer acute cardioprotective effects in small animals; however, long-term studies and studies in clinically-relevant large animal models are lacking. In the present study we investigated a potential cardioprotective effect of intracoronary administration of 4-CLD in small and large animal models of ischemia-reperfusion. METHODS: Acute myocardial infarction was induced in 38 Wistar rats and 29 farm pigs by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery, followed by reperfusion. Animals were randomized to undergo intracoronary infusion of 2µM 4-CLD or vehicle just prior (pigs) or immediately after (rats) reperfusion. Infarcted rats were euthanized either after 1h of reperfusion (for histological assessment of the "no reflow" area) or after 60days (for serial evaluation of cardiac function and structure by echocardiography and assessment of infarct size). Infarcted pigs were euthanized after 2h of reperfusion for histological assessment of infarct size and "no reflow" area. RESULTS: In infarcted rats, intracoronary infusion of 4-CLD resulted in acute reduction of the "no reflow" area and conferred durable long-term structural and functional benefits (reduction in infarct size, attenuation of adverse remodeling, improvement in global systolic function). In infarcted pigs, intracoronary infusion of 4-CLD was well-tolerated from a hemodynamic standpoint and resulted in acute reduction in infarct size, reduction in "no reflow" area and more rapid resolution of ST-segment elevation. CONCLUSIONS: In a rat model of myocardial infarction, intracoronary administration of 4-CLD attenuated the "no reflow" phenomenon and produced long-term structural and functional benefits. In a porcine model of myocardial infarction intracoronary administration of 4-CLD did not raise safety concerns and conferred acute cardioprotective effects.

Dabigatran etexilate as second-line therapy in patients with a left ventricular assist device.

INTRODUCTION: Administration of anticoagulation is mandatory in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Vitamin K antagonists require regular monitoring and dosage adjustment. Dabigatran administered in a standard dose twice daily is more convenient and achieves a stable anticoagulant effect, but its effectiveness and safety in patients with LVADs has not been investigated. The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether dabigatran can be used safely as a second-line anticoagulation option in patients with a HeartMate II (HMII) LVAD. METHODS: The study population consisted of 7 consecutive patients with end-stage heart failure who underwent HMII implantation and sequentially received acenocoumarol and dabigatran. Occurrence of stroke, systematic embolism, device thrombosis and major or life-threatening bleeding were included in the analysis. An acute decrease in plasma hemoglobin >2 g/dL or a need for transfusion of at least 2 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC) was defined as major bleeding, while an acute decrease in plasma hemoglobin >5 g/dL, fatal, symptomatic intracranial bleed, need for transfusion of at least 4 units PRBC, or association with hypotension requiring the use of intravenous inotropic agents or surgical intervention was defined as life-threatening bleeding. RESULTS: The duration of follow up was 1564 ± 292 days. Patients received acenocoumarol for 855 ± 246 days, followed by dabigatran for 708 ± 368 days. The rates of thromboembolic events were similar under dabigatran and acenocoumarol treatment: strokes, 0.094 vs. 0 /patient-year, p=0.36; systemic embolism, no event in either group; and device thrombosis, 0.053 vs. 0.258 events/patient-year, p=0.19, respectively. Compared to an adjusted acenocoumarol dose, the standard dabigatran dose resulted in similar rates of life-threatening bleeding, but significantly lower rates of major bleeding (0.18 vs. 0.27 bleeds/patient-years, p=0.76, and 0.047 vs. 0.547, p<0.001, for dabigatran and acenocoumarol, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The safe and effective use of dabigatran as a second-line anticoagulation therapy in patients with HMII seems feasible. However, these data must be confirmed in a randomized study.

Chronotropic incompetence and abnormal heart rate recovery early after left ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: Chronotropic response to exercise and heart rate recovery immediately after exercise (HRR(1) ) are valid prognostic markers in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). The aim of this study was to evaluate heart rate profile during and after exercise in CHF patients early after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. METHODS: We enrolled seven stable consecutive CHF patients (five males, mean age: 45 ± 16 years) after 1 month of LVAD (HeartMate II; Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, CA, USA) implantation, seven healthy subjects, and 14 patients with advanced HF (HF control group) who performed an incremental symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). CHF patients performed CPET at 1 and 3 months after LVAD. HRR(1) was defined as the HR difference from peak to 1 minute after exercise and chronotropic response to exercise as the chronotropic reserve ([CR, %]=[peak HR-resting HR/220-age-resting HR]× 100). RESULTS: LVAD patients 3 months after implantation had a significantly different HR profile during exercise compared to healthy controls, with significantly lower CR (57 ± 31 vs 90 ± 14, %, P < 0.001) and HRR(1) (14 ± 6 vs 28 ± 8, bpm, P < 0.01). HR profile during exercise did not significantly change 1 and 3 months after LVAD implantation. There was no statistical difference compared to HF control group and LVAD group regarding cardiopulmonary parameters. CONCLUSIONS: LVAD patients present an impaired CR and an abnormal HRR(1) after implantation, indicating significant cardiac autonomic abnormalities. These alterations seem to remain unaltered 3 months after LVAD implantation.