The burden of anxiety among a nationally representative US adult population.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent and are associated with a significant humanistic and economic burden. This study evaluates the impact of anxiety symptoms on direct and indirect costs and quality of life in individuals with self-reported and unrecognized anxiety symptoms. METHODS: The 2019 US National Health and Wellness Survey database was analyzed to compare individuals with anxiety symptoms to individuals without symptoms, stratified by responses to a yes/no question about experiencing anxiety symptoms, and further stratified by severity of symptoms based on GAD-7 scores. Individuals who responded 'yes' were characterized as having self-reported anxiety symptoms, and those who responded 'no' were screened for unrecognized anxiety symptoms. RESULTS: Overall, 44.0 % of the population experienced anxiety symptoms, of which 32.5 % self-reported experiencing anxiety, while an additional 11.5 % had mild to severe symptoms but did not self-identify as having anxiety. Both groups experienced significantly worse quality of life, and higher direct and indirect costs than a control group who had no anxiety symptoms (GAD-7 ≤ 4). Individuals with more severe anxiety symptoms experienced worse outcomes. LIMITATIONS: The data were cross-sectional, so causality could not be determined. Outcomes were based on self-report, and are therefore subject to reporting and recall bias. Prevalence and severity were assessed using the GAD-7, and not clinically validated. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of the population experiences anxiety symptoms without recognizing it. Anxiety symptoms had a significant impact on quality of life, direct costs, and indirect costs, representing a considerable burden that increased with severity of illness.

Immediate versus delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery in children: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Children with bilateral cataracts may undergo immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS), which involves surgery on both eyes during the same general anaesthesia, or delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS), which involves operating on each eye on separate days and requires a second anaesthesia. ISBCS is viewed with caution because of the risk of bilateral endophthalmitis. Proponents of ISBCS emphasise that the incidence of serious complications is low and is outweighed by benefits such as avoidance of multiple anaesthesia, faster visual rehabilitation and potential for decreased costs. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding the cost-effectiveness of ISBCS in children. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to determine whether ISBCS is more cost-effective than DSBCS from the societal and health system perspectives in Ontario, Canada, which has a universal, single-payer system. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of children who underwent ISBCS or DSBCS at a tertiary referral paediatric hospital was conducted. A decision tree was constructed using TreeAge Pro 2018 software. Clear visual axis was the measure of effectiveness. A time horizon of 8 weeks postoperatively was adopted. Both direct and indirect costs were included. RESULTS: Fifty-three children were included, 37 in the ISBCS group and 16 in the DSBCS group. ISBCS and DSBCS were equally effective. ISBCS resulted in cost-savings of $3,776 (95% CI:-$4,641 to $12,578) CAD, per patient, from the societal perspective and $2,200 (95% CI:-$5,615 to $10,373) CAD per patient from the health system perspective. CONCLUSION: ISBCS was less costly than DSBCS from both societal and health system perspectives while being equally effective.

Economic analyses of mental health and substance use interventions in the workplace: a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis.

Mental illness and substance use disorders in the workplace have been increasingly recognised as a problem in most countries; however, evidence is scarce on which solutions provide the highest return on investment. We searched academic and grey literature databases and additional sources for studies that included a workplace intervention for mental health or substance abuse, or both, and that did an economic analysis. We analysed the papers we found to identify the highest yielding and most cost-effective interventions by disorder. On the basis of 56 studies, we found moderate strength of evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy is cost-saving (and in some cases cost-effective) to address depression. We observed strong evidence that regular and active involvement of occupational health professionals is cost-saving and cost-effective in reducing sick leave related to mental health and in encouraging return to work. We identified moderate evidence that coverage for pharmacotherapy and brief counselling for smoking cessation are both cost-saving and cost-effective. Addressing mental health and substance misuse in the workplace improves workers' wellbeing and productivity, and benefits employers' bottom line (ie, profit). Future economic analyses would benefit from the consideration of subgroup analyses, examination of longer follow-ups, inclusion of statistical and sensitivity analyses and discussion around uncertainty, and consideration of potential for bias.