Enteral Feedings Do Not Increase the Risk of NEC in ELBW Infants Undergoing Treatment of Patent Ductus Arteriosus With Acetaminophen.

OBJECTIVE: Acetaminophen (APAP) is an alternative to indomethacin and ibuprofen for treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). The side effect profile of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) presents enteral feeding safety concerns; however, the safety of enteral feeding on APAP is largely unknown. Optimal feeding strategies during pharmacological PDA treatment are unknown, leading to practice variation. This study aims to assess the incidence of adverse gastrointestinal (GI) outcomes in neonates treated with APAP for PDA closure while receiving enteral feedings. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study of 59 extremely low birth weight (ELBW), premature neonates who received APAP for PDA treatment divided into Low Volume (LV; ≤ 20 mL/kg/day) and High Volume (HV; > 20 mL/kg/day) enteral feeding groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of any suspected or confirmed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Timing of nutrition milestones, parenteral nutrition (PN) days, and adverse outcomes (feeding intolerance, liver dysfunction, death prior to discharge) were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of suspected or confirmed NEC was 19.5% in the LV group and 13.3% in the HV group (p = 0.593). The HV group reached full feeds 6 days sooner (18 vs 24 days, p = 0.024) and had fewer PN days (17 vs 23.5 days, p = 0.044) with no difference in adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of > 20 mL/kg/day of enteral feeds during APAP treatment of PDA decreased time to full feeds and PN days compared to trophic feedings (≤ 20 mL/kg/day) with no difference in adverse GI outcomes. Continuing enteral feeding during APAP PDA treatment appears safe while improving achievement of nutritional milestones.

Opioid Use in Vaso-Occlusive Crisis During Intravenous Opioid Drug Shortage.

Introduction: In October 2017, the Food and Drug Administration announced a shortage of intravenous (IV) opioid medications. Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are particularly vulnerable, as high amounts of IV opioid medications are standard therapy during vaso-occlusive crises (VOC). Our institution responded to the crises by implementing IV to oral (PO) conversions of opioid therapies and encouraging multimodal pain management with non-opioid medications. Objectives: The primary objective was the assessment of IV opioid medication utilization before and during the shortage. Secondary objectives included total opioid consumption, length of stay, and prescribing of non-opioid analgesics. Methods: This single-institution retrospective study included patients >18 years of age admitted to adult medicine teams with VOC during February 2017 or February 2018. The amount of opioid medication administered to patients during both periods was assessed, and quantities were then converted to PO morphine milligram equivalents and compared between years. The number of patients receiving scheduled non-opioid medications were also compared. Length of stay and readmissions were compared between years. Results: Between 2017 and 2018, IV opioid use for VOC decreased by 52% on inpatient services, and there was a 34% reduction in overall opioid use. Oral opioid use more than doubled during the period (10.2% in 2017 vs 39.1% in 2018, P < .01). LOS between 2017 and 2018 (6 vs 6 days, P = .4774) and total number of ED visits (27 vs 8, P = .276) were similar. There were significantly fewer 30-day readmissions in 2018 versus 2017 (15 vs 28, P = .025). Conclusion: The implementation of IV opioid restrictions resulted in a decrease in IV opioid use in treatment of VOC in patients with SCD without causing increases in length of stay or readmissions. Oral opioids should be considered an option for VOC management in patients with SCD.

Caplacizumab for Acute Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura.

Acute thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP) is a rare microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. Standard of care currently includes plasma exchange and immunosuppressive agents, including glucocorticoids, vincristine, and rituximab. Even with these therapies, relapse occurs in 36% of patients, and mortality ranges from 10% to 20%. Caplacizumab is a novel agent approved for the treatment of adult patients with aTTP in conjunction with plasma exchange and immunosuppressive therapies. It works by binding to the A1 domain of von Willebrand factor (VWF), blocking platelets from binding to VWF and aggregating. In clinical trials, patients who received caplacizumab compared with placebo were more likely to have a normalization of their platelet count, a lower rate of recurrence, and a lower incidence of the composite of aTTP-related death, recurrence, or major thromboembolic event. The side effect profile is rather benign and includes epistaxis, headache, and gingival bleeding. Caplacizumab is only available through specialty pharmacy services due to its high cost. Providers should be aware of and prepared for the prior authorization process required to assist their patients in gaining access to the medication. Currently, there is no formal consensus regarding caplacizumab's place in therapy for patients with aTTP, but it remains an option for refractory cases.