Survival of Elderly Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy in an Integrated Health System.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to examine pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) perioperative outcomes and consider how age may be related to overall survival in an integrated health system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 309 patients who underwent PD between December 2008 and December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: aged 75 y or less and more than 75 y, defined as senior surgical patients. Univariate and multivariable analyses of predictive clinicopathologic factors associated with overall survival at 5 y were performed. RESULTS: In both groups, the majority underwent PD for malignant disease. The proportion of senior surgical patients alive at 5 y was 33.3% compared to 53.6% of younger patients (P = 0.003). There were also statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to body mass index, cancer antigen 19-9, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and Charlson comorbidity index. On multivariable analysis, disease type, cancer antigen 19-9, hemoglobin A1c, length of surgery, length of stay, Charlson comorbidity index, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status were found to be statistically significant factors for overall survival. Age was not significantly related to overall survival on multivariable logistic regression and when the analysis was limited to pancreatic cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although the difference in overall survival between patients aged less than and more than 75 years was significant, age was not an independent risk factor for overall survival on multivariable analysis. Rather than a patient's chronological age, his/her physiologic age including medical comorbidities and functional status may be more correlated to overall survival.

Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma: Experience Within an Integrated Health Care System.

Introduction Adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) of the pancreas is a rare form of pancreatic cancer with a worse prognosis than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The authors report on a retrospective study of 13 patients diagnosed with ASC in an integrated health care system. Methods A retrospective review was performed of all patients with pancreatic cancer identified between February 2010 and December 2018. Twenty-three patients were diagnosed with pancreatic ASC. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and median survival were evaluated. Results Median overall survival was 8 months (standard devision [SD] = 18.6). Eight out of 13 patients who received surgery upfront had a positive surgical margin (62%). Eleven patients received adjuvant therapy. Median survival for patients who received multimodal treatment was 57 months (SD = 5.7) compared with 2.5 months for patients who received only surgery. Median survival for patients with negative pathologic margins was 17 months (SD = 23.6). One patient was receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (6 months into treatment without any evidence of metastatic disease). Discussion The high proportion of positive surgical margins and large tumor size upon presentation suggest that primary tumor downstaging should be considered. The positive results from recent prospective trials on neoadjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma could be a promising foundation of information for the treatment of ASC. Conclusion ASC of the pancreas is an extremely aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. Further work is needed to determine the optimal multimodal treatment regimen.

Pancreaticogastrostomy as a fistula mitigating strategy for a high-risk pancreatic anastomosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has been associated with soft gland texture and/or small pancreatic duct. We hypothesized that selective use of pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) over pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) in those scenarios would decrease the rate of CR-POPF. METHODS: Review of prospective database of all PD's performed at a single institution between 2009 and 2019 was performed. The pancreatic remnant was deemed "high risk" if soft gland and/or small duct were present. RESULTS: PJ was performed in 199 (147 "low-risk" and 52 "high-risk") cases, and 110 patients (all "high-risk") had a PG. Overall CR-POPF rate was 11.9% with no difference between the groups. Risk-stratified analysis within PJ group showed CR-POPF rate of 5.4% versus 36% in "low-risk" versus "high risk" scenarios, respectively; the use of PG significantly decreased CR-POPF rate (9.1%, p < 0.0001). Gastrointestinal bleeding was more likely to occur following PG than PJ. Soft gland texture and gastrointestinal bleeding were the strongest predictors of CR-POPF in PJ and PG groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Selective use of PG after PD in "high-risk" scenarios mitigates the risk of CR-POPF. Increased rate of gastrointestinal bleeding calls for further refinement of the technique and heightened postoperative vigilance.

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: Rationale for Centralization in an Integrated Health Care System.

OBJECTIVES: Given the complex surgical management and infrequency of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, we hypothesized that treatment at a center of excellence improves survival. METHODS: Retrospective review identified 354 patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor treated between 2010 and 2018. Four hepatopancreatobiliary centers of excellence were created from 21 hospitals throughout Northern California. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. The χ2 test of clinicopathologic factors determined which were predictive for overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Localized disease was seen in 51% of patients, and metastatic disease was seen in 32% of patients with mean OS of 93 and 37 months, respectively (P < 0.001). On multivariate survival analysis, stage, tumor location, and surgical resection were significant for OS (P < 0.001). All stage OS for patients treated at designated centers was 80 and 60 months for noncenters (P < 0.001). Surgery was more common across stages at the centers of excellence versus noncenters at 70% and 40%, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are indolent but have malignant potential at any size with management often requiring complex surgeries. We showed survival was improved for patients treated at a center of excellence, where surgery was more frequently utilized.

Adhesion formation after laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair with polypropylene mesh: a study using abdominal ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernias is feasible and safe. Polypropylene mesh is often preferred because of its ease of handling and lower cost. Complications like adhesion and fistula formation can occur. The goal of this study was to determine whether bowel adhesions and their attendant complications could be prevented by interposition of omentum. METHODS: Thirty patients underwent laparoscopic ventral incisional hernias repair with polypropylene mesh. Omentum was always positioned over the loops of bowel for protection. At a mean follow-up of 14 months, 20 patients underwent ultrasonic examination using the previously described visceral slide technique to detect adhesions. RESULTS: The mean size of the hernias in the study was 50.3 cm2, and the mean size of the mesh applied was 275 cm2. Thirteen patents (65%) had no sonographically detectable adhesions. Five patients demonstrated adhesions between the mesh and omentum, 1 patient developed adhesions between the left lobe of the liver and the mesh, and only 1 case of bowel adhesion to the edge of the mesh was found. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic ventral incisional hernias repair with polypropylene mesh and omental interposition is not associated with visceral adhesions in the majority of patients. Polypropylene mesh can be used safely when adequate omental coverage is available.