RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the intensive care unit treatments applied to obstetrics patients with a diagnosis of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The cases of 7 pregnant patients who had been diagnosed with PRES between July 2011 and July 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients' clinical data, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images before and after treatment, and neuropsychological tests were evaluated. RESULTS: Five out of 7 patients had eclampsia, 1 patient had severe preeclampsia, and 1 patient developed HELLP syndrome secondary to PRES. Calcium channel blockers and ß-blockers were used as antihypertensive treatment. All patients were treated with parenteral magnesium sulfate. In addition, sodium thiopental was given to control sedation and convulsions in all patients except 1. The neurological and radiological findings of all cases treated in the intensive care unit improved. CONCLUSION: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome is a clinical condition with a multifactorial etiology and can result in different clinical findings. Radiological imaging techniques can be used for the diagnosis of PRES. Pregnancy and the postpartum period often lead to this syndrome. In some cases, PRES can cause irreversible neurological deficits or death. For patients with severe radiological findings, early diagnosis and thiopental infusion, in addition to treatment with antihypertensive agents and magnesium sulfate, may lead to quicker and more effective recovery from clinical manifestations. We suggest supplementation of standard treatment with early thiopental infusion.
RESUMO
AIM: To evaluate and compare analgesic efficacy, drug consumption and patient satisfaction with the i.v. patient-controlled and continuous infusion modes of administration of tramadol. METHODS: A total of 40 pregnant women in American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system risk classes I-II scheduled for cesarean section were randomized into two groups to receive treatment in single-blind fashion. Patients in both groups received tramadol as an i.v. infusion 15 min before the end of surgery under general anesthesia for cesarean section. In the post-anesthesia care unit, the 20 patients allocated to group I were given i.v. tramadol in patient-controlled anesthesia (PCA), while the 20 other patients assigned to group II received it as a continuous infusion. Pain visual analog scores (VAS), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, total tramadol consumption, sedation scores, side-effects (nausea/vomiting) and patient satisfaction were evaluated seven times in the course of the first postoperative 24 h. The Mann-Whitney U-test and Friedman's anova were used for the statistical treatment of data. RESULTS: VAS, sedation scores and nausea/vomiting scores were similar in both groups (P > 0.05). The 24-h tramadol consumption was significantly lower in group I (420.15 ± 66.58 mg) than in group II (494.00 ± 29.45 mg), while patient satisfaction was significantly higher in group I (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: While tramadol administration by either of the methods used may ensure efficient early postoperative anesthesia in cesarean section patients, i.v. PCA may be preferred because of the lower drug consumption and higher patient satisfaction associated with it.
