RESUMO
Background: Intraosseous (IO) infusion is a life-preserving technique when intravenous access is unobtainable. Successful IO infusion requires sufficiently high flow rates to preserve life but at low enough pressures to avoid complications. However, IO catheter tips are often misplaced, and the relative flow rates and pressures between IO catheter tips placed in medullary, trabecular, and cortical bone are not well described, which has important implications for clinical practice. Objectives: We developed the Zone Theory of IO Catheter Tip Placement based on bone density and proximity to the venous central sinus and then tested the influence of catheter tip placement locations on flow rates and pressures in a cadaveric swine model. Methods: Three cross-trained participants infused 500 mL of crystalloid fluid into cadaveric swine humerus and sternum (N = 210 trials total) using a pushâpull method with a 60 cm3 syringe. Computed tomography scans were scored by radiologists and categorized as zone 1 (medullary space), zone 2 (trabecular bone), or zone 3 (cortical bone) catheter tip placements. Differences between zones in flow rates, mean pressures, and peak pressures were assessed using analysis of variance and analysis of covariance to account for participant and site differences at the p < 0.05 threshold. Results: Zone 1 and zone 2 placements were essentially identical in flow rates, mean pressures, and peak pressures (each p > 0.05). Zone 1 and zone 2 placements were significantly higher in flow rates and lower in pressures than zone 3 placements (each p < 0.05 or less). Conclusion: Within the limitations of an unpressurized cadaveric swine model, the present findings suggest that IO catheter tip placements need not be perfect to acquire high flow rates at low pressures, only accurate enough to avoid the dense cortical bone of zone 3. Future research using in vivo animal and human models is needed to better define the clinical impact of IO catheter placement on infusion flow rates and pressures.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Intraosseous (IO) infusion, the pressurized injection of fluids into bone through a catheter, is a life-preserving resuscitative technique for treating trauma patients with severe hemorrhage. However, little is known regarding the application times, placement accuracy, and end-user ratings of battery-powered and manual IO access devices. This study was specifically designed to fill these knowledge gaps on six FDA-approved IO access devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three experienced U.S. Navy Emergency Medicine residents each placed commercially available 15-gauge IO catheters in cadaveric swine (Sus scrofa) proximal humeri and sternums in a randomized prospective experimental design. Devices included the battery-powered EZ-IO Rapid Infuser and the manual Jamshidi IO, PerSys NIO, SAM Manual IO, Tactical Advanced Lifesaving IO Needle (TALON), and PYNG First Access for Shock and Trauma 1 (30 trials per device, 10 per user, 210 total trials). Application times, placement accuracy in medullary (zone 1) and trabecular (zone 2) bone while avoiding cortical (zone 3) bone, and eight subjective user ratings were analyzed using ANOVA and nonparametric statistics at P < .05. RESULTS: The EZ-IO demonstrated the fastest application times, high rates in avoiding zone 3, and the highest user ratings (P < .0001). The TALON conferred intermediate placement times, highest rates of avoiding zone 3, and second-highest user ratings. The SAM Manual IO and Jamshidi performed poorly, with mixed results for the PerSys NIO and PYNG First Access for Shock and Trauma 1. CONCLUSIONS: The battery-powered EZ-IO performed best and remains the IO access device of choice. The present findings suggest that the TALON should be considered as a manual backup to the EZ-IO.
