Radiochemotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Higher-dose cisplatin every 3 weeks versus cisplatin/5-fluorouracil every 4 weeks.

Many patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LASCCHN) receive cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy. The optimal regimen is still unclear when considering both efficacy and feasibility. This study compared two regimens for locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Data of 329 patients with LASCCHN receiving definitive or postoperative radiochemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 131 patients received 100 mg/m(2) cisplatin on days 1, 22, and 43 (group A), and 198 patients received 20 mg/m(2) cisplatin plus 600/1000 mg/m(2) 5-FU on days 1-5 and days 29-33 (group B). Radiochemotherapy regimens plus nine factors were compared for LRC and OS, and radiochemotherapy regimens additionally for adverse events. On univariate analysis, chemotherapy type was not associated with LRC (p = 0.36). On multivariate analysis, performance score (p = 0.039), N-category (p = 0.007), histologic grade (p = 0.007), upfront surgery (p = 0.030), and pre-radiochemotherapy hemoglobin levels (p < 0.001) were associated with LRC. On univariate analysis, chemotherapy type had no impact on OS (p = 0.64). On multivariate analysis, performance score (p < 0.001), T-category (p = 0.025), N-category (p < 0.001), histologic grade, and hemoglobin levels (p < 0.001) were associated with OS. Renal failure occurred significantly more often in group A (p = 0.008). Otherwise, adverse events were not significantly different. Thus, both radiochemotherapy regimens appeared similarly effective for LASCCHN. Patients receiving 100 mg/m(2) of cisplatin require close monitoring of their renal function.

Comparison of radiochemotherapy alone to surgery plus radio(chemo)therapy for non-metastatic stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A matched-pair analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The standard treatment for non-metastatic stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck varies worldwide. This study compared the outcomes of radiochemotherapy alone to surgery followed by radio(chemo)therapy (radiotherapy plus/minus concurrent chemotherapy). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 148 patients treated with radiochemotherapy alone were matched to 148 patients treated with surgery plus radio(chemo)therapy. Groups were matched 1:1 for nine potential prognostic factors including age, gender, performance status, tumor site, histologic grade, T category, N category, AJCC stage, and hemoglobin level before radiotherapy, and compared for locoregional control, metastases-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: Locoregional control rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 81%, 73%, and 67% after surgery plus radio(chemo)therapy and 81%, 74%, and 65% after radiochemotherapy alone (p = 0.89). Metastases-free survival rates were 86%, 80%, and 75% after surgery plus radio(chemotherapy) versus 87%, 80%, and 72% after radiochemotherapy alone (p = 0.57). Overall survival rates were 80%, 64%, and 63% after surgery plus radio(chemo)therapy versus 83%, 68%, and 60% after radiochemotherapy alone (p = 0.96). On multivariate analyses, T category (p < 0.001), N category (p = 0.004), and hemoglobin level prior to radiotherapy (p < 0.001) were associated with locoregional control. Histologic grade (p = 0.045), T category (p < 0.001), N category (p = 0.003), and hemoglobin level prior to radiotherapy (p < 0.001) were associated with metastases-free survival. Histologic grade (p = 0.030), ECOG performance status (p = 0.033), T category (p = 0.007), N category (p = 0.024) and hemoglobin level before radiotherapy (p < 0.001) were associated with overall survival. CONCLUSION: Outcomes of radiochemotherapy alone appeared similar to those of surgery plus radio(chemo)therapy. Randomized trials comparing both treatments for different tumor sites are warranted.

Surgery followed by radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for metastatic spinal cord compression from unfavorable tumors.

PURPOSE: Despite a previously published randomized trial, controversy exists regarding the benefit of adding surgery to radiotherapy for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). It is thought that patients with MSCC from relatively radioresistant tumors or tumors associated with poor functional outcome after radiotherapy alone may benefit from surgery. This study focuses on these tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data from 67 patients receiving surgery plus radiotherapy (S+RT) were matched to 134 patients (1:2) receiving radiotherapy alone (RT). Groups were matched for 10 factors and compared for motor function, ambulatory status, local control, and survival. Additional separate matched-pair analyses were performed for patients receiving direct decompressive surgery plus stabilization of involved vertebrae (DDSS) and patients receiving laminectomy (LE). RESULTS: Improvement of motor function occurred in 22% of patients after S+RT and 16% after RT (p=0.25). Posttreatment ambulatory rates were 67% and 61%, respectively (p=0.68). Of nonambulatory patients, 29% and 19% (p=0.53) regained ambulatory status. One-year local control rates were 85% and 89% (p=0.87). One-year survival rates were 38% and 24% (p=0.20). The matched-pair analysis of patients receiving LE showed no significant differences between both therapies. In the matched-pair analysis of patients receiving DDSS, improvement of motor function occurred more often after DDSS+RT than RT (28% vs. 19%, p=0.024). Posttreatment ambulatory rates were 86% and 67% (p=0.30); 45% and 18% of patients regained ambulatory status (p=0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MSCC from an unfavorable primary tumor appeared to benefit from DDSS but not LE when added to radiotherapy in terms of improved functional outcome.

Comparison of four cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy regimens for nonmetastatic stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of four cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy regimens in 311 patients with Stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of three courses of cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on Day 1 (Group A, n = 74), two courses of cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) on Days 1-5 plus 5-fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m(2) on Days 1-5 (Group B, n = 49), two courses of cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) on Days 1-5 plus 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2) on Days 1-5 (Group C, n = 102), or two courses of cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) on Days 1-5 (Group D, n = 86). The groups were retrospectively compared for toxicity and outcomes, and 11 additional factors were evaluated for outcomes. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed among the groups regarding radiation-related acute oral mucositis and radiation-related late toxicities. Acute Grade 3 skin toxicity was significantly more frequent in Group B than in the patients of the other three groups (p = .013). The chemotherapy-related Grade 3 nausea/vomiting rate was 24% for Group A, 8% for Group B, 9% for Group C, and 6% for Group D (p = .003). The corresponding Grade 3 nephrotoxicity rates were 8%, 1%, 2%, and 1% (p = .019). The corresponding Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity rates were 35%, 41%, 19%, and 21% (p = .027). Chemotherapy could be completed in 50%, 59%, 74%, and 83% of the Group A, B, C, and D patients, respectively (p = .002). Toxicity-related radiotherapy breaks occurred in 39%, 43%, 21%, and 15% of Groups A, B, C, and D, respectively (p = .005). The 3-year locoregional control rate was 67%, 72%, 60%, and 59% for Groups A, B, C, and D, respectively (p = .48). The corresponding 3-year metastasis-free survival rates were 67%, 74%, 63%, and 79% (p = .31), and the corresponding 3-year survival rates were 60%, 63%, 50%, and 71% (p = .056). On multivariate analysis, Karnofsky performance status, histologic grade, T/N category, preradiotherapy hemoglobin level, completion of chemotherapy, and radiotherapy breaks were associated with the outcome. CONCLUSION: The four compared radiochemotherapy regimens were not significantly different regarding treatment outcomes. Two courses of cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) on Days 1-5 were better tolerated than the other three regimens.

Locally advanced stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: impact of pre-radiotherapy hemoglobin level and interruptions during radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Stage IV head and neck cancer patients carry a poor prognosis. Clear understanding of prognostic factors can help to optimize care for the individual patient. This study investigated 11 potential prognostic factors including pre-radiotherapy hemoglobin level and interruptions during radiotherapy for overall survival (OS), metastases-free survival (MFS), and locoregional control (LC) after radiochemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eleven factors were investigated in 153 patients receiving radiochemotherapy for Stage IV squamous cell head and neck cancer: age, gender, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), tumor site, grading, T stage, N stage, pre-radiotherapy hemoglobin level, surgery, chemotherapy type, and interruptions during radiotherapy>1 week. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, improved OS was associated with KPS 90-100 (relative risk [RR], 2.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-4.93; p=.012), hemoglobin>or=12 g/dL (RR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.01-3.53; p=.048), and no radiotherapy interruptions (RR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.15-5.78; p=.021). Improved LC was significantly associated with lower T stage (RR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.16-4.63; p=.013), hemoglobin>or=12 g/dL (RR, 4.12; 95% CI, 1.92-9.09; p<.001), surgery (RR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.28-5.88; p=.008), and no radiotherapy interruptions (RR, 3.32; 95% CI, 1.26-8.79; p=.015). Improved MFS was associated with KPS 90-100 (RR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.46-8.85; p=.012). CONCLUSIONS: Significant predictors for outcome in Stage IV head and neck cancer were performance status, stage, surgery, pre-radiotherapy hemoglobin level, and interruptions during radiotherapy>1 week. It appears important to avoid anemia and radiotherapy interruptions to achieve the best treatment results.

Toxicity of two cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy regimens for the treatment of patients with stage III/IV head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: This nonrandomized study compared 2 radiochemotherapy regimens for toxicity in 128 patients with stage III/IV head and neck cancer. METHODS: Patients received conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. The total dose to primary tumor and involved lymph nodes did depend on preceding surgery. Patients received 66 to 70 Gy if surgery was not performed, 60 to 66 Gy after R0 resection, 66 Gy after R1 resection, and 70 to 72 Gy after R2 resection. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of 3 courses cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)/d1,22,43) (group A, N = 61) or 2 courses cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/d1-5 + 29-33)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (600 mg/m(2)/d1-5 + 29-33) (group B, N = 67). RESULTS: Acute toxicity was more severe in group A, especially nausea/vomiting (p = .002), nephrotoxicity (p = .001), ototoxicity (p = .034), and hematotoxicity (p = .049). Forty-eight percent of group A and 10% of group B patients could not complete chemotherapy due to toxicity (p = .018). Late toxicity was similar (p = .99). CONCLUSION: Two courses of fractionated cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/d) and 5-FU were associated with significantly less acute toxicity than were 3 courses cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)/d).