Predicting factors for omitting beta-blockers in patients with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy after successful catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Tachycardia induces a reduction in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), which is defined as tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TIC). Conversion to and maintenance of sinus rhythm by catheter ablation can improve LVEF in patients with TIC due to atrial fibrillation (AF). Beta-blockers are mandatory for the treatment of heart failure with reduced LVEF(HFrEF), but the necessity of beta-blockers in TIC patients even after catheter ablation remains unclear. We examined the effect of beta-blockers on cardiac function in TIC patients after catheter ablation. We retrospectively analyzed 124 patients with a history of heart failure and an LVEF of ≤ 50% who underwent catheter ablation for AF. TIC was defined as a ≥ 10% improvement in the baseline LVEF and an improvement to an LVEF of ≥ 50% at 6 months after ablation. Patients with other cardiomyopathy diagnosed before the ablation were excluded. LVEF was significantly increased with the reductions of the left ventricular and left atrial volumes at the 6-month follow-up in all 80 patients with TIC. No beta-blockers were prescribed during the post-ablation follow-up in 21 patients with TIC. The absolute values of and changes in the echocardiographic parameters between before and after ablation were not significantly different between patients with and without beta-blockers after the ablation. A simple score using the history of hospitalization for heart failure and use of beta-blockers or diuretics prior to ablation was useful in identifying TIC patients who did not need prescription of beta-blockers after catheter ablation. LVEF similarly improved in both patients with and without prescription of beta-blockers after the ablation. Beta-blockers may not need to be prescribed after successful catheter ablation for AF in LVEF of ≤ 50% patients without other cause of cardiomyopathy diagnosed before the ablation, a history of hospitalization for heart failure and prescription of beta-blockers and diuretics before the ablation.

Predictor of A4 amplitude using preprocedural electrocardiography in patients with leadless pacemakers.

BACKGROUND: Based on historical studies of leadless pacemakers (LPs), high atrioventricular synchrony (AVS) with mechanical sensing-based VDD pacing is largely influenced by A4 amplitude. A limited study investigated the predictors of A4 amplitude using clinical and echocardiographic parameters. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictors of A4 amplitude preoperatively to select patients who could benefit the most from AVS among patients with VDD LPs (Micra-AV, Medtronic). METHODS: Data from patients who received Micra-AV implantations from November 2021 to August 2023 at Tottori University Hospital were analyzed. Twelve-lead electrocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography were performed before the Micra-AV implantations. To assess the electrical indices associated with the A4 signal, electrocardiographic morphologic P-wave parameters were analyzed, including P-wave duration, P-wave amplitude, maximum deflection index (MDI), and P-wave dispersion. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients who underwent Micra-AV implantations (median age 84 years; 64% male) were included and divided into 2 groups based on the median value of A4 amplitude, the high-A4 group (A4 amplitude >2.5 m/s2; n = 26), and low-A4 group (A4 amplitude ≤2.5 m/s2; n = 24). There was a significant difference between the high-A4 and low-A4 groups with regard to left ventricular ejection fraction (P = .01), P-wave dispersion (P = .01), and MDI (P <.001). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that lower MDI was an independent predictor of high A4-amplitude (odds ratio 0.78; 95% confidence interval 0.67-0.92; P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Preoperative electrocardiographic evaluations of P-wave morphology may be useful for predicting A4 amplitude. MDI was the only independent A4 amplitude predictor that seemed promising for selecting Micra-AV patients.

Thrombin induces a temporal biphasic vascular response through the differential phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase via protease-activated receptor-1 and protein kinase C.

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) is a critical regulatory enzyme that controls vascular tone via the production of nitric oxide. Although thrombin also modulates vascular tone predominantly via the activation of protease-activated receptors (PARs), the time course and mechanisms involved in how thrombin controls eNOS enzymatic activity are unknown. eNOS enzymatic activity is enhanced by the phosphorylation of eNOS-Ser1177 and reduced by the phosphorylation of eNOS-Thr495. In this study, we hypothesized that thrombin regulates vascular tone through the differential phosphorylation of eNOS. Using rat descending aorta, we show that thrombin modulates vascular tone in an eNOS-dependent manner via activated PAR-1. We also show that thrombin causes a temporal biphasic response. Protein kinase C (PKC) is associated with second phase of thrombin-induced response. Western blot analysis demonstrated thrombin phosphorylated eNOS-Ser1177 and eNOS-Thr495 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. A PKC inhibitor suppressed the thrombin-induced phosphorylation of eNOS-Thr495, but not that of eNOS-Ser1177. Our results suggest that thrombin induces a temporal biphasic vascular response through the differential phosphorylation of eNOS via activated PAR-1. Thrombin causes transient vasorelaxation by the phosphorylation of eNOS-Ser1177, and subsequent attenuation of vasorelaxation by the phosphorylation of eNOS-Thr495 via PKC, leading to the modulation of vascular tone.