Evaluation of the nephrotoxicity of iodixanol in patients with predisposing factors to contrast medium induced nephropathy referred for contrast enhanced computed tomography.

To determine the risk of developing contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) in intermediate-risk patients receiving iodixanol, an iso-osmolar, dimeric non-ionic contrast agent, for CT in a clinical setting. Hundred consecutive patients referred for a contrast enhanced CT with a serum creatinine concentration>1.1mg/dl and/or a glomerular filtration rate (GFR)<90ml/min were included. Exclusion criteria were a serum creatinine>2.0mg/dl and a GFR<30ml/min or concurrent nephrotoxic agents. Between 60 and 140ml (mean 97+/-42ml) iodixanol (320mgI/ml) were administered at a flow of 2.5-3ml/s. Hydration with 500ml NaCl i.v. was performed before and after contrast injection. Follow-up was completed in 99 patients (age, 64+/-13 years, 68 men). CIN was defined as increase in serum creatinine concentration +0.5mg/dl or >25% above baseline within 72h after contrast administration. Serum creatinine concentration and GFR were 1.40+/-0.22, 1.29+/-0.29, and 1.26+/-0.29mg/dl and 52.2+/-13.9, 51.3+/-21.1, and 51.5+/-15.1ml/min on days 0, 3, and 7, respectively. Three out of 99 (3%) patients who received 90-110ml iodixanol revealed a CIN on day 3 without persistence on day 7. No specific therapy was needed. One out of 99 patients reported an exanthema on days 3 and 7. With the use of iodixanol in intermediate-risk patients, 3% of the patients develop CIN on day 3 without need for a specific therapy or persistence on day 7.

A prospective study comparing different iodine concentrations for triphasic multidetector row CT of the upper abdomen.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of different iodine concentrations at either constant injection or iodine administration rates but constant total iodine load on contrast enhancement of liver, pancreas and spleen by multidetector row CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty consecutive patients (70+/-6 years) underwent triphasic liver CT at a four-channel multidetector-row CT using the non-ionic contrast medium iopromide. Patients were divided into six equal groups-I: 150 ml, 240 mg/ml at 4 ml/s; II: 120 ml, 300 mg/ml at 4 ml/s; III: 97.3 ml, 370 mg/ml at 4 ml/s; IV: 150 ml, 240 mg/ml at 5 ml/s; V: 120 ml, 300 mg/ml, 60 ml at 6 ml/s, 60 ml at 3 ml/s; VI: 97.3 ml, 370 mg/ml at 3.3 ml/s. ROIs were measured in the liver, the pancreas, and the spleen in unenhanced, arterial, portal venous, and equilibrium phase. RESULTS: At a constant injection rate of 4 ml/s, pancreatic enhancement over baseline only in the arterial phase was significantly higher at 370 mg/ml (58+/-15 HU versus 59+/-18 HU versus 74+/-20 HU for groups I-III, respectively (p<0.02)). Comparison of different iodine concentrations at constant iodine administration rate (groups II, IV and VI) and of all six protocols revealed no significant differences at either phase. CONCLUSIONS: At a constant iodine load and constant injection rates, the high-iodinated contrast agent iopromide at 370 mg/ml improves pancreatic enhancement in the arterial phase. At constant iodine load and constant iodine administration rates, there is no significant effect of different iodine concentrations.

Comparison of different iodine concentrations for multidetector row computed tomography angiography of segmental renal arteries.

The aims of this study were (1) to assess the diagnostic performance of multidetector row computed tomography angiography (CTA) on imaging of renal artery branches and (2) to investigate the effect of different iodine concentrations at constant total iodine load and either constant injection rates or constant iodine administration rates. A number of 120 consecutive patients (71+/-6 years of age) underwent CTA of renal arteries (collimation 4 x 1 mm) using the nonionic contrast medium iopromide, and were divided into six equal groups: 1: 150 ml, 240 mg/ml at 4 ml/s; 2: 120 ml, 300 mg/ml at 4 ml/s; 3: 97.3 ml, 370 mg/ml at 4 ml/s; 4: 150 ml, 240 mg/ml at 5 ml/s; 5: 120 ml, 300 mg/ml, 60 ml at 6 ml/s, 60 ml at 3 ml/s; 6: 97.3 ml, 370 mg/ml at 3.3 ml/s. The image quality of the main renal arteries (n=240) and their first-order to fourth-order branches was scored as 0 for no visualization, 1 for only visualization, and 2 for diagnostic. All main renal arteries were diagnostic. First-order branches had score 2 in 38/40, 40/40, 37/40, 38/40, 39/40, and 40/40 patients for groups 1-6, respectively (p=0.34). Second-order branches were imaged best in group 2 (p<0.002)). Third-order branches had score 2 in only 1/40, 5/40, 1/40, 2/40, 0/40, and 2/40 renal arteries. Fourth-order branches were not imaged diagnostically. At a constant total iodine load, the main renal arteries and their first-order branches achieved diagnostic image quality at all iodine concentrations in four-channel multidetector row CTA for the protocols tested. Second-order renal artery branches were imaged best at 120 ml contrast medium with an iodine concentration of 300 mg/ml at 4 ml/s.