Impact of 'Never Use' Abbreviations (Error-Prone Abbreviations-EPA's) List on the Incidence of EPAs in Inpatient Medical Prescriptions in Apex Tertiary Care Public Hospital in India.

AIM: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of never-use list and standardized abbreviations on error prone abbreviations. BACKGROUND: Abbreviations are commonly used in medical records to save time and space but use in prescriptions, which can lead to communication failures and preventable harm. Prescriptions need to be clear for correct interpretation. Hospitals should implement uniform use of approved abbreviations, such as an approved list or never-use list of abbreviations and symbols. In the hospital under study, there was no system of avoiding error prone abbreviations while prescribing any medication. Hence, an interventional study was performed to quantify and reduce the incidence of error prone abbreviations. OBJECTIVES: The main objectives were to determine the incidence of error prone abbreviations, development and implementation of 'Never-use' list and standardized abbreviations and finally determine its effectiveness in reducing the error prone abbreviations in the prescriptions. METHODS: The study design was pre-post interventional / quasi-experimental design. The settings were inpatient wards of broad specialties of a tertiary care hospital. 'Never-use' list and standardized abbreviations were developed by review of relevant literature, existing lists by Institute for Safe Medication Practices and Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care compared against findings of the pilot study of prescriptions for error prone abbreviations and experts' input. Poster copies of the lists were affixed in inpatient wards, doctors were educated, and poster pamphlets were distributed. Pre-intervention data was collected by a retrospective closed in-patient medical record review. Post-interventional incidence of error prone abbreviations was determined, and the effectiveness of the same was assessed by using statistical analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of error abbreviations in inpatient prescriptions was 47.5%, and the 'Never Use' list of abbreviations led to a statistically significant reduction of error prone abbreviations by 8.2% from 47.5% to 43.6% (P\0.006). CONCLUSION: 'Never Use' lists are effective in reducing the incidence of common error-prone abbreviations, and discipline-wise variation is observed.

Converting an Under-Construction Healthcare Facility into a COVID-19 Screening and Emergency Response Centre During Complete Lockdown in India.

In view of the COVID-19 surge, the construction of the Burns and Plastic Surgery Block at AIIMS, New Delhi was expedited at war footing level and converted into a COVID-19 Emergency response Centre (ERC). Engineering works were completed in a speedy manner and various patient care areas were equipped as deemed necessary for providing tertiary care to COVID-19 patients. A highly spirited team comprising of Emergency Medicine Specialists, Anesthesia and Critical Care specialist, Hospital Administrators and Nursing Officers was formed. Effective segregation of patient care areas into clean, contaminated, and intermediate zones was done using physical barriers and air conditioning modifications. The screening area for patients suspected of having COVID-19 was created in addition to a 2-step process i.e., Triage 1 and Triage 2, thereafter, patients requiring admission would be referred to the emergency area. An in-house designed and fabricated sampling booth was created to bring down the use of PPEs and for better infection control. The ERC has a general ward and state of the art intensive care units. Mobilizing resources (machinery, manpower, consumables etc.) during the lockdown required commitment from top leadership, motivated teams, expeditious procurement, coordination with multiple agencies working on site, expediting statutory clearances, coordination with police services, transportation of labor etc.

National guidelines for sanitation services: Addressing the unmet need of standardizing cleaning practices in tertiary care public health facilities of a developing country.

BACKGROUND: Cleanliness is one of the main reasons for poor satisfaction among the patients and their attendants visiting healthcare facilities. OBJECTIVE: To elevate and transform the sanitation in public sector facilities, a committee was constituted by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India to study the existing system of Housekeeping in Central Government Hospitals and draft the Guidelines for house-keeping services, since no such literature is available in context of the healthcare facilities in India. METHODS: The committee ascertained the housekeeping services in three tertiary care hospitals of Central Government and simultaneously conducted the literature review of the best practices in hospital sanitation and housekeeping. RESULTS: Formulated national guidelines focus on various aspects of sanitation services in health facilities, i.e., hospital infrastructure; organization of sanitation services; human resource requirements; qualification, experience and training needs of sanitation staff; roles and responsibilities of different personnel; risk categorization of hospital areas; mechanized cleaning; cleaning agents; cleaning standards and standard operating procedures; effective supervision and monitoring; procurement of these services, etc. CONCLUSION: Formulated guidelines can be adopted by developing countries aiming for standardizing cleaning practices in public health facilities.

A study on economic evaluation of an outreach health-care facility in Jhajjar District of Haryana: Service delivery model for increasing access to health care.

BACKGROUND: An outreach (OR) health-care facility providing broad specialty outpatient services was started by All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, in rural area of district Jhajjar, Haryana. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to ascertain the resource requirement for establishing an OR health-care facility and patient satisfaction with regard to the services being provided. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2017 at an OR Outpatient Department (OPD) of AIIMS, New Delhi, at Jhajjar. Service delivery model adopted for health-care delivery was hub and spoke. Traditional method of costing was used for economic evaluation. Feedback pro forma of 400 patients who attended OPD services was analyzed to measure health service accessibility. RESULTS: Capital expenditure to set up the facility was calculated to be approximately INR 17,57,49,074/- ($ 2,703,832) and operational cost per year was approximately INR 8,73,86,370/- ($ 1,344,406). Approximate per-patient cost for single OPD consultation was calculated to be INR 874 ($13.45) which included medicines and investigations. High scores for all domains of accessibility of health care were observed. CONCLUSION: The study provides a preliminary evidence that OR health-care facilities can be instrumental in increasing access to health-care delivery with lesser capital outlays, however, large-scale multicentric studies are needed to arrive at any conclusion. The services have been very well accepted by the local community members being quality medical care with highly subsidized health-care services.