Comprehensive molecular analyses and experimental validation of CDCAs with potential implications in kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma prognosis.

Previous reports have revealed that the abnormal expression of the cell division cycle-associated gene family (CDCAs) is closely associated with some human cancers. However, the precise functional roles and mechanisms of CDCAs in kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma (KIRP) remain unclear. In this study, RNA sequencing data from the Cancer Genome Atlas database and Genotype-Tissue Expression databases were utilized to perform the expression, correlation, survival, mutation, functional enrichment analysis, and immunoinfiltration analyses of CDCAs in KIRP. We found that the expression levels of CDCA genes were significantly increased in KIRP across multiple databases, as confirmed by immunohistochemistry and quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR). Moreover, increased expression of CDCA genes is significantly associated with poor prognosis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses demonstrated that pathologic T and N staging, NUF2, CDCA2, CDCA3, CDCA5, CBX2, CDCA7, and CDCA8 were independent prognostic factors for patients with KIRP. Utilizing these nine variables, we developed a nomogram prognostic model. Furthermore, the results of GO and KEGG functional enrichment analyses suggested that CDCA genes were associated with nuclear division, mitotic nuclear division, and chromosome segregation and were involved in the cell cycle, p53 signaling pathway, and cellular senescence. We found that the expression of NUF2, CDCA2, CDCA5, and CBX2 was closely associated with the expression of lymphocytes, immunostimulatory molecules, immunoinhibitory molecules, and chemokines. In summary, NUF2, CDCA2, CDCA3, CDCA5, CBX2, CDCA7, and CDCA8 are potential biomarkers for KIRP diagnosis and prognosis.

TGF-ß1 facilitates gallbladder carcinoma metastasis by regulating FOXA1 translation efficiency through m6A modification.

TGF-ß1 plays a pivotal role in the metastatic cascade of malignant neoplasms. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) stands as one of the most abundant modifications on the mRNA transcriptome. However, in the metastasis of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC), the effect of TGF-ß1 with mRNA m6A modification, especially the effect of mRNA translation efficiency associated with m6A modification, remains poorly elucidated. Here we demonstrated a negative correlation between FOXA1 and TGF-ß1 expression in GBC. Overexpression of FOXA1 inhibited TGF-ß1-induced migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in GBC cells. Mechanistically, we confirmed that TGF-ß1 suppressed the translation efficiency of FOXA1 mRNA through polysome profiling analysis. Importantly, both in vivo and in vitro experiments showed that TGF-ß1 promoted m6A modification on the coding sequence (CDS) region of FOXA1 mRNA, which was responsible for the inhibition of FOXA1 mRNA translation by TGF-ß1. We demonstrated through MeRIP and RIP assays, dual-luciferase reporter assays and site-directed mutagenesis that ALKBH5 promoted FOXA1 protein expression by inhibiting m6A modification on the CDS region of FOXA1 mRNA. Moreover, TGF-ß1 inhibited the binding capacity of ALKBH5 to the FOXA1 CDS region. Lastly, our study confirmed that overexpression of FOXA1 suppressed lung metastasis and EMT in a nude mice lung metastasis model. In summary, our research findings underscore the role of TGF-ß1 in regulating TGF-ß1/FOXA1-induced GBC EMT and metastasis by inhibiting FOXA1 translation efficiency through m6A modification.

Laparoscopic liver resection is superior to radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies.

BACKGROUND: The approach in small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial, no prospective randomized trials to compare ablative or surgical approaches. We compared the surgical and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in small HCC patients based on matched cohort studies that performed propensity score matching (PSM). METHODS: We systemically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and the Chinese BioMedical Literature (CBM) databases. All published propensity score-matched studies that compared LH and RFA for small HCC were included in this study. RESULTS: Eight studies with a total of 1273 small HCC cases were included. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in the 1- year overall survival (OS) rate between the two groups, whereas the LH group had significantly higher 3- year overall survival rate (RR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.20, p < 0.00001) as well as 1- and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates (RR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.22-1.42, p < 0.00001; RR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.46-1.90, p < 0.00001) than the RFA group. Meanwhile, the local recurrence rate and intrahepatic distant recurrence rate were significantly lower in the LH group than in the RFA group (RR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.20-0.42, p < 0.00001; RR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.49-0.92, p = 0.01). In comparison with the LH group, the RFA group had a lower incidence of overall and major postoperative complications (RR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.47-2.24, p < 0.00001; RR = 2.76, 95% CI 1.48-5.12, p = 0.001), but there was no significant difference in postoperative mortality between the two groups. In addition, further comparison of single postoperative complications showed that the incidence of ascites was lower in the RFA group than in the LH group (RR = 3.62, 95% CI 1.64-7.96, p = 0.001), whereas there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative bleeding, abdominal infection and bile leakage between the two groups (RR = 3.50, 95% CI 0.74-16.61, p = 0.11; RR = 5.00, 95% CI 0.59-42.23, p = 0.14; RR = 4.00, 95% CI 0.45-35.23, p = 0.21). Besides, the hospital stay was shorter in the RFA group than in the LH group (MD = 4.29, 95% CI 2.06-6.53, p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that in comparison with RFA in the treatment of small HCC, LH provided superior long-term OS and DFS together with lower rates of local and intrahepatic distant recurrence after surgery. However, RFA was associated with better short-term outcomes.